Relating Wigner's Friend Scenarios to Nonclassical Causal Compatibility, Monogamy Relations, and Fine Tuning
Abstract: Nonclassical causal modeling was developed in order to explain violations of Bell inequalities while adhering to relativistic causal structure and faithfulness -- that is, avoiding fine-tuned causal explanations. Recently, a no-go theorem that can be viewed as being stronger than Bell's theorem has been derived, based on extensions of the Wigner's friend thought experiment: the Local Friendliness (LF) no-go theorem. Here we show that the LF no-go theorem poses formidable challenges for the field of causal modeling, even when nonclassical and/or cyclic causal explanations are considered. We first recast the LF inequalities, one of the key elements of the LF no-go theorem, as special cases of monogamy relations stemming from a statistical marginal problem. We then further recast LF inequalities as causal compatibility inequalities stemming from a nonclassical causal marginal problem, for a causal structure implied by well-motivated causal-metaphysical assumptions. We find that the LF inequalities emerge from this causal structure even when one allows the latent causes of observed events to admit post-quantum descriptions, such as in a generalized probabilistic theory or in an even more exotic theory. We further prove that no nonclassical causal model can explain violations of LF inequalities without violating the No Fine-Tuning principle. Finally, we note that these obstacles cannot be overcome even if one appeals to cyclic causal models, and we discuss potential directions for further extensions of the causal modeling framework.
- C. Glymour, Markov Properties and Quantum Experiments, in Physical Theory and Its Interpretation: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Bub, The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, edited by W. Demopoulos and I. Pitowsky (Springer Netherlands, 2006) pp. 117–126.
- C. J. Wood and R. W. Spekkens, The Lesson of Causal Discovery Algorithms for Quantum Correlations: Causal Explanations of Bell-inequality Violations Require Fine-Tuning, New Journal of Physics 17, 033002 (2015), arXiv:1208.4119 .
- J. S. Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox, Physics Physique Fizika 1, 195 (1964).
- J. S. Bell, The Theory of Local Beables, Epistemological Letters 9, 11 (1976).
- E. G. Cavalcanti, Classical Causal Models for Bell and Kochen-Specker Inequality Violations Require Fine-Tuning, Physical Review X 8, 021018 (2018), arXiv:1705.05961 .
- J. C. Pearl and E. G. Cavalcanti, Classical causalmodels cannot faithfully explain Bell nonlocality or Kochen-Specker contextuality in arbitrary scenarios, Quantum 5, 518 (2021).
- T. Fritz, Beyond Bell’s theorem: correlation scenarios, New Journal of Physics 14, 103001 (2012), arXiv:1206.5115 .
- T. C. Fraser and E. Wolfe, Causal compatibility inequalities admitting quantum violations in the triangle structure, Physical Review A 98, 022113 (2018), arXiv:1709.06242 .
- X. Coiteux-Roy, E. Wolfe, and M.-O. Renou, No Bipartite-Nonlocal Causal Theory Can Explain Nature’s Correlations, Physical Review Letters 127, 200401 (2021a), arXiv:2105.09381 .
- E. Wolfe, R. W. Spekkens, and T. Fritz, The Inflation Technique for Causal Inference with Latent Variables, Journal of Causal Inference 7, 20170020 (2019), arXiv:1609.00672 .
- M. Navascués and E. Wolfe, The Inflation Technique Completely Solves the Causal Compatibility Problem, Journal of Causal Inference 8, 70 (2020), arXiv:1707.06476 .
- D. Rosset, N. Gisin, and E. Wolfe, Universal bound on the cardinality of local hidden variables in networks, Quantum Information and Computation 18, 0910 (2018), arXiv:1709.00707 .
- T. Fraser, A Combinatorial Solution to Causal Compatibility, Journal of Causal Inference 8, 22 (2020), arXiv:1902.07091 .
- B. Zjawin, E. Wolfe, and R. W. Spekkens, Restricted Hidden Cardinality Constraints in Causal Models (2021), arXiv:2109.05656 .
- T. Richardson and F. Eberhart, eds., Quantum Physics and Statistical Causal Models Workshop (Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing, 2022).
- Causal Inference & Quantum Foundations Workshop (Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, 2023).
- J. Henson, R. Lal, and M. F. Pusey, Theory-Independent Limits on Correlations from Generalized Bayesian Networks, New Journal of Physics 16, 113043 (2014), arXiv:1405.2572 .
- J. Barrett, R. Lorenz, and O. Oreshkov, Quantum Causal Models (2020), arXiv:1906.10726 [quant-ph] .
- F. Costa and S. Shrapnel, Quantum Causal Modelling, New Journal of Physics 18, 063032 (2016), arXiv:1512.07106 .
- M. Weilenmann and R. Colbeck, Analysing causal structures in generalised probabilistic theories, Quantum 4, 236 (2020).
- X. Coiteux-Roy, E. Wolfe, and M.-O. Renou, Any physical theory of nature must be boundlessly multipartite nonlocal, Phys. Rev. A 104, 052207 (2021b).
- R. Chaves, C. Majenz, and D. Gross, Information-theoretic implications of quantum causal structures, Nature Communications 6, 5766 (2015).
- P. Forré and J. M. Mooij, Markov Properties for Graphical Models with Cycles and Latent Variables (2017), arXiv:1710.08775 [math.ST] .
- M. Araújo, P. A. Guérin, and A. Baumeler, Quantum computation with indefinite causal structures, Phys. Rev. A 96, 052315 (2017).
- J. Barrett, R. Lorenz, and O. Oreshkov, Cyclic quantum causal models, Nature Communications 12, 885 (2021), arXiv:2002.12157 .
- O. Oreshkov, F. Costa, and Č. Brukner, Quantum correlations with no causal order, Nature Communications 3, 1092 (2012), arXiv:1105.4464 .
- D. Schmid, Y. Yīng, and M. Leifer, A review and analysis of six extended Wigner’s friend arguments (2023), arXiv:2308.16220 [quant-ph] .
- H. M. Wiseman, E. G. Cavalcanti, and E. G. Rieffel, A “thoughtful” local friendliness no-go theorem: a prospective experiment with new assumptions to suit, Quantum 7, 1112 (2023).
- H. M. Wiseman and E. G. Cavalcanti, Causarum Investigatio and the Two Bell’s Theorems of John Bell, in Quantum [Un]Speakables II: Half a Century of Bell’s Theorem, The Frontiers Collection, edited by R. Bertlmann and A. Zeilinger (Springer International Publishing, 2017) pp. 119–142, arXiv:1503.06413 .
- E. G. Cavalcanti and H. M. Wiseman, Implications of Local Friendliness Violation for Quantum Causality, Entropy 23, 925 (2021), arXiv:2106.04065 .
- S. Triantafillou, I. Tsamardinos, and I. Tollis, Learning Causal Structure from Overlapping Variable Sets, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 2010) pp. 860–867.
- N. N. Vorob’ev, Consistent Families of Measures and Their Extensions, Theory of Probability & Its Applications 7, 147 (1962).
- E. Adlam, What Does ’(Non)-Absoluteness of Observed Events’ Mean? (2023), arXiv:2309.03171 [quant-ph] .
- D. Geiger, Towards the formalization of informational dependencies (UCLA Computer Science, 1988).
- Private correspondence with Marc-Olivier Renou and Victor Gitton.
- J. Barrett, Information processing in generalized probabilistic theories (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0508211 .
- A. Baumeler and S. Wolf, Perfect signaling among three parties violating predefined causal order, in 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (IEEE, 2014).
- C. A. Ferradini, V. Vilasini, and V. Gitton, A causal modelling framework for classical and quantum cyclic causal structures (2023), upcoming.
- V. Vilasini and R. Colbeck, General framework for cyclic and fine-tuned causal models and their compatibility with space-time, Physical Review A 106, 032204 (2022), arXiv:2109.12128 .
- D. Deutsch, Quantum Theory as a Universal Physical Theory, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 24, 1 (1985).
- V. Baumann and C. Brukner, Observers in superposition and the no-signaling principle (2023), arXiv:2305.15497 [quant-ph] .
- C. Rovelli, The Relational Interpretation, in The Oxford Handbook of the History of Quantum Interpretations, edited by O. Freire (Oxford University Press, 2022) Chap. 43, arXiv:2109.09170 .
- A. Di Biagio and C. Rovelli, Stable Facts, Relative Facts, Foundations of Physics 51, 1 (2021), arXiv:2006.15543 .
- C. A. Fuchs and B. C. Stacey, QBism: Quantum Theory as a Hero’s Handbook (2016), arXiv:1612.07308 [quant-ph] .
- D. Wallace, The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory According to the Everett Interpretation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014).
- G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, and P. Perinotti, Probabilistic theories with purification, Phys. Rev. A 81, 062348 (2010).
- M. Müller, Probabilistic theories and reconstructions of quantum theory, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes 10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.28 (2021).
- M. Plávala, General probabilistic theories: An introduction, Physics Reports 1033, 1 (2023), general probabilistic theories: An introduction.
- D. Geiger, T. Verma, and J. Pearl, Identifying independence in bayesian networks, Networks 20, 507 (1990).
- J. T. A. Koster, On the Validity of the Markov Interpretation of Path Diagrams of Gaussian Structural Equations Systems with Correlated Errors, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 26, 413 (1999).
- K. Sadeghi, Faithfulness of Probability Distributions and Graphs (2017), arXiv:1701.08366 [math.ST] .
- P. Bierhorst, A robust mathematical model for a loophole-free Clauser-Horne experiment, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 48, 195302 (2015), arXiv:1312.2999 .
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.