Collective group drift in a PDE-based opinion dynamics model with biased perception kernels
Abstract: In the age of technology, individuals accelerate their biased gathering of information which in turn leads to a population becoming extreme and more polarized. Here we study a partial differential equation model for opinion dynamics that exhibits collective behavior subject to nonlocal interactions. We developed a new interaction kernel function to represent biased information gathering. Through a linear stability analysis, we show that biased populations can still form opinionated groups. However, a population that is too heavily biased can no longer come to a consensus, that is, the initial homogeneous mixed state becomes stable. Numerical simulations with biased information gathering show the ability for groups to collectively drift towards one end of the opinion space. This means that a small bias in each individual will collectively lead to groups of individuals becoming extreme together. The characteristic time scale for a groups existence is captured from numerical experiments using the temporal correlation function. Supplementing this, we included a measure of how different each population is after regular time intervals using a form of the Manhattan and Euclidean distance metrics. We conclude by exploring how wall boundary conditions induce pattern formation initially on the most extreme sides of the domain.
- C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, and V. Loreto, Statistical physics of social dynamics, Reviews of modern physics 81, 591 (2009).
- E. L. Glaeser and C. R. Sunstein, Extremism and social learning, Journal of Legal Analysis 1, 263 (2009).
- J. Lorenz, Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey, International Journal of Modern Physics C 18, 1819 (2007).
- U. Kan, M. Feng, and M. A. Porter, An adaptive bounded-confidence model of opinion dynamics on networks, Journal of Complex Networks 11, 415 (2023).
- G. J. Li, J. Luo, and M. A. Porter, Bounded-confidence models of opinion dynamics with adaptive confidence bounds, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07563 (2023).
- E. Ben-Naim, P. L. Krapivsky, and S. Redner, Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes, Physica D: nonlinear phenomena 183, 190 (2003).
- D. Sabin-Miller and D. M. Abrams, When pull turns to shove: A continuous-time model for opinion dynamics, Physical Review Research 2, 043001 (2020).
- H. Sayama, Enhanced ability of information gathering may intensify disagreement among groups, Physical Review E 102, 012303 (2020).
- E. Ben-Naim, Opinion dynamics: rise and fall of political parties, Europhysics Letters 69, 671 (2005).
- D. Baldassarri and S. E. Page, The emergence and perils of polarization, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (2021).
- G. Levy and R. Razin, Echo chambers and their effects on economic and political outcomes, Annual Review of Economics 11, 303 (2019).
- M. M. Waldrop, Modeling the power of polarization, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2114484118 (2021).
- Simulation code at : https://github.com/ckoertje/PDE-Opinion-Dynamics-w-Bias/.
- M. C. Cross and P. C. Hohenberg, Pattern formation outside of equilibrium, Reviews of modern physics 65, 851 (1993).
- M. Alexanian and D. McNamara, Anti-diffusion in continuous opinion dynamics, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 503, 1256 (2018).
- C. Koertje, Modeling Continuous Opinion Dynamics with Biased Interactions, Master’s thesis, State University of New York at Binghamton (2023).
- G. Toscani, Kinetic models of opinion formation, Communications in mathematical sciences 4, 481 (2006).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.