Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 65 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 186 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 439 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 33 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Microlensing bias on the detection of strong lensing gravitational wave (2306.14796v1)

Published 26 Jun 2023 in astro-ph.CO and gr-qc

Abstract: Identifying strong lensing gravitational wave (SLGW) events is of utmost importance in astrophysics as we approach the historic first detection of SLGW amidst the growing number of gravitational wave (GW) events. Currently, one crucial method for identifying SLGW signals involves assessing the overlap of parameters between two GWs. However, the distribution of discrete matter, such as stars and sub-halos, within the strong lensing galaxy can imprint a wave optical (WO) effect on the SLGW waveform. These frequency dependent imprints introduce biases in parameter estimation and impact SLGW identification. In this study, we assess the influence of the stellar microlensing field embedded in a strong lensing galaxy. Our finding demonstrate that the WO effect reduces the detection efficiency of SLGW by $5\%\sim 50\%$ for various false alarm probabilities per pair (${\rm FAP}{\rm per~pair}$). Specifically, at an ${\rm FAP}{\rm per~pair}$ of $10{-5}$, the detection efficiency decreases from $\sim 10\%$ to $\sim 5\%$. Consequently, the presence of the microlensing field can result in missing half of the strong lensing candidates. Additionally, the microlensing WO effect introduces a noticeable bias in intrinsic parameters, particularly for chirp mass and mass ratio. However, it has tiny influence on extrinsic parameters. Considering all parameters, $\sim 30\%$ of events exhibit a $1\sigma$ parameter bias, $\sim 12\%$ exhibit a $2\sigma$ parameter bias, and $\sim 5\%$ exhibit a $3\sigma$ parameter bias.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.