Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Improving Vision Anomaly Detection with the Guidance of Language Modality

Published 4 Oct 2023 in cs.CV and cs.AI | (2310.02821v1)

Abstract: Recent years have seen a surge of interest in anomaly detection for tackling industrial defect detection, event detection, etc. However, existing unsupervised anomaly detectors, particularly those for the vision modality, face significant challenges due to redundant information and sparse latent space. Conversely, the language modality performs well due to its relatively single data. This paper tackles the aforementioned challenges for vision modality from a multimodal point of view. Specifically, we propose Cross-modal Guidance (CMG), which consists of Cross-modal Entropy Reduction (CMER) and Cross-modal Linear Embedding (CMLE), to tackle the redundant information issue and sparse space issue, respectively. CMER masks parts of the raw image and computes the matching score with the text. Then, CMER discards irrelevant pixels to make the detector focus on critical contents. To learn a more compact latent space for the vision anomaly detector, CMLE learns a correlation structure matrix from the language modality, and then the latent space of vision modality will be learned with the guidance of the matrix. Thereafter, the vision latent space will get semantically similar images closer. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods. Particularly, CMG outperforms the baseline that only uses images by 16.81%. Ablation experiments further confirm the synergy among the proposed methods, as each component depends on the other to achieve optimal performance.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (43)
  1. A. Rosenberg and J. Hirschberg, “V-measure: A conditional entropy-based external cluster evaluation measure,” in Proceedings of the 2007 joint conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and computational natural language learning (EMNLP-CoNLL), 2007, pp. 410–420.
  2. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, pp. 770–778.
  3. J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018.
  4. W. D. Fisher, T. K. Camp, and V. V. Krzhizhanovskaya, “Anomaly detection in earth dam and levee passive seismic data using support vector machines and automatic feature selection,” Journal of Computational Science, vol. 20, pp. 143–153, 2017.
  5. Y. Wu, Y. Lin, Z. Zhou, D. C. Bolton, J. Liu, and P. Johnson, “Deepdetect: A cascaded region-based densely connected network for seismic event detection,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 62–75, 2018.
  6. T. Schlegl, P. Seeböck, S. M. Waldstein, G. Langs, and U. Schmidt-Erfurth, “f-anogan: Fast unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks,” Medical image analysis, vol. 54, pp. 30–44, 2019.
  7. S. Latif, M. Usman, R. Rana, and J. Qadir, “Phonocardiographic sensing using deep learning for abnormal heartbeat detection,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 18, no. 22, pp. 9393–9400, 2018.
  8. P. Seeböck, J. I. Orlando, T. Schlegl, S. M. Waldstein, H. Bogunović, S. Klimscha, G. Langs, and U. Schmidt-Erfurth, “Exploiting epistemic uncertainty of anatomy segmentation for anomaly detection in retinal oct,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 87–98, 2019.
  9. P. Bergmann, M. Fauser, D. Sattlegger, and C. Steger, “Mvtec ad–a comprehensive real-world dataset for unsupervised anomaly detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019, pp. 9592–9600.
  10. L. Cui, X. Jiang, M. Xu, W. Li, P. Lv, and B. Zhou, “Sddnet: A fast and accurate network for surface defect detection,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 70, pp. 1–13, 2021.
  11. Y. Zhang, X. Nie, R. He, M. Chen, and Y. Yin, “Normality learning in multispace for video anomaly detection,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 3694–3706, 2020.
  12. S. Zhang, M. Gong, Y. Xie, A. K. Qin, H. Li, Y. Gao, and Y.-S. Ong, “Influence-aware attention networks for anomaly detection in surveillance videos,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 5427–5437, 2022.
  13. J. T. Zhou, L. Zhang, Z. Fang, J. Du, X. Peng, and Y. Xiao, “Attention-driven loss for anomaly detection in video surveillance,” IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 4639–4647, 2019.
  14. Q. Zhou, S. He, H. Liu, T. Chen, and J. Chen, “Pull & push: Leveraging differential knowledge distillation for efficient unsupervised anomaly detection and localization,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2022.
  15. J. Gao, B. Zhong, and Y. Chen, “Robust tracking via learning model update with unsupervised anomaly detection philosophy,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2022.
  16. S. Hawkins, H. He, G. Williams, and R. Baxter, “Outlier detection using replicator neural networks,” in Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery: 4th International Conference, DaWaK 2002 Aix-en-Provence, France, September 4–6, 2002 Proceedings 4.   Springer, 2002, pp. 170–180.
  17. M. Schreyer, T. Sattarov, D. Borth, A. Dengel, and B. Reimer, “Detection of anomalies in large scale accounting data using deep autoencoder networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.05254, 2017.
  18. L. Ruff, R. Vandermeulen, N. Goernitz, L. Deecke, S. A. Siddiqui, A. Binder, E. Müller, and M. Kloft, “Deep one-class classification,” in International conference on machine learning.   PMLR, 2018, pp. 4393–4402.
  19. Y. Geifman and R. El-Yaniv, “Selective classification for deep neural networks,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017.
  20. R. El-Yaniv et al., “On the foundations of noise-free selective classification.” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 11, no. 5, 2010.
  21. E. Nalisnick, A. Matsukawa, Y. W. Teh, D. Gorur, and B. Lakshminarayanan, “Do deep generative models know what they don’t know?” arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.09136, 2018.
  22. D. P. Kingma and P. Dhariwal, “Glow: Generative flow with invertible 1x1 convolutions,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 31, 2018.
  23. V. Sehwag, M. Chiang, and P. Mittal, “Ssd: A unified framework for self-supervised outlier detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.12051, 2021.
  24. Y. Zhu, J. T. Kwok, and Z.-H. Zhou, “Multi-label learning with global and local label correlation,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1081–1094, 2017.
  25. D. Chen, Y. Zhuang, Z. Shen, C. Yang, G. Wang, S. Tang, and Y. Yang, “Cross-modal data augmentation for tasks of different modalities,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2022.
  26. K.-L. Li, H.-K. Huang, S.-F. Tian, and W. Xu, “Improving one-class svm for anomaly detection,” in Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on machine learning and cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No. 03EX693), vol. 5.   IEEE, 2003, pp. 3077–3081.
  27. C. Zhou and R. C. Paffenroth, “Anomaly detection with robust deep autoencoders,” in Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2017, pp. 665–674.
  28. L. Li, R. J. Hansman, R. Palacios, and R. Welsch, “Anomaly detection via a gaussian mixture model for flight operation and safety monitoring,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 64, pp. 45–57, 2016.
  29. P. Liznerski, L. Ruff, R. A. Vandermeulen, B. J. Franks, K.-R. Müller, and M. Kloft, “Exposing outlier exposure: What can be learned from few, one, and zero outlier images,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11474, 2022.
  30. I. Golan and R. El-Yaniv, “Deep anomaly detection using geometric transformations,” in NeurIPS, 2018.
  31. D. Hendrycks, M. Mazeika, S. Kadavath, and D. Song, “Using self-supervised learning can improve model robustness and uncertainty,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 32, 2019.
  32. T. Chen, S. Kornblith, M. Norouzi, and G. Hinton, “A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations,” in International conference on machine learning.   PMLR, 2020, pp. 1597–1607.
  33. J. Tack, S. Mo, J. Jeong, and J. Shin, “Csi: Novelty detection via contrastive learning on distributionally shifted instances,” in 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) 2020.   Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020.
  34. J. Zhang, Q. Fu, X. Chen, L. Du, Z. Li, G. Wang, xiaoguang Liu, S. Han, and D. Zhang, “Out-of-distribution detection based on in-distribution data patterns memorization with modern hopfield energy,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=KkazG4lgKL
  35. C.-Y. Chuang, J. Robinson, Y.-C. Lin, A. Torralba, and S. Jegelka, “Debiased contrastive learning,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 8765–8775, 2020.
  36. S. T. Roweis and L. K. Saul, “Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding,” science, vol. 290, no. 5500, pp. 2323–2326, 2000.
  37. T.-Y. Lin, M. Maire, S. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, P. Dollár, and C. L. Zitnick, “Microsoft coco: Common objects in context,” in Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13.   Springer, 2014, pp. 740–755.
  38. B. Qu, X. Li, D. Tao, and X. Lu, “Deep semantic understanding of high resolution remote sensing image,” in 2016 International conference on computer, information and telecommunication systems (Cits).   IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–5.
  39. N. Rasiwasia, J. Costa Pereira, E. Coviello, G. Doyle, G. R. Lanckriet, R. Levy, and N. Vasconcelos, “A new approach to cross-modal multimedia retrieval,” in Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on Multimedia, 2010, pp. 251–260.
  40. H. Xiao, “bert-as-service,” https://github.com/hanxiao/bert-as-service, 2018.
  41. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
  42. D. Chen, L. Wu, S. Tang, X. Yun, B. Long, and Y. Zhuang, “Robust meta-learning with sampling noise and label noise via eigen-reptile,” in International Conference on Machine Learning.   PMLR, 2022, pp. 3662–3678.
  43. L. Van der Maaten and G. Hinton, “Visualizing data using t-sne.” Journal of machine learning research, vol. 9, no. 11, 2008.
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.