Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

$(g-2)_μ$ and Stau coannihilation : Dark Matter and Collider Analysis

Published 10 Aug 2023 in hep-ph | (2308.05723v2)

Abstract: Slepton coannihilation is one of the most promising scenarios that can bring the predicted Dark Matter (DM) abundance in the the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) into agreement with the experimental observation. In this scenario, the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP), usually assumed to be the lightest neutralino, can serve as a Dark Matter (DM) candidate while the sleptons as the next-to-LSPs (NLSPs) lie close in mass. In our previous studies analyzing the electroweak (EW) sector of MSSM, a degeneracy between the three generations of sleptons was assumed for the sake of simplicity. In case of slepton coannihilation this directly links the smuons involved in the explanation for $(g-2)\mu$ to the coannihilating NLSPs required to explain the DM content of the universe. On the other hand, in well-motivated top-down models such degeneracy does not hold, and often the lighter stau turns out to be the NLSP at the EW scale, with the smuons (and selectrons) somewhat heavier. In this paper we analyze a non-universal slepton mass scenario at the EW scale where the first two generations of sleptons are taken to be mass-degenerate and heavier than the staus, enforcing stau coannihilation. We analyze the parameter space of the MSSM in the light of a variety of experimental data namely, the DM relic density and direct detection (DD) limits, LHC data and especially, the discrepancy between the experimental result for $(g-2)\mu$, and its Standard Model (SM) prediction. We find an upper limit on the LSP and NLSP masses of about ~ 550 GeV. In contrast to the scenario with full degeneracy among the three families of sleptons, the upper limit on the light smuon/selectron mass moves up by ~ 200 GeV. We analyze the DD prospects as well as the physics potential of the HL-LHC and a future high-energy $e+ e-$ collider to investigate this scenario further.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. H. Nilles, Phys. Rept. 110 (1984) 1.
  2. R. Barbieri, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 11 (1988) 1.
  3. H. Goldberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 1419.
  4. C. Han, [arXiv:2104.03292 [hep-ph]].
  5. S. Chapman, [arXiv:2112.04469 [hep-ph]].
  6. R. Dermisek, [arXiv:2201.06179 [hep-ph]].
  7. R. Masełek, [arXiv:2205.04378 [hep-ph]].
  8. S. Heinemeyer, [arXiv:2207.14809 [hep-ph]].
  9. See: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/ SupersymmetryPublicResults .
  10. See: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsSUS .
  11. S. Heinemeyer and F. von der Pahlen, [arXiv:2302.12187 [hep-ph]].
  12. CMS, [arXiv:2207.02254 [hep-ex]].
  13. [ATLAS], ATLAS-CONF-2023-029.
  14. J. J. Heinrich [ATLAS], PhD thesis: “Search for charged stable massive particles with the ATLAS detector,” doi:10.5282/edoc.22183.
  15. T. R. Slatyer, [arXiv:1710.05137 [hep-ph]].
  16. [CMS], arXiv:2208.02717 [hep-ex].
  17. [CMS], CMS-PAS-EXO-16-036.
  18. M. Berggren, [arXiv:1308.1461 [hep-ph]].
  19. M. Berggren, [arXiv:2003.12391 [hep-ph]].
Citations (2)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 3 likes about this paper.