Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Startup Acquisitions: Acquihires and Talent Hoarding

Published 19 Aug 2023 in econ.GN and q-fin.EC | (2308.10046v6)

Abstract: We study how competitive forces may drive firms to inefficiently acquire startup talent. In our model, two rival firms have the capacity to acquire and integrate a startup operating in an orthogonal market. We show that firms may pursue such acquihires primarily as a preemptive strategy, even when they appear unprofitable in isolation. Thus, acquihires, even absent traditional competition-reducing effects, need not be benign, as they can lead to inefficient talent allocation. Additionally, our analysis underscores that such talent hoarding can diminish consumer surplus and exacerbate job volatility for acquihired employees.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (54)
  1. Affeldt, P. and R. Kesler (2021a): “Big Tech Acquisitions – Towards Empirical Evidence,” Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 12, 471–478.
  2. ——— (2021b): “Competitors’ Reactions to Big Tech Acquisitions: Evidence from Mobile Apps,” DIW Berlin Discussion Paper No. 1987.
  3. Arora, A., A. Fosfuri, and A. Gambardella (2001): “Markets for Technology and Their Implications for Corporate Strategy,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 419–451.
  4. Bao, R. and J. Eeckhout (2023): “Killer Innovation,” Mimeo.
  5. Bar-Isaac, H., J. P. Johnson, and V. Nocke (2023): “Acquihiring for Monopsony Power,” Unpublished manuscript.
  6. Barnett, J. (2023): ““Killer Acquisitions” Reexamined: Economic Hyperbole in the Age of Populist Antitrust,” USC CLASS Research Paper No. 23-1.
  7. Biddle, J. E. (2014): “Retrospectives: The Cyclical Behavior of Labor Productivity and the Emergence of the Labor Hoarding Concept,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28, 197–212.
  8. Bryan, K. A. and E. Hovenkamp (2020a): “Antitrust Limits on Startup Acquisitions,” Review of Industrial Organization, 56, 615–636.
  9. ——— (2020b): “Startup Acquisitions, Error Costs, and Antitrust Policy,” The University of Chicago Law Review, 87, 331–356.
  10. Burguet, R. and J. Sákovics (2017): “Competitive Foreclosure,” The RAND Journal of Economics, 48, 906–926.
  11. Cabral, L. (2018): “Standing on the Shoulders of Dwarfs: Dominant Firms and Innovation Incentives,” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 13115.
  12. ——— (2020): “Merger Policy in Digital Industries,” Information Economics and Policy.
  13. ——— (2023): “Big Tech Acquisitions,” Mimeo.
  14. Callander, S. and N. Matouschek (2022): “The Novelty of Innovation: Competition, Disruption, and Antitrust Policy,” Management Science, 68, 37–51.
  15. Chen, D., H. Gao, and Y. Ma (2021): “Human Capital-Driven Acquisition: Evidence from the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine,” Management Science, 67, 4643–4664.
  16. Chen, J., S. Hshieh, and F. Zhang (2022): “Hiring High-Skilled Labor through Mergers and Acquisitions,” Available at SSRN 4134426.
  17. Coyle, J. F. and G. D. Polsky (2013): “Acqui-Hiring,” Duke Law Journal, 63, 281–346.
  18. Cunningham, C., F. Ederer, and S. Ma (2021): “Killer Acquisitions,” Journal of Political Economy, 129, 649–702.
  19. Denicolo, V. and M. Polo (2021): “Acquisitions, Innovation and the Entrenchment of Monopoly,” Available at SSRN 3988255.
  20. Dijk, E., J. L. Moraga-González, and E. Motchenkova (2021): “How Do Start-up Acquisitions Affect the Direction of Innovation?” CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP16362.
  21. Ederer, F. and B. Pellegrino (2023): “The Great Start-up Sellout and the Rise of Oligopoly,” AEA Papers and Proceedings, 113, 274–278.
  22. Eisfeld, L. (2022): “Entry and Acquisitions in Software Markets,” Working Paper, Toulouse School of Economics.
  23. European Commission (2021): “Commission Guidance on the Application of the Referral Mechanism Set Out in Article 22 of the Merger Regulation to Certain Categories of Cases,” https://ec.europa.eu/competition/consultations/2021_merger_control/guidance_article_22_referrals.pdf.
  24. Fosfuri, A., M. Motta, and T. Rønde (2001): “Foreign Direct Investment and Spillovers Through Workers’ Mobility,” Journal of International Economics, 53, 205–222.
  25. FTC (2020): “FTC to Examine Past Acquisitions by Large Technology Companies,” https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2020/02/ftc-examine-past-acquisitions-large-technology-companies.
  26. Fumagalli, C., M. Motta, and E. Tarantino (2023): “Shelving or Developing? Optimal policy for Mergers with Potential Competitors,” Mimeo.
  27. Gans, J. S. and S. Stern (2000): “Incumbency and R&D Incentives: Licensing the Gale of Creative Destruction,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 9, 485–511.
  28. Gautier, A. and J. Lamesch (2021): “Mergers in the Digital Economy,” Information Economics and Policy, 54, 100890.
  29. Gersbach, H. and A. Schmutzler (2003a): “Endogenous Spillovers and Incentives to Innovate,” Economic Theory, 21, 59–79.
  30. ——— (2003b): “Endogenous Technological Spillovers: Causes and Consequences,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12, 179–205.
  31. Gilbert, R. J. and D. M. Newbery (1982): “Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly,” The American Economic Review, 514–526.
  32. Haegele, I. (2022): “Talent Hoarding in Organizations,” Available at arXiv preprint, arXiv:2206.15098.
  33. Hollenbeck, B. (2020): “Horizontal Mergers and Innovation in Concentrated Industries,” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 18, 1–37.
  34. Jin, G. Z., M. Leccese, and L. Wagman (2023): “How Do Top Acquirers Compare in Technology Mergers? New Evidence from an SP Taxonomy,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 89, 102891.
  35. Jovanovic, B. (1979): “Job Matching and the Theory of Turnover,” Journal of Political Economy, 87, 972–990.
  36. Katz, M. L. (2021): “Big Tech Mergers: Innovation, Competition for the Market, and the Acquisition of Emerging Competitors,” Information Economics and Policy, 54, 100883.
  37. Katz, M. L. and C. Shapiro (1987): “R&D Rivalry with Licensing or Imitation,” The American Economic Review, 402–420.
  38. Kim, J. D. (2020): “Startup Acquisitions As a Hiring Strategy: Worker Choice and Turnover,” Available at SSRN 3252784.
  39. ——— (2022): “Startup Acquisitions, Relocation, and Employee Entrepreneurship,” Strategic Management Journal, 43, 2189–2216.
  40. Letina, I., A. Schmutzler, and R. Seibel (2023): “Killer Acquisitions and Beyond: Policy Effects on Innovation Strategies,” International Economic Review, forthcoming.
  41. Loh, J., P. Khashabi, J. Claussen, and T. Kretschmer (2019): “Disruption, Specialization and Employee Exit: Vertical Acquisitions in the US Video Game Industry,” Available at SSRN 3354763.
  42. Mason, R. and H. Weeds (2013): “Merger Policy, Entry, and Entrepreneurship,” European Economic Review, 57, 23–38.
  43. Motta, M. and M. Peitz (2021): “Big Tech Mergers,” Information Economics and Policy, 54, 100868.
  44. Ng, W. and T. E. Stuart (2021): “Acquired Employees Versus Hired Employees: Retained or Turned Over?” Strategic Management Journal, 43, 1025–1045.
  45. Norbäck, P.-J. and L. Persson (2004): “Privatization and Foreign Competition,” Journal of International Economics, 62, 409–416.
  46. ——— (2007): “Investment Liberalization – Why A Restrictive Cross-Border Merger Policy Can Be Counterproductive,” Journal of International Economics, 72, 366–380.
  47. ——— (2012): “Entrepreneurial Innovations, Competition and Competition Policy,” European Economic Review, 56, 488–506.
  48. Ouimet, P. and R. Zarutskie (2020): “Acquiring Labor,” Quarterly Journal of Finance, 10, 2050011.
  49. Prado, T. S. and J. M. Bauer (2022): “Big Tech Platform Acquisitions of Start-ups and Venture Capital Funding for Innovation,” Information Economics and Policy, 59, 100973.
  50. Rasmusen, E. (1988): “Entry for Buyout,” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 36, 281–299.
  51. Selby, J. and K. J. Mayer (2013): “Startup Firm Acquisitions As a Human Resource Strategy for Innovation: The Acqhire Phenomenon,” Working Paper.
  52. Shelegia, S. and M. Motta (2021): “The “Kill Zone”: Copying, Acquisition and Start-ups’ Direction of Innovation,” CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP16151.
  53. Teh, C., D. Banerjee, and C. Wang (2022): “Acquisition-Induced Kill Zone,” Monash University, Department of Economics Discussion Paper No. 2022-24.
  54. Verginer, L., F. Parisi, J. v. L. de Jeude, and M. Riccaboni (2022): “The Impact of Acquisitions on Inventors’ Turnover in the Biotechnology Industry,” Mimeo.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free