Milestoning estimators of dissipation in systems observed at a coarse resolution: When ignorance is truly bliss
Abstract: Many non-equilibrium, active processes are observed at a coarse-grained level, where different microscopic configurations are projected onto the same observable state. Such "lumped" observables display memory, and in many cases the irreversible character of the underlying microscopic dynamics becomes blurred, e.g., when the projection hides dissipative cycles. As a result, the observations appear less irreversible, and it is very challenging to infer the degree of broken time-reversal symmetry. Here we show, contrary to intuition, that by ignoring parts of the already coarse-grained state space we may -- via a process called milestoning -- improve entropy-production estimates. Milestoning systematically renders observations "closer to underlying microscopic dynamics" and thereby improves thermodynamic inference from lumped data assuming a given range of memory. Moreover, whereas the correct general physical definition of time-reversal in the presence of memory remains unknown, we here show by means of systematic, physically relevant examples that at least for semi-Markov processes of first and second order, waiting-time contributions arising from adopting a naive Markovian definition of time-reversal generally must be discarded.
- A. Godec and D. E. Makarov, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 49 (2023).
- Y. Tu, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 11737 (2008).
- D. E. Makarov, Single molecule science: physical principles and models (CRC Press, 2015).
- C. Dieball and A. Godec, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 140601 (2022a).
- N. Q. Hoffer and M. T. Woodside, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 53, 68 (2019).
- B. Schuler and W. A. Eaton, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18, 16 (2008).
- H. S. Chung and W. A. Eaton, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 48, 30 (2018).
- L. Peliti and S. Pigolotti, Stochastic Thermodynamics: An Introduction (Princeton University Press, 2021).
- U. Seifert, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 126001 (2012).
- H. Wang and H. Qian, J. Math. Phys. 48, 013303 (2007).
- D. Hartich and A. Godec, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041047 (2021a).
- D. Hartich and A. Godec, “Comment on ”inferring broken detailed balance in the absence of observable currents”,” (2022), arXiv:2112.08978 [cond-mat.stat-mech] .
- M. Esposito, Phys. Rev. E 85, 041125 (2012).
- J. Degünther, J. van der Meer, and U. Seifert, “Fluctuating entropy production on the coarse-grained level: Inference and localization of irreversibility,” (2023), arXiv:2309.07665 [cond-mat.stat-mech] .
- In case of a perfect time-scale separation between the observed and hidden degrees of freedom, the total entropy production is not necessarily underestimated by a coarse-grained representation.
- G. Teza and A. L. Stella, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 110601 (2020a).
- P. Talkner and P. Hänggi, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 041002 (2020).
- A. C. Barato and U. Seifert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 158101 (2015).
- J. M. Horowitz and T. R. Gingrich, Nat. Phys. 16, 15 (2019).
- T. Koyuk and U. Seifert, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 54, 414005 (2021).
- C. Dieball and A. Godec, Phys. Rev. Research 4, 033243 (2022b).
- A. Dechant and S.-i. Sasa, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 042012 (2021a).
- A. Dechant and S.-i. Sasa, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041061 (2021b).
- C. Dieball and A. Godec, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 087101 (2023).
- U. Seifert, Physica A 504, 176 (2018).
- J. Ehrich, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2021, 083214 (2021).
- D. J. Skinner and J. Dunkel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 198101 (2021).
- D. Hartich and A. Godec, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L032017 (2023).
- J. M. Bello-Rivas and R. Elber, J. Chem. Phys. 142, 094102 (2015).
- R. Elber, J. Chem. Phys. 144, 060901 (2016).
- G. Teza and A. L. Stella, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 110601 (2020b).
- E. Nitzan, A. Ghosal, and G. Bisker, “Universal bounds on entropy production inferred from observed statistics,” (2022), arXiv:2212.01783 [cond-mat.stat-mech] .
- M. Delorenzi and T. Speed, Bioinformatics 18, 617 (2002).
- E. Roldán and J. M. R. Parrondo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 150607 (2010).
- E. Roldán and J. M. R. Parrondo, Phys. Rev. E 85, 031129 (2012).
- T. E. Harris, J. Appl. Prob. 2, 323 (1965).
- J. L. Lebowitz and J. K. Percus, Phys. Rev. 155, 122 (1967).
- E. Barkai and R. Silbey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 050602 (2009).
- N. Leibovich and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. E 88, 032107 (2013).
- A. Lapolla and A. Godec, New J. Phys. 20, 113021 (2018).
- A. Lapolla and A. Godec, J. Chem. Phys. 153, 194104 (2020).
- D. Hartich and A. Godec, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 080601 (2021b).
- I. M. Sokolov, Soft Matter 8, 9043 (2012).
- A. Miron and D. Mukamel, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 54, 025001 (2020).
- A. Kundu and J. Cividini, EPL 115, 54003 (2016).
- K. Proesmans and C. V. den Broeck, EPL 119, 20001 (2017).
- J. Vrbik, Math. J. 14, 1 (2012).
- W. Feller, An introduction to probability theory and its applications, Volume 2, Vol. 81 (John Wiley & Sons, 1991).
- A. M. Berezhkovskii and D. E. Makarov, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 2190–2195 (2018).
- A. Lapolla and A. Godec, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L022018 (2021).
- A dissipative cycle in a Markov process is a cycle for which the Kolmogorov cycle criterion is violated. The cycle is said to be hidden if the states of said cycle are coarse-grained into the same lump.
- D. Hartich and A. Godec, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041047 (2021).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.