Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

APIS: A paired CT-MRI dataset for ischemic stroke segmentation challenge

Published 26 Sep 2023 in eess.IV, cs.CV, and q-bio.NC | (2309.15243v1)

Abstract: Stroke is the second leading cause of mortality worldwide. Immediate attention and diagnosis play a crucial role regarding patient prognosis. The key to diagnosis consists in localizing and delineating brain lesions. Standard stroke examination protocols include the initial evaluation from a non-contrast CT scan to discriminate between hemorrhage and ischemia. However, non-contrast CTs may lack sensitivity in detecting subtle ischemic changes in the acute phase. As a result, complementary diffusion-weighted MRI studies are captured to provide valuable insights, allowing to recover and quantify stroke lesions. This work introduced APIS, the first paired public dataset with NCCT and ADC studies of acute ischemic stroke patients. APIS was presented as a challenge at the 20th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2023, where researchers were invited to propose new computational strategies that leverage paired data and deal with lesion segmentation over CT sequences. Despite all the teams employing specialized deep learning tools, the results suggest that the ischemic stroke segmentation task from NCCT remains challenging. The annotated dataset remains accessible to the public upon registration, inviting the scientific community to deal with stroke characterization from NCCT but guided with paired DWI information.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. Valery L Feigin et al., “World stroke organization (wso): global stroke fact sheet 2022,” International Journal of Stroke, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 18–29, 2022.
  2. Gregory A Roth et al., “Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: update from the gbd 2019 study,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 76, no. 25, pp. 2982–3021, 2020.
  3. Robert C Rennert et al., “Epidemiology, Natural History, and Clinical Presentation of Large Vessel Ischemic Stroke,” Neurosurg., vol. 85, no. suppl_1, pp. S4–S8, July 2019.
  4. William J Powers et al., “Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association,” Stroke, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. e344–e418, 2019.
  5. Matthew B Bevers et al., “Apparent diffusion coefficient signal intensity ratio predicts the effect of revascularization on ischemic cerebral edema,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 45, no. 3-4, pp. 93–100, 2018.
  6. Anne L. Martel et al., “Measurement of infarct volume in stroke patients using adaptive segmentation of diffusion weighted MR images,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 1999.
  7. Arnab K Rana et al., “Apparent diffusion coefficient (adc) measurements may be more reliable and reproducible than lesion volume on diffusion-weighted images from patients with acute ischaemic stroke–implications for study design,” Magnetic resonance imaging, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 617–624, 2003.
  8. Oskar Maier et al., “Isles 2015-a public evaluation benchmark for ischemic stroke lesion segmentation from multispectral mri,” Medical image analysis, vol. 35, pp. 250–269, 2017.
  9. Stefan Winzeck et al., “Isles 2016 and 2017-benchmarking ischemic stroke lesion outcome prediction based on multispectral mri,” Frontiers in neurology, vol. 9, pp. 679, 2018.
  10. Arsany Hakim et al., “Predicting infarct core from computed tomography perfusion in acute ischemia with machine learning: Lessons from the isles challenge,” Stroke, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 2328–2337, 2021.
  11. Moritz R Hernandez Petzsche et al., “Isles 2022: A multi-center magnetic resonance imaging stroke lesion segmentation dataset,” Scientific data, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 762, 2022.
  12. Sook-Lei Liew et al., “A large, open source dataset of stroke anatomical brain images and manual lesion segmentations,” Scientific data, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2018.
  13. Sook-Lei Liew et al., “A large, curated, open-source stroke neuroimaging dataset to improve lesion segmentation algorithms,” Scientific data, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 320, 2022.
  14. Kongming Liang et al., “Symmetry-enhanced attention network for acute ischemic infarct segmentation with non-contrast ct images,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, September 27–October 1, 2021, Proceedings, Part VII 24. Springer, 2021, pp. 432–441.
  15. Alzbeta Tureckova et al., “ISLES challenge: U-shaped convolution neural network with dilated convolution for 3D stroke lesion segmentation,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11383 LNCS, pp. 319–327, 2019.
  16. Hulin Kuang et al., “EIS-Net: Segmenting early infarct and scoring ASPECTS simultaneously on non-contrast CT of patients with acute ischemic stroke,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 70, no. February, pp. 101984, 2021.
  17. Guotai Wang et al., “Automatic ischemic stroke lesion segmentation from computed tomography perfusion images by image synthesis and attention-based deep neural networks,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 65, pp. 101787, 2020.
  18. Alejandro Gutierrez et al., “Lesion-preserving unpaired image-to-image translation between MRI and CT from ischemic stroke patients,” Int J CARS, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 827–836, Jan. 2023.
  19. Hulin Kuang et al., “Automated infarct segmentation from follow-up non-contrast ct scans in patients with acute ischemic stroke using dense multi-path contextual generative adversarial network,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2019: 22nd International Conference, Shenzhen, China, October 13–17, 2019, Proceedings, Part III 22. Springer, 2019, pp. 856–863.
  20. Yanran Wang et al., “A deep symmetry convnet for stroke lesion segmentation,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 2016, pp. 111–115.
  21. Sven Dekeyzer et al., “Distinction between contrast staining and hemorrhage after endovascular stroke treatment: one ct is not enough,” Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 394–398, 2017.
  22. Haomiao Ni et al., “Asymmetry Disentanglement Network for Interpretable Acute Ischemic Stroke Infarct Segmentation in Non-contrast CT Scans,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2022, vol. 13438, pp. 416–426. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2022.
  23. “Combining convolutional attention mechanism and residual deformable Transformer for infarct segmentation from CT scans of acute ischemic stroke patients,” Front. Neurol., vol. 14, pp. 1178637, July 2023.
  24. Jose Dolz et al., “Dense multi-path u-net for ischemic stroke lesion segmentation in multiple image modalities,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 11383 LNCS, pp. 271–282, 2019.
  25. Albert Clèrigues et al., “Acute ischemic stroke lesion core segmentation in CT perfusion images using fully convolutional neural networks,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 115, pp. 103487, 2019.
  26. Pengbo Liu, “Stroke lesion segmentation with 2D novel CNN pipeline and novel loss function,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 11383 LNCS, pp. 253–262, 2019.
  27. Andrew Mark Allmendinger et al., “Imaging of stroke: Part 1, perfusion ct - overview of imaging technique, interpretation pearls, and common pitfalls,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 198, no. 1, pp. 52–62, 2012.
  28. Romane Gauriau et al., “Head ct deep learning model is highly accurate for early infarct estimation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 189, 2023.
  29. Xiangrui Li et al., “The first step for neuroimaging data analysis: Dicom to nifti conversion,” Journal of neuroscience methods, vol. 264, pp. 47–56, 2016.
  30. Thorsten Falk et al., “U-net: deep learning for cell counting, detection, and morphometry,” Nature methods, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 67–70, 2019.
Citations (4)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.