Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

An examination of the hierarchy problem beyond the Standard Model

Published 18 Sep 2023 in physics.gen-ph | (2309.09762v4)

Abstract: As the Higgs field is a weak isospin doublet of the SU(2) symmetry, the Standard Model requires any symmetry solution to the Higgs hierarchy problem to be SU(2) invariant, a constraint on the type of the symmetry. However, the hierarchy problem is about the size. The size of SU(2) for the Higgs boson can be calculated by $|$SU$2(\ell)|=\ell3-\ell$, having the Higgs mass $M_H=1/\ell{H}\approx125$ GeV. To find the origin of the relative smallness of the Higgs mass in Planck units, alternatively, we search for the origin of such a large order assuming that it stems from an unknown field theory X beyond the Standard Model. Accordingly, this order, which corresponds to the quantum of the Higgs field, should determine the order of quantum/core of X symmetry, its automorphism group. We calculate $|$Aut(X)$|\approx8.2\times 10{53}$, close to the order of the Monster sporadic group, $|\mathbb M|\approx 8.1\times 10{53}$, the automorphism group of the Monster CFT, which we therefore conjecture to be X. To examine this conjecture, we calculate the mass of a scalar boson whose SU(2) order is determined by $|\mathbb M|$, observing a 125.4 GeV boson mass and a 245.7 GeV VEV. The Monster CFT does not have any spin-1 operators and Kac-Moody symmetry. Therefore, based on the CFT/(A)dS correspondences, it only describes pure gravity without the gauge fields. In search of a gauge theory candidate, we promote SU(2) (double cover of SO(3)), to SO($d$), and show that the same $\mathbb M$-symmetric vacuum configuration reaches the Planck mass of quantum gravity precisely at $d=32$ (with 99\% accuracy). Then, the spin-1 boson mass of the eligible gauge candidates, SO(32) and $E_8\times E_8$, is calculated to be 80.9 GeV. Further, several pieces of evidence are provided supporting the conjecture.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. Edward Witten. Quantum gravity in de sitter space. arXiv preprint hep-th/0106109, 2001.
  2. Edward Witten. Three-dimensional gravity revisited. arXiv preprint arXiv:0706.3359, 2007.
  3. Tom Banks. Cosmological breaking of supersymmetry? International Journal of Modern Physics A, 16(05):910–921, 2001.
  4. Willy Fischler. Taking de sitter seriously. Talk given at role of scaling laws in physics and biology (Celebrating the 60th birthday of Geoffrey West), Santa Fe, 19, 2000.
  5. Gerard’t Hooft. Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity. arXiv preprint gr-qc/9310026, 1993.
  6. Leonard Susskind. The world as a hologram. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 36(11):6377–6396, 1995.
  7. Andrew Strominger. The ds/cft correspondence. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2001(10):034, 2001.
  8. Aspects of quantum gravity in de sitter spaces. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2004(11):006, 2004.
  9. Strings on orbifolds. Nuclear Physics B, 261:678–686, 1985.
  10. Strings on orbifolds (ii). Nuclear Physics B, 274(2):285–314, 1986.
  11. Lectures on the string landscape and the swampland. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06187, 2022.
  12. Monstrous moonshine. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 11(3):308–339, 1979.
  13. A natural representation of the fischer-griess monster with the modular function J𝐽{J}italic_J as character. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 81(10):3256–3260, 1984.
  14. Terry Gannon. Moonshine beyond the Monster: The bridge connecting algebra, modular forms and physics. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  15. Snowmass white paper: Moonshine. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.13321, 2022.
  16. Beauty and the beast: superconformal symmetry in a monster module. Communications in mathematical physics, 119:221–241, 1988.
  17. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster. Academic press, 1989.
  18. Universal semiclassical equations based on the quantum metric for a two-band system. Physical Review B, 104(13):134312, 2021.
  19. Edward Witten. Symmetry and emergence. Nature Physics, 14(2):116–119, 2018.
  20. Roger W Carter. Simple groups of Lie type, volume 22. John Wiley & Sons, 1989.
  21. Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model higgs boson with the atlas detector at the lhc. Physics Letters B, 716(1):1–29, 2012.
  22. Atlas of finite group representations, 1999.
  23. Conformal field theories with sporadic group symmetry. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 388:1–105, 2021.
  24. Planck 2013 results. xvi. cosmological parameters. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2014.
  25. Notes on the k3 surface and the mathieu group m 24. Experimental Mathematics, 20(1):91–96, 2011.
  26. A twist in the m⁢_𝑚_m\_italic_m _{24242424} moonshine story. Confluentes Mathematici, 7(1):83–113, 2015.
  27. Jacques Tits. Sur les analogues algébriques des groupes semi-simples complexes. In Colloque d’algebre supérieure, tenua Bruxelles du, volume 19, pages 261–289, 1956.
  28. Statistical theory of equations of state and phase transitions. i. theory of condensation. Physical Review, 87(3):404, 1952.
  29. Statistical theory of equations of state and phase transitions. ii. lattice gas and ising model. Physical Review, 87(3):410, 1952.
  30. Peter Minkowski. μ𝜇\muitalic_μ→ eγ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ at a rate of one out of 109 muon decays? Physics Letters B, 67(4):421–428, 1977.
Citations (1)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.