Prebunking Design as a Defense Mechanism Against Misinformation Propagation on Social Networks
Abstract: The growing reliance on social media for news consumption necessitates effective countermeasures to mitigate the rapid spread of misinformation. Prebunking, a proactive method that arms users with accurate information before they come across false content, has garnered support from journalism and psychology experts. We formalize the problem of optimal prebunking as optimizing the timing of delivering accurate information, ensuring users encounter it before receiving misinformation while minimizing the disruption to user experience. Utilizing a susceptible-infected epidemiological process to model the propagation of misinformation, we frame optimal prebunking as a policy synthesis problem with safety constraints. We then propose a policy that approximates the optimal solution to a relaxed problem. The experiments show that this policy cuts the user experience cost of repeated information delivery in half, compared to delivering accurate information immediately after identifying a misinformation propagation.
- “Social Media Fact sheet” In Pew Research Center Pew Research Center, 2021 URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/
- “Public health and online misinformation: challenges and recommendations” In Annu Rev Public Health 41.1, 2020, pp. 433–451
- Yochai Benkler, Robert Faris and Hal Roberts “Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics” Oxford University Press, 2018
- “Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change” In Global Challenges 1.2, 2017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600008
- S. Lewandowsky, U.K.H. Ecker and J. Cook “Beyond misinformation: understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era.” In Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 6, 2017, pp. 353–369 DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
- Gordon Pennycook and David G. Rand “The Psychology of Fake News” In Trends in Cognitive Sciences 25.5, 2021, pp. 388–402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
- “Optimal Control for Heterogeneous Node-Based Information Epidemics Over Social Networks” In IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems 7.3, 2020, pp. 1115–1126 DOI: 10.1109/TCNS.2019.2963488
- Yigit E. Bayiz and Ufuk Topcu “Countering Misinformation on Social Networks Using Graph Alterations”, 2022 arXiv:2211.04617 [cs.SI]
- Zhijiang Guo, Michael Schlichtkrull and Andreas Vlachos “A Survey on Automated Fact-Checking” In Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 10, 2022, pp. 178–206 DOI: 10.1162/tacl˙a˙00454
- “MultiFC: A Real-World Multi-Domain Dataset for Evidence-Based Fact Checking of Claims” Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019 DOI: 10.18653/v1/D19-1475
- “The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction” In Nature Reviews Psychology 1.1, 2022, pp. 13–29 DOI: 10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y
- “Distinguishing between facts and opinions for sentiment analysis: Survey and challenges” In Information Fusion 44, 2018, pp. 65–77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.12.006
- “Automatic Stance Detection Using End-to-End Memory Networks” Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018 DOI: 10.18653/v1/N18-1070
- “The spreading of misinformation online” In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113.3, 2016, pp. 554–559 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517441113
- “That is a Known Lie: Detecting Previously Fact-Checked Claims” Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020, pp. 3607–3618 DOI: 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.332
- “Infectious disease modeling of social contagion in networks” In PLOS computational biology 6.11 Public Library of Science San Francisco, USA, 2010
- “Fake News Propagation: A Review of Epidemic Models, Datasets, and Insights” In ACM Trans. Web 16.3 Association for Computing Machinery, 2022 DOI: 10.1145/3522756
- Subhashini Krishnasamy, Siddhartha Banerjee and Sanjay Shakkottai “The Behavior of Epidemics under Bounded Susceptibility” In SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. Association for Computing Machinery, 2014 DOI: 10.1145/2637364.2591977
- “SIR rumor spreading model in the new media age” In Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 392.4 Elsevier, 2013, pp. 995–1003
- “SIR rumor spreading model considering the effect of difference in nodes’ identification capabilities” In International Journal of Modern Physics 28.05 World Scientific, 2017
- Masahiro Kimura, Kazumi Saito and Hiroshi Motoda “Efficient estimation of influence functions for SIS model on social networks” In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2009
- “Epidemiological modeling of news and rumors on twitter” In Proceedings of Workshop on Social Network Mining and Analysis, 2013
- “Connected Components in Random Graphs with Given Expected Degree Sequences” In Annals of Combinatorics 6.2, 2002, pp. 125–145 DOI: 10.1007/PL00012580
- Dario Fasino, Arianna Tonetto and Francesco Tudisco “Generating large scale‐free networks with the Chung–Lu random graph model” In Networks 78.2 Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2021, pp. 174–187
- “WICO Text: A Labeled Dataset of Conspiracy Theory and 5G-Corona Misinformation Tweets” In Workshop on Open Challenges in Online Social Networks Association for Computing Machinery, 2021
- Jean-Loup Guillaume, Matthieu Latapy and Clémence Magnien “Comparison of failures and attacks on random and scale-free networks” In OPODIS 2004, 2005 Springer
- “Efficiency of scale-free networks: error and attack tolerance” In Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 320, 2003, pp. 622–642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01545-5
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.