Engineering 3D Floquet codes by rewinding
Abstract: Floquet codes are a novel class of quantum error-correcting codes with dynamically generated logical qubits arising from a periodic schedule of non-commuting measurements. We utilize the interpretation of measurements in terms of condensation of topological excitations and the rewinding of measurement sequences to engineer new examples of Floquet codes. In particular, rewinding is advantageous for obtaining a desired set of instantaneous stabilizer groups on both toric and planar layouts. Our first example is a Floquet code with instantaneous stabilizer codes that have the same topological order as 3D toric code(s). This Floquet code also exhibits a splitting of the topological order of the 3D toric code under the associated sequence of measurements, i.e., an instantaneous stabilizer group of a single copy of 3D toric code in one round transforms into an instantaneous stabilizer group of two copies of 3D toric codes up to nonlocal stabilizers in the following round. We further construct boundaries for this 3D code and argue that stacking it with two copies of 3D subsystem toric code allows for a transversal implementation of the logical non-Clifford $CCZ$ gate. We also show that the coupled-layer construction of the X-cube Floquet code can be modified by a rewinding schedule such that each of the instantaneous stabilizer codes is finite-depth-equivalent to the X-cube model up to toric codes; the X-cube Floquet code exhibits a splitting of the X-cube model into a copy of the X-cube model and toric codes under the measurement sequence. Our final 3D example is a generalization of the 2D Floquet toric code on the honeycomb lattice to 3D, which has instantaneous stabilizer codes with the same topological order as the 3D fermionic toric code.
- M. B. Hastings and J. Haah, Quantum 5, 564 (2021).
- C. Gidney, M. Newman, and M. McEwen, Quantum 6, 813 (2022).
- J. Haah and M. B. Hastings, Quantum 6, 693 (2022).
- A. Bauer, Topological error correcting processes from fixed-point path integrals (2023), arXiv:2303.16405 [quant-ph] .
- A. Kubica and M. Vasmer, Nature Communications 13, 6272 (2022).
- M. Vasmer and D. E. Browne, Phys. Rev. A 100, 012312 (2019).
- Z. Zhang, D. Aasen, and S. Vijay, Phys. Rev. B 108, 205116 (2023).
- M. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 67, 245316 (2003).
- S. Mandal and N. Surendran, Phys. Rev. B 79, 024426 (2009).
- M. Davydova, N. Tantivasadakarn, and S. Balasubramanian, PRX Quantum 4, 10.1103/prxquantum.4.020341 (2023a).
- In contrast to our Floquet color code, the ISGs of the CSS honeycomb code are FDLQC-equivalent to the 2D TC.
- J. Sullivan, R. Wen, and A. C. Potter, Floquet codes and phases in twist-defect networks (2023), arXiv:2303.17664 [quant-ph] .
- Even though all checks can be interpreted as performing condensations in a parent stabilizer code.
- It can be equivalently written as RGBRBG due to periodicity, and then the correspondence to the 012021 notation mentioned earlier is clear.
- S. Vijay, J. Haah, and L. Fu, Physical Review B 94, 10.1103/physrevb.94.235157 (2016).
- Y.-A. Chen and A. Kapustin, Phys. Rev. B 100, 245127 (2019).
- We note that any 2D lattice can be coarse-grained into a square lattice with a constant number of vertices per unit cell. Since the square lattice is 4-valent, the model can be generalized to a 3D diamond lattice by replacing the sites of the diamond lattice with the unit cell of the square lattice model. The lattice in Fig. 17 can be constructed in this way starting from the honeycomb lattice.
- J. Haah, Phys. Rev. B 89, 075119 (2014).
- Here, we distinguish between the splitting of topological order in our Floquet code examples and the bifurcation of topological order because the former did not happen recursively under the associated dynamics.
- W. Shirley, K. Slagle, and X. Chen, SciPost Phys. 6, 041 (2019).
- G. Zhu, T. Jochym-O’Connor, and A. Dua, PRX Quantum 3, 030338 (2022).
- A. Dua, T. Jochym-O’Connor, and G. Zhu, Quantum 7, 1122 (2023).
- A. Lavasani, Z.-X. Luo, and S. Vijay, Phys. Rev. B 108, 115135 (2023).
- A. Townsend-Teague, J. Magdalena de la Fuente, and M. Kesselring, Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 384, 265–303 (2023).
- H. Bombin, Phys. Rev. A 81, 032301 (2010).
- P. Sarvepalli and K. R. Brown, Phys. Rev. A 86, 042336 (2012).
- B. Yoshida, Phys. Rev. B 91, 245131 (2015).
- A. Kubica and M. E. Beverland, Phys. Rev. A 91, 032330 (2015).
- H. Bombin, Gauge color codes: Optimal transversal gates and gauge fixing in topological stabilizer codes (2015), arXiv:1311.0879 [quant-ph] .
- J. Haah, Lattice quantum codes and exotic topological phases of matter (2013), arXiv:1305.6973 [quant-ph] .
- See Supplementary Mathematica files here: https://github.com/dua-arpit/floquetcodes.
- H. Bombin, M. Kargarian, and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Physical Review B 80, 10.1103/physrevb.80.075111 (2009).
- H. Bombin, G. Duclos-Cianci, and D. Poulin, New Journal of Physics 14, 73048 (2012).
- H. Bombin, Communications in Mathematical Physics 327, 387 (2014).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.