Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Optimal colliding energy for the synthesis of superheavy element ZZ=119

Published 13 Nov 2023 in nucl-th and nucl-ex | (2311.07145v2)

Abstract: The evaporation residue (ER) cross section of 3n and 4n channels related to the synthesis of superheavy element (SHE) with the charge number Z=119Z=119 in the <sup>51<sup>{51}V+<sup>248<sup>{248}Cm reaction has been calculated by the dinuclear system (DNS) model as a sum of the partial cross sections of the corresponding channels. The angular momentum distribution of the compound nucleus is estimated by the dynamical trajectory calculations of the capture probability which is considered as the DNS formation probability. The fusion probability decreases by the increase of the DNS angular momentum due to its influence on the intrinsic fusion barrier Bfus<sup>∗B_{\rm fus}<sup>*. The range α2=60<sup>∘</sup>÷70<sup>∘\alpha_2=60<sup>{\circ}</sup> \div 70<sup>{\circ} of the orientation angle of the axial symmetry axis of the deformed target nucleus <sup>248<sup>{248}Cm is favorable for the formation of the compound nucleus. The fusion probability decreases at around α2=90<sup>∘\alpha_2=90<sup>{\circ} since the number of the partial waves contributing to the capture decreases. Therefore, it is important to calculate the capture cross section dynamically. The 4n channel cross section of the SHE synthesis is larger than the 3n channel cross section maximum value of the ER cross section is 12.3 fb at Ec.m.E_{\rm c.m.}=232 MeV.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. S. Hofmann and G. Münzenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 733 (2000).
  2. Z.-H. Liu and J.-D. Bao, Phys. Rev. C 87, 034616 (2013).
  3. N. Ghahramany and A. Ansari, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 287 (2016).
  4. J.-X. Li and H.-F. Zhang, Phys. Rev. C 105, 054606 (2022).
  5. A. J. Sierk, Phys. Rev. C 33, 2039 (1986).
  6. E. C. Kemble, Phys. Rev. 48, 549 (1935).
  7. R. H. Spear, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 42, 55 (1989).
  8. H. Esbensen, Nuclear Physics A 352, 147 (1981).
  9. V. Weisskopf, Phys. Rev. 52, 295 (1937).
  10. N. Bohr and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 56, 426 (1939).
  11. M. K. Grossjean and H. Feldmeier, Nucl. Phys. A 444, 113 (1985).
  12. D. L. Hill and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 89, 1102 (1953).
  13. R. W. Hasse and W. D. Myers, Geometrical Relationships of Macroscopic Nuclear Physics (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1988).
  14. F. A. Ivanyuk and K. Pomorski, Phys. Rev. C 79, 054327 (2009).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.