Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Hybrid SBI or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Learn the Likelihood (2309.10270v1)

Published 19 Sep 2023 in astro-ph.CO

Abstract: We propose a new framework for the analysis of current and future cosmological surveys, which combines perturbative methods (PT) on large scales with conditional simulation-based implicit inference (SBI) on small scales. This enables modeling of a wide range of statistics across all scales using only small-volume simulations, drastically reducing computational costs, and avoids the assumption of an explicit small-scale likelihood. As a proof-of-principle for this hybrid simulation-based inference (HySBI) approach, we apply it to dark matter density fields and constrain cosmological parameters using both the power spectrum and wavelet coefficients, finding promising results that significantly outperform classical PT methods. We additionally lay out a roadmap for the next steps necessary to implement HySBI on actual survey data, including consideration of bias, systematics, and customized simulations. Our approach provides a realistic way to scale SBI to future survey volumes, avoiding prohibitive computational costs.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (9)
  1. O. H. E. Philcox and M. M. Ivanov, BOSS DR12 full-shape cosmology: ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM constraints from the large-scale galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum monopole, Phys. Rev. D 105, 043517 (2022), arXiv:2112.04515 [astro-ph.CO] .
  2. N. Jeffrey, J. Alsing, and F. Lanusse, Likelihood-free inference with neural compression of DES SV weak lensing map statistics, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 501, 954 (2021).
  3. K. Cranmer, J. Brehmer, and G. Louppe, The frontier of simulation-based inference, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 30055 (2020), https://www.pnas.org/content/117/48/30055.full.pdf .
  4. G. Cabass, M. Simonović, and M. Zaldarriaga, Cosmological Information in Perturbative Forward Modeling,   (2023), arXiv:2307.04706 [astro-ph.CO] .
  5. M. M. Ivanov, M. Simonović, and M. Zaldarriaga, Cosmological parameters from the BOSS galaxy power spectrum, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020, 042.
  6. C. Modi, S.-F. Chen, and M. White, Simulations and symmetries, MNRAS 492, 5754 (2020), arXiv:1910.07097 [astro-ph.CO] .
  7. V. Springel, The Cosmological simulation code GADGET-2, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 364, 1105 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0505010 .
  8. J. J. M. Carrasco, M. P. Hertzberg, and L. Senatore, The Effective Field Theory of Cosmological Large Scale Structures, JHEP 09, 082, arXiv:1206.2926 [astro-ph.CO] .
  9. F. Lanusse, A. Rassat, and J. L. Starck, Spherical 3D isotropic wavelets, A&A 540, A92 (2012), arXiv:1112.0561 [astro-ph.CO] .
Citations (6)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Whiteboard

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.