Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Complex-valued Adaptive System Identification via Low-Rank Tensor Decomposition (2306.16428v1)

Published 28 Jun 2023 in cs.LG, math.ST, and stat.TH

Abstract: Machine learning (ML) and tensor-based methods have been of significant interest for the scientific community for the last few decades. In a previous work we presented a novel tensor-based system identification framework to ease the computational burden of tensor-only architectures while still being able to achieve exceptionally good performance. However, the derived approach only allows to process real-valued problems and is therefore not directly applicable on a wide range of signal processing and communications problems, which often deal with complex-valued systems. In this work we therefore derive two new architectures to allow the processing of complex-valued signals, and show that these extensions are able to surpass the trivial, complex-valued extension of the original architecture in terms of performance, while only requiring a slight overhead in computational resources to allow for complex-valued operations.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. W. Liu, Z. Wang, X. Liu, N. Zeng, Y. Liu, and F. E. Alsaadi, “A survey of deep neural network architectures and their applications,” Neurocomputing, vol. 234, pp. 11–26, April 2017.
  2. K. Burse, R. N. Yadav, and S. C. Shrivastava, “Channel equalization using neural networks: A review,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 352–357, November 2010.
  3. O. Ploder, O. Lang, T. Paireder, and M. Huemer, “An adaptive machine learning based approach for the cancellation of second-order-intermodulation distortions in 4g/5g transceivers,” In Proceedings of the 90th Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC Fall 2019.   Honolulu, USA: IEEE, September 2019, pp. 1–7.
  4. O. Ploder, C. Motz, T. Paireder, and M. Huemer, “A neural network approach for the cancellation of the second-order-intermodulation distortion in future cellular rf transceivers,” In Proceedings of the 53rd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers - ACSSC 2019, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, November 2019, pp. 1144–1148.
  5. C. Auer, K. Kostoglou, T. Paireder, O. Ploder, and M. Huemer, “Support vector machines for self-interference cancellation in mobile communication transceivers,” accepted for publication in 91st Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC Spring2020.   Antwerp, Belgium: IEEE, May 2020.
  6. A. J. Smola and B. Schölkopf, “A tutorial on support vector regression,” Statistics and Computing, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 199–222, August 2004. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88.
  7. C. Auer, A. Gebhard, C. Motz, T. Paireder, O. Ploder, R. Sunil Kanumalli, A. Melzer, O. Lang, and M. Huemer, “Kernel adaptive filters: A panacea for self-interference cancellation in mobile communication transceivers?” In Proceedings of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS): Computer Aided Systems Theory - EUROCAST 2019, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, February 2019, pp. 36–43.
  8. M. A. H. Shaikh and K. Barbé, “Initial estimation of wiener-hammerstein system with random forest,” In Proceedings of the International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference - I2MTC2019, Auckland, New Zealand, May 2019, pp. 1–6.
  9. A. Cichocki, D. Mandic, L. De Lathauwer, G. Zhou, Q. Zhao, C. Caiafa, and H. A. PHAN, “Tensor Decompositions for Signal Processing Applications: From two-way to multiway component analysis,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 145–163, Mar. 2015, conference Name: IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.
  10. N. D. Sidiropoulos, L. De Lathauwer, X. Fu, K. Huang, E. E. Papalexakis, and C. Faloutsos, “Tensor Decomposition for Signal Processing and Machine Learning,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 65, no. 13, pp. 3551–3582, Jul. 2017, arXiv: 1607.01668. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.01668.
  11. N. Kargas and N. D. Sidiropoulos, “Nonlinear System Identification via Tensor Completion,” arXiv:1906.05746 [cs, stat], Dec. 2019, arXiv: 1906.05746. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.05746.
  12. M. Boussé, O. Debals, and L. De Lathauwer, “Tensor-based large-scale blind system identification using segmentation,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 65, no. 21, pp. 5770–5784, December 2017.
  13. G. Favier and A. Y. Kibangou, “Tensor-based methods for system identification,” International Journal on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic control & computer engineering - STA 2008, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 840–869, July 2008.
  14. M. Sørensen and L. De Lathauwer, “Tensor decompositions with block-toeplitz structure and applications in signal processing,” In Proceedings of the 45 th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers - ACSSC 2011, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, November 2011, pp. 454–458.
  15. C. A. Fernandes, G. Favier, and J. C. M. Mota, “Blind identification of multiuser nonlinear channels using tensor decomposition and precoding,” Signal Processing, vol. 89, no. 12, pp. 2644–2656, June 2009.
  16. A. Kibangou and G. Favier, “Blind joint identification and equalization of wiener-hammerstein communication channels using paratuck-2 tensor decomposition,” In Proceedings of the 15th European Signal Processing Conference - EUSIPCO 2007.   Poznan, Poland: IEEE, September 2007, pp. 1516–1520.
  17. E. E. Papalexakis, C. Faloutsos, and N. D. Sidiropoulos, “Parcube: Sparse parallelizable tensor decompositions,” In Proceedings of the Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases - ECML PKDD 2012, Bristol, UK, September 2012, pp. 521–536.
  18. C. Auer, O. Ploder, T. Paireder, P. Kovács, O. Lang, and M. Huemer, “Adaptive system identification via low-rank tensor decomposition,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 139 028–139 042, 2021.
  19. A. Gebhard, “Self-interference cancellation and rejection in fdd rf-transceivers,” Ph.D. dissertation, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 2019.
  20. A. Hjorungnes and D. Gesbert, “Complex-valued matrix differentiation: Techniques and key results,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2740–2746, June 2007.
  21. T. Paireder, C. Motz, and M. Huemer, “Normalized stochastic gradient descent learning of general complex-valued models,” Electronics Letters, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 493–495, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1049/ell2.12170
  22. A. I. Hanna and D. P. Mandic, “A fully adaptive normalized nonlinear gradient descent algorithm for complex-valued nonlinear adaptive filters,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 2540–2549, October 2003.
  23. C. Motz, T. Paireder, and M. Huemer, “Low-complex digital cancellation of transmitter harmonics in lte-a/5g transceivers,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 2, pp. 948–963, 2021.
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Whiteboard

Paper to Video (Beta)

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.