Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Multi-particle correlations, cumulants, and moments sensitive to fluctuations in rare-probe azimuthal anisotropy in heavy ion collisions

Published 31 Jul 2023 in nucl-th and nucl-ex | (2307.16796v2)

Abstract: Correlations of two or more particles have been an essential tool for understanding the hydrodynamic behavior of the quark-gluon plasma created in ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions. In this paper, we extend that framework to introduce a mathematical construction of multi-particle correlators that utilize correlations between arbitrary numbers of particles of interest (e.g. particles selected for their strangeness, heavy flavor, and conserved charges) and inclusive reference particles to estimate the azimuthal anisotropies of rare probes. To estimate the fluctuations and correlations in the azimuthal anisotropies of these particle of interest, we use these correlators in a system of cumulants, raw moments, and central moments. We finally introduce two classes of observables that can compare the fluctuations in the azimuthal anisotropies of particles of interest with reference particles at each order.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (99)
  1. Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 68:339–376, 2018. arXiv:1802.04801, doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-020852.
  2. Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 63:123–151, 2013. arXiv:1301.2826, doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102212-170540.
  3. Initial State Fluctuations and Final State Correlations in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions. J. Phys. G, 41:063102, 2014. arXiv:1312.5503, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/41/6/063102.
  4. Hydrodynamic Approaches in Relativistic Heavy Ion Reactions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 86:35–85, 2016. arXiv:1506.03863, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2015.09.002.
  5. A New method for measuring azimuthal distributions in nucleus-nucleus collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 63:054906, 2001. arXiv:nucl-th/0007063, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.63.054906.
  6. Flow analysis from multiparticle azimuthal correlations. Phys. Rev. C, 64:054901, 2001. arXiv:nucl-th/0105040, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.64.054901.
  7. Flow analysis with cumulants: Direct calculations. Phys. Rev. C, 83:044913, 2011. arXiv:1010.0233, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.83.044913.
  8. Generic framework for anisotropic flow analyses with multiparticle azimuthal correlations. Phys. Rev. C, 89(6):064904, 2014. arXiv:1312.3572, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.89.064904.
  9. Georges Aad et al. Measurement of flow harmonics with multi-particle cumulants in Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=2.76subscript𝑠NN2.76\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Eur. Phys. J. C, 74(11):3157, 2014. arXiv:1408.4342, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3157-z.
  10. Betty Bezverkhny Abelev et al. Multiparticle azimuthal correlations in p -Pb and Pb-Pb collisions at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. C, 90(5):054901, 2014. arXiv:1406.2474, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.054901.
  11. Serguei Chatrchyan et al. Multiplicity and Transverse Momentum Dependence of Two- and Four-Particle Correlations in pPb and PbPb Collisions. Phys. Lett. B, 724:213–240, 2013. arXiv:1305.0609, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.06.028.
  12. L. Adamczyk et al. Azimuthal anisotropy in U+++U and Au+++Au collisions at RHIC. Phys. Rev. Lett., 115(22):222301, 2015. arXiv:1505.07812, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.222301.
  13. Morad Aaboud et al. Measurement of long-range multiparticle azimuthal correlations with the subevent cumulant method in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p and p+P⁢b𝑝𝑃𝑏p+Pbitalic_p + italic_P italic_b collisions with the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. C, 97(2):024904, 2018. arXiv:1708.03559, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.024904.
  14. Albert M Sirunyan et al. Non-Gaussian elliptic-flow fluctuations in PbPb collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠NN5.02\sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{{}_{\text{NN}}}}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT NN end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV. Phys. Lett. B, 789:643–665, 2019. arXiv:1711.05594, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.11.063.
  15. Shreyasi Acharya et al. Investigations of Anisotropic Flow Using Multiparticle Azimuthal Correlations in pp, p-Pb, Xe-Xe, and Pb-Pb Collisions at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett., 123(14):142301, 2019. arXiv:1903.01790, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.142301.
  16. Morad Aaboud et al. Fluctuations of anisotropic flow in Pb+Pb collisions at sNNsubscriptsNN\sqrt{{\mathrm{s}}_{\mathrm{NN}}}square-root start_ARG roman_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector. JHEP, 01:051, 2020. arXiv:1904.04808, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)051.
  17. Bayesian estimation of the specific shear and bulk viscosity of quark–gluon plasma. Nature Phys., 15(11):1113–1117, 2019. doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0611-8.
  18. D. Everett et al. Multisystem Bayesian constraints on the transport coefficients of QCD matter. Phys. Rev. C, 103(5):054904, 2021. arXiv:2011.01430, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.054904.
  19. Transverse Momentum Differential Global Analysis of Heavy-Ion Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 126(20):202301, 2021. arXiv:2010.15130, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.202301.
  20. Bayesian estimation of the specific shear and bulk viscosity of the quark-gluon plasma with additional flow harmonic observables. Phys. Rev. C, 104(5):054904, 2021. arXiv:2106.05019, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.104.054904.
  21. Bayesian quantification of strongly-interacting matter with color glass condensate initial conditions. 2 2023. arXiv:2302.09478.
  22. Effect of the QCD equation of state and strange hadronic resonances on multiparticle correlations in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 98(3):034909, 2018. arXiv:1711.05207, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.98.034909.
  23. Running the gamut of high energy nuclear collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 102(4):044905, 2020. arXiv:2005.14682, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.044905.
  24. K. Aamodt et al. Higher harmonic anisotropic flow measurements of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sN⁢Nsubscript𝑠𝑁𝑁\sqrt{s_{NN}}square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG=2.76 TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107:032301, 2011. arXiv:1105.3865, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.032301.
  25. Serguei Chatrchyan et al. Measurement of the elliptic anisotropy of charged particles produced in PbPb collisions at sN⁢Nsubscript𝑠𝑁𝑁\sqrt{s}_{NN}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=2.76 TeV. Phys. Rev. C, 87(1):014902, 2013. arXiv:1204.1409, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.014902.
  26. Morad Aaboud et al. Measurement of multi-particle azimuthal correlations in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p, p+limit-from𝑝p+italic_p +Pb and low-multiplicity Pb+++Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector. Eur. Phys. J. C, 77(6):428, 2017. arXiv:1705.04176, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4988-1.
  27. Mohamed Abdallah et al. Collision-System and Beam-Energy Dependence of Anisotropic Flow Fluctuations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 129(25):252301, 2022. arXiv:2201.10365, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.252301.
  28. Constraints from v2subscript𝑣2v_{2}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT fluctuations for the initial-state geometry of heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 89(6):064907, 2014. arXiv:1401.2069, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.89.064907.
  29. Relative flow fluctuations as a probe of initial state fluctuations. Phys. Rev. C, 95(5):054910, 2017. arXiv:1702.01730, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054910.
  30. Possible octupole deformation of 208208{}^{208}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 208 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTPb and the ultracentral v2subscript𝑣2v_{2}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to v3subscript𝑣3v_{3}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT puzzle. Phys. Rev. C, 102(5):054905, 2020. arXiv:2007.00780, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.054905.
  31. Dynamical initial state model for relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 97(2):024907, 2018. arXiv:1710.00881, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.024907.
  32. Initial state fluctuations of QCD conserved charges in heavy-ion collisions. 11 2019. arXiv:1911.10272.
  33. Monte Carlo event generator for initial conditions of conserved charges in nuclear geometry. Phys. Rev. C, 105(3):034908, 2022. arXiv:1911.12454, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105.034908.
  34. Studying the QGP with Jets at the LHC and RHIC. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 124:103940, 2022. arXiv:2110.14490, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103940.
  35. Karen M. Burke et al. Extracting the jet transport coefficient from jet quenching in high-energy heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 90(1):014909, 2014. arXiv:1312.5003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.014909.
  36. Bayesian extraction of jet energy loss distributions in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122(25):252302, 2019. arXiv:1808.05310, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.252302.
  37. QGP modification to single inclusive jets in a calibrated transport model. JHEP, 05:041, 2021. arXiv:2010.13680, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)041.
  38. A. Kumar et al. Inclusive jet and hadron suppression in a multistage approach. Phys. Rev. C, 107(3):034911, 2023. arXiv:2204.01163, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.107.034911.
  39. Xin-Nian Wang. Jet quenching and azimuthal anisotropy of large p(T) spectra in noncentral high-energy heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 63:054902, 2001. arXiv:nucl-th/0009019, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.63.054902.
  40. High p(T) azimuthal asymmetry in noncentral A+A at RHIC. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86:2537–2540, 2001. arXiv:nucl-th/0012092, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2537.
  41. Georges Aad et al. Measurement of the Azimuthal Angle Dependence of Inclusive Jet Yields in Pb+Pb Collisions at sN⁢N=subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁absent\sqrt{s_{NN}}=square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. Lett., 111(15):152301, 2013. arXiv:1306.6469, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.152301.
  42. Jaroslav Adam et al. Azimuthal anisotropy of charged jet production in sNNsubscript𝑠NN\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 2.76 TeV Pb-Pb collisions. Phys. Lett. B, 753:511–525, 2016. arXiv:1509.07334, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12.047.
  43. Georges Aad et al. Measurements of azimuthal anisotropies of jet production in Pb+Pb collisions at sN⁢N=subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁absent\sqrt{s_{NN}}=square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. C, 105(6):064903, 2022. arXiv:2111.06606, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105.064903.
  44. Fluctuating flow angles and anisotropic flow measurements. Phys. Rev. C, 87(3):034913, 2013. arXiv:1302.3535, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.034913.
  45. Mode-coupling effects in anisotropic flow in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 93(6):064901, 2016. arXiv:1602.02813, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.064901.
  46. Differential flow correlations in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 95(5):054908, 2017. arXiv:1703.04077, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054908.
  47. Elastic, inelastic, and path length fluctuations in jet tomography. Nucl. Phys. A, 784:426–442, 2007. arXiv:nucl-th/0512076, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.12.048.
  48. A. Andronic et al. Heavy-flavour and quarkonium production in the LHC era: from proton–proton to heavy-ion collisions. Eur. Phys. J. C, 76(3):107, 2016. arXiv:1506.03981, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3819-5.
  49. Open Heavy-Flavor Production in Heavy-Ion Collisions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 69:417–445, 2019. arXiv:1903.07709, doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101918-023806.
  50. How much do heavy quarks thermalize in a heavy ion collision? Phys. Rev. C, 71:064904, 2005. arXiv:hep-ph/0412346, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.71.064904.
  51. Heavy-quark dynamics and hadronization in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions: Collisional versus radiative energy loss. Phys. Rev. C, 88:044907, 2013. arXiv:1308.0617, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.044907.
  52. Energy loss, hadronization and hadronic interactions of heavy flavors in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 92(2):024907, 2015. arXiv:1505.01413, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.024907.
  53. Sensitivity study with a D and B mesons modular simulation code of heavy flavor RAA and azimuthal anisotropies based on beam energy, initial conditions, hadronization, and suppression mechanisms. Phys. Rev. C, 102(2):024906, 2020. arXiv:1906.10768, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.024906.
  54. Azimuthal correlations of heavy quarks in Pb + Pb collisions at s=2.76𝑠2.76\sqrt{s}=2.76square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 2.76 TeV at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. C, 90(2):024907, 2014. arXiv:1305.3823, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.024907.
  55. Study of collective anisotropies v2subscript𝑣2v_{2}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and v3subscript𝑣3v_{3}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and their fluctuations in p⁢A𝑝𝐴pAitalic_p italic_A collisions at LHC within a relativistic transport approach. Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(1):16, 2020. arXiv:1907.11287, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7577-7.
  56. Event-by-event correlations between soft hadrons and D0superscript𝐷0D^{0}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mesons in 5.02 TeV PbPb collisions at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. C, 96(6):064903, 2017. arXiv:1611.02965, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.96.064903.
  57. Heavy - light flavor correlations of anisotropic flows at LHC energies within event-by-event transport approach. Phys. Lett. B, 805:135460, 2020. arXiv:1912.09350, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135460.
  58. Georges Aad et al. Measurement of azimuthal anisotropy of muons from charm and bottom hadrons in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13𝑠13\sqrt{s}=13square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. Lett., 124(8):082301, 2020. arXiv:1909.01650, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.082301.
  59. Georges Aad et al. Centrality and rapidity dependence of inclusive jet production in sNN=5.02subscript𝑠NN5.02\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV proton-lead collisions with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Lett. B, 748:392–413, 2015. arXiv:1412.4092, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.07.023.
  60. Jaroslav Adam et al. Measurement of charged jet production cross sections and nuclear modification in p-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠NN5.02\sqrt{s_{\textrm{NN}}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV. Phys. Lett. B, 749:68–81, 2015. arXiv:1503.00681, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.07.054.
  61. Albert M Sirunyan et al. Measurements of the charm jet cross section and nuclear modification factor in pPb collisions at sN⁢Nsubscript𝑠𝑁𝑁\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV. Phys. Lett. B, 772:306–329, 2017. arXiv:1612.08972, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.06.053.
  62. Shreyasi Acharya et al. Measurement of inclusive charged-particle b-jet production in pp and p-Pb collisions at sNNsubscript𝑠NN\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV. JHEP, 01:178, 2022. arXiv:2110.06104, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)178.
  63. Cumulants and nonlinear response of high pTsubscript𝑝𝑇p_{T}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT harmonic flow at sN⁢N=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV. Phys. Rev. C, 95(4):044901, 2017. arXiv:1609.05171, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.044901.
  64. Z. Citron et al. Report from Working Group 5: Future physics opportunities for high-density QCD at the LHC with heavy-ion and proton beams. CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr., 7:1159–1410, 2019. arXiv:1812.06772, doi:10.23731/CYRM-2019-007.1159.
  65. sPHENIX Collaboration. sPHENIX Beam Use Proposal, 2022. URL: {https://indico.bnl.gov/event/15148/attachments/40846/68568/sPHENIX_Beam_Use_Proposal_2022.pdf}.
  66. A. M. Sirunyan et al. Azimuthal anisotropy of charged particles with transverse momentum up to 100 GeV/ c in PbPb collisions at sN⁢Nsubscript𝑠𝑁𝑁\sqrt{s}_{{NN}}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=5.02 TeV. Phys. Lett. B, 776:195–216, 2018. arXiv:1702.00630, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.11.041.
  67. Armen Tumasyan et al. Probing Charm Quark Dynamics via Multiparticle Correlations in Pb-Pb Collisions at sNNsubscript𝑠NN\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG =5.02 TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett., 129(2):022001, 2022. arXiv:2112.12236, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.022001.
  68. S. Acharya et al. Observation of flow angle and flow magnitude fluctuations in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. C, 107(5):L051901, 2023. arXiv:2206.04574, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.107.L051901.
  69. Anisotropic flow and flow fluctuations of identified hadrons in Pb−--Pb collisions at sNNsubscript𝑠NN\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV. 6 2022. arXiv:2206.04587.
  70. Georges Aad et al. Measurement of the correlation between flow harmonics of different order in lead-lead collisions at sN⁢Nsubscript𝑠𝑁𝑁\sqrt{s_{NN}}square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG=2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. C, 92(3):034903, 2015. arXiv:1504.01289, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034903.
  71. Shreyasi Acharya et al. Event-shape engineering for the D-meson elliptic flow in mid-central Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠NN5.02\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV. JHEP, 02:150, 2019. arXiv:1809.09371, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)150.
  72. Generic algorithm for multiparticle cumulants of azimuthal correlations in high energy nucleus collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 103(2):024913, 2021. arXiv:2005.07974, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.024913.
  73. Multivariate cumulants in flow analyses: The next generation. Phys. Rev. C, 105(2):024912, 2022. arXiv:2101.05619, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105.024912.
  74. B. Alver and G. Roland. Collision geometry fluctuations and triangular flow in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 81:054905, 2010. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 82, 039903 (2010)]. arXiv:1003.0194, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.82.039903.
  75. Collective phenomena in non-central nuclear collisions. Landolt-Bornstein, 23:293–333, 2010. arXiv:0809.2949, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01539-7_10.
  76. Methods for analyzing anisotropic flow in relativistic nuclear collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 58:1671–1678, 1998. arXiv:nucl-ex/9805001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.58.1671.
  77. Determining initial-state fluctuations from flow measurements in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 84:034910, 2011. arXiv:1104.4740, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.84.034910.
  78. Sergei A. Voloshin. Testing the Chiral Magnetic Effect with Central U+U collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:172301, 2010. arXiv:1006.1020, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.172301.
  79. Georges Aad et al. Measurement of the distributions of event-by-event flow harmonics in lead-lead collisions at = 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. JHEP, 11:183, 2013. arXiv:1305.2942, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2013)183.
  80. Shape and flow fluctuations in ultracentral Pb + Pb collisions at the energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. C, 92(1):014901, 2015. arXiv:1502.04636, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.014901.
  81. Topology studies of hydrodynamics using two particle correlation analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:242301, 2009. arXiv:0902.4870, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.242301.
  82. Triangular flow in hydrodynamics and transport theory. Phys. Rev. C, 82:034913, 2010. arXiv:1007.5469, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.82.034913.
  83. Triangular flow in event-by-event ideal hydrodynamics in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200⁢Asubscript𝑠NN200𝐴\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=200Asquare-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 200 italic_A GeV. Phys. Rev. C, 82:041901, 2010. arXiv:1008.0625, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.82.041901.
  84. Possibility to disentangle anisotropic flow, flow fluctuation, and nonflow assuming Gaussian fluctuations. 1 2011. arXiv:1101.4646.
  85. Li Yan and Jean-Yves Ollitrault. Universal fluctuation-driven eccentricities in proton-proton, proton-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112:082301, 2014. arXiv:1312.6555, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.082301.
  86. Eccentricity distributions in nucleus-nucleus collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 90(2):024903, 2014. arXiv:1405.6595, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.024903.
  87. Serguei Chatrchyan et al. Measurement of Higher-Order Harmonic Azimuthal Anisotropy in PbPb Collisions at sN⁢Nsubscript𝑠𝑁𝑁\sqrt{s_{NN}}square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 2.76 TeV. Phys. Rev. C, 89(4):044906, 2014. arXiv:1310.8651, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.89.044906.
  88. Md. Nasim. Systematic study of symmetric cumulants at sN⁢Nsubscript𝑠𝑁𝑁\sqrt{s_{NN}}square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 200 GeV in Au+Au collision using transport approach. Phys. Rev. C, 95(3):034905, 2017. arXiv:1612.01066, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.034905.
  89. Higher order Symmetric Cumulants. Phys. Rev. C, 102(2):024907, 2020. arXiv:1901.06968, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.024907.
  90. Albert M Sirunyan et al. Pseudorapidity and transverse momentum dependence of flow harmonics in pPb and PbPb collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 98(4):044902, 2018. arXiv:1710.07864, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.98.044902.
  91. Morad Aaboud et al. Measurement of longitudinal flow decorrelations in Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=2.76subscript𝑠NN2.76\sqrt{s_{\text{NN}}}=2.76square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 2.76 and 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Eur. Phys. J. C, 78(2):142, 2018. arXiv:1709.02301, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5605-7.
  92. R Kubo. Generalized cumulant expansion method. J. Phys. Soc. Japan, Vol: 17, 7 1962. URL: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/4764483, doi:10.1143/JPSJ.17.1100.
  93. Systematic procedure for analyzing cumulants at any order. Phys. Rev. C, 95(4):044911, 2017. arXiv:1612.05634, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.044911.
  94. Ante Bilandzic. Anisotropic flow measurements in ALICE at the large hadron collider. PhD thesis, Utrecht U., 2012. URL: http://cds.cern.ch/record/1432210.
  95. Shreyasi Acharya et al. Higher-order correlations between different moments of two flow amplitudes in Pb−--Pb collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠NN5.02\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV. 3 2023. arXiv:2303.13414.
  96. Skewness of elliptic flow fluctuations. Phys. Rev. C, 95(1):014913, 2017. arXiv:1608.01823, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.014913.
  97. P. Achenbach et al. The Present and Future of QCD. 3 2023. arXiv:2303.02579.
  98. M. Arslandok et al. Hot QCD White Paper. 3 2023. arXiv:2303.17254.
  99. Measuring jet energy loss fluctuations in the quark-gluon plasma via multi-particle correlations. in preparation.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.

Sign Up for Free