Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Missing Data Imputation Based on Dynamically Adaptable Structural Equation Modeling with Self-Attention

Published 23 Aug 2023 in cs.LG | (2308.12388v4)

Abstract: Addressing missing data in complex datasets including electronic health records (EHR) is critical for ensuring accurate analysis and decision-making in healthcare. This paper proposes dynamically adaptable structural equation modeling (SEM) using a self-attention method (SESA), an approach to data imputation in EHR. SESA innovates beyond traditional SEM-based methods by incorporating self-attention mechanisms, thereby enhancing model adaptability and accuracy across diverse EHR datasets. Such enhancement allows SESA to dynamically adjust and optimize imputation and overcome the limitations of static SEM frameworks. Our experimental analyses demonstrate the achievement of robust predictive SESA performance for effectively handling missing data in EHR. Moreover, the SESA architecture not only rectifies potential mis-specifications in SEM but also synergizes with causal discovery algorithms to refine its imputation logic based on underlying data structures. Such features highlight its capabilities and broadening applicational potential in EHR data analysis and beyond, marking a reasonable leap forward in the field of data imputation.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. K. J. M. Janssen, A. R. T. Donders, F. E. Harrell, Y. Vergouwe, Q. Chen, D. E. Grobbee, and K. G. M. Moons, “Missing covariate data in medical research: to impute is better than to ignore.” Journal of clinical epidemiology, vol. 63 7, pp. 721–7, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:38075961
  2. D. B. Rubin, “Inference and missing data,” Psychometrika, vol. 1975, p. 19, 1975. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:120971461
  3. C. K. Enders and D. L. Bandalos, “The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models,” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 8, pp. 430 – 457, 2001. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:33752188
  4. J. L. Schafer and J. W. Graham, “Missing data: our view of the state of the art.” Psychological methods, vol. 7 2, pp. 147–77, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:7745507
  5. N. A. Lazar, “Statistical analysis with missing data,” Technometrics, vol. 45, pp. 364 – 365, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:40372606
  6. S. Fielding, P. M. Fayers, J. H. Loge, M. S. Jordhøy, and S. Kaasa, “Methods for handling missing data in palliative care research.” Palliat Med, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 791–798, Dec 2006.
  7. J. W. Graham, “Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world.” Annual review of psychology, vol. 60, pp. 549–76, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:8417694
  8. A. N. Baraldi and C. K. Enders, “An introduction to modern missing data analyses.” J Sch Psychol, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 5–37, Feb 2010.
  9. I. R. White, P. Royston, and A. M. Wood, “Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 30, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:37379599
  10. Y. Dong and C.-Y. J. Peng, “Principled missing data methods for researchers,” SpringerPlus, vol. 2, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:17840217
  11. P. Li, E. A. Stuart, and D. B. Allison, “Multiple Imputation: A Flexible Tool for Handling Missing Data,” JAMA, vol. 314, no. 18, pp. 1966–1967, 11 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.15281
  12. G. L. Mazza, C. K. Enders, and L. S. Ruehlman, “Addressing item-level missing data: A comparison of proration and full information maximum likelihood estimation,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 504–519, 2015, pMID: 26610249. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1068157
  13. C. K. Enders, “Multiple imputation as a flexible tool for missing data handling in clinical research.” Behav Res Ther, vol. 98, pp. 4–18, Nov 2017.
  14. T. D. Nelson, R. L. Brock, S. Yokum, C. C. Tomaso, C. R. Savage, and E. Stice, “Much ado about missingness: A demonstration of full information maximum likelihood estimation to address missingness in functional magnetic resonance imaging data,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 15, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.746424
  15. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. u. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, I. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett, Eds., vol. 30.   Curran Associates, Inc., 2017. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf
  16. L. Chen, J. Su, T. W. Lam, and R. Luo, “Exploring pair-aware triangular attention for biomedical relation extraction,” Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:263623066
  17. P. D. Allison, “Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling.” J Abnorm Psychol, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 545–557, Nov 2003.
  18. D. L. Schminkey, T. von Oertzen, and L. F. C. Bullock, “Handling missing data with multilevel structural equation modeling and full information maximum likelihood techniques.” Research in nursing & health, vol. 39 4, pp. 286–97, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:3353670
  19. A. A. Igolkina and G. Meshcheryakov, “semopy: A python package for structural equation modeling,” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 952–963, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1704289
  20. X. Zheng, B. Aragam, P. Ravikumar, and E. P. Xing, “Dags with no tears: Continuous optimization for structure learning,” in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:53217974

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

GitHub

  1. GitHub - oudeng/SESA (4 stars)  

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.