Score and Rank Semi-Monotonicity for Closeness, Betweenness and Harmonic Centrality
Abstract: In the study of the behavior of centrality measures with respect to network modifications, score monotonicity means that adding an arc increases the centrality score of the target of the arc; rank monotonicity means that adding an arc improves the importance of the target of the arc relative to the remaining nodes. It is known that score and rank monotonicity hold in directed graphs for almost all centrality measures. In undirected graphs one expects that the corresponding properties (where both endpoints of the new edge enjoy the increase in score/rank) hold when adding a new edge. However, recent results have shown that in undirected networks this is not true: for many centrality measures, it is possible to find situations where adding an edge reduces the rank of one of its two endpoints. In this paper we introduce a weaker condition for undirected networks, semi-monotonicity, in which just one of the endpoints of a new edge is required to enjoy score or rank monotonicity. We show that this condition is satisfied by closeness and betweenness centrality, and that harmonic centrality satisfies it in an even stronger sense.
- Anthonisse, J.M.: The rush in a directed graph. Journal of Computational Physics pp. 1–10 (1971)
- Bavelas, A.: A mathematical model for group structures. Human Organization 7, 16–30 (1948)
- Bavelas, A.: Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 22, 725–730 (1950)
- Beauchamp, M.A.: An improved index of centrality. Behavioral Science 10(2), 161–163 (1965)
- Network Science p. 1–23 (2023). DOI 10.1017/nws.2022.42
- Network Science 5(4), 529–550 (2017). DOI 10.1017/nws.2017.21
- Internet Mathematics 10, 222 – 262 (2014)
- Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1, 215–239 (1978)
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper.