Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Microscopic optical potentials for medium-mass isotopes derived at the first order of the Watson multiple scattering theory

Published 8 Sep 2023 in nucl-th and nucl-ex | (2309.04226v2)

Abstract: We perform a first-principle calculation of optical potentials for nucleon elastic scattering off medium-mass isotopes. Fully based on a saturating chiral Hamiltonian, the optical potentials are derived by folding nuclear density distributions computed with ab initio self-consistent Green's function theory with a nucleon-nucleon tt matrix computed with a consistent chiral interaction. The dependence on the folding interaction as well as the convergence of the target densities are investigated. Numerical results are presented and discussed for differential cross sections and analyzing powers, with focus on elastic proton scattering off Calcium and Nickel isotopes. Our optical potentials generally show a remarkable agreement with the available experimental data for laboratory energies in the range 65-200 MeV. We study the evolution of the scattering observables with increasing proton-neutron asymmetry by computing theoretical predictions of the cross section and analyzing power over the Calcium and Nickel isotopic chains.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. C. Hebborn et al., J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 50, 060501 (2023).
  2. H. Feshbach, Annals of Physics 5, 357 (1958).
  3. P. Hodgson, The Optical Model of Elastic Scattering (Clarendon Press, 1963).
  4. A. Koning and J. Delaroche, Nuclear Physics A 713, 231 (2003).
  5. H. Feshbach, Annals of Physics 19, 287 (1962).
  6. K. M. Watson, Phys. Rev. 105, 1388 (1957).
  7. C. Barbieri and B. K. Jennings, Phys. Rev. C 72, 014613 (2005).
  8. J. Rotureau, Front. in Phys. 8, 285 (2020), arXiv:2007.11913 [nucl-th] .
  9. V. Durant and P. Capel, Phys. Rev. C 105, 014606 (2022).
  10. M. Kohno, Phys. Rev. C 98, 054617 (2018).
  11. M. Kohno, Phys. Rev. C 102, 024611 (2020).
  12. W. Dickhoff and R. Charity, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 105, 252 (2019).
  13. V. Somà, Frontiers in Physics 8 (2020), 10.3389/fphy.2020.00340.
  14. F. Capuzzi and C. Mahaux, Annals of Physics 245, 147 (1996).
  15. L. Cederbaum, Annals of Physics 291, 169 (2001).
  16. J. Escher and B. K. Jennings, Phys. Rev. C 66, 034313 (2002).
  17. D. R. Entem and R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 68, 041001 (2003).
  18. W. H. Dickhoff and C. Barbieri, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 52, 377 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0402034 .
  19. C. Barbieri and A. Carbone, Lect. Notes Phys. 936, 571 (2017), arXiv:1611.03923 [nucl-th] .
  20. W. B. Riesenfeld and K. M. Watson, Phys. Rev. 102, 1157 (1956).
  21. C. Elster and P. C. Tandy, Phys. Rev. C 40, 881 (1989).
  22. G. W. Hoffmann et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1436 (1981).
  23. J. Schirmer, Many-Body Methods for Atoms, Molecules and Clusters (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018).
  24. F. Raimondi and C. Barbieri, Phys. Rev. C 97, 054308 (2018).
  25. U. van Kolck, Front. in Phys. 8, 79 (2020).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.