2000 character limit reached
Testing gravity with cosmic variance-limited pulsar timing array correlations
Published 23 Jun 2023 in gr-qc and astro-ph.CO | (2306.13593v4)
Abstract: The nanohertz stochastic gravitational wave background (SGWB) is an excellent early universe laboratory for testing the fundamental properties of gravity. In this letter, we elucidate on the full potential of pulsar timing array (PTA) by utilizing cosmic variance-limited, or rather experimental noise-free, correlation measurements to understand the SGWB and by extension gravity. We show that measurements of the angular power spectrum play a pivotal role in the PTA precision era for scientific inferencing. In particular, we illustrate that cosmic variance-limited measurements of the first few power spectrum multipoles enable us to clearly set apart general relativity from alternative theories of gravity. This ultimately conveys that PTAs can be most ambitious for testing gravity in the nanohertz GW regime by zeroing in on the power spectrum.
- Sarah Burke-Spolaor et al., “The Astrophysics of Nanohertz Gravitational Waves,” Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 27, 5 (2019), arXiv:1811.08826 [astro-ph.HE] .
- Nihan S. Pol et al. (NANOGrav), “Astrophysics Milestones for Pulsar Timing Array Gravitational-wave Detection,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 911, L34 (2021), arXiv:2010.11950 [astro-ph.HE] .
- Steven L. Detweiler, “Pulsar timing measurements and the search for gravitational waves,” Astrophys. J. 234, 1100–1104 (1979).
- R. W. Hellings and G. W. Downs, “Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational radiation background from pulsar timing analysis,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 265, L39–L42 (1983).
- Joseph D. Romano and Neil J. Cornish, “Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment,” Living Rev. Rel. 20, 2 (2017), arXiv:1608.06889 [gr-qc] .
- Zaven Arzoumanian et al. (NANOGrav), “The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 905, L34 (2020), arXiv:2009.04496 [astro-ph.HE] .
- Boris Goncharov et al., “On the Evidence for a Common-spectrum Process in the Search for the Nanohertz Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 917, L19 (2021), arXiv:2107.12112 [astro-ph.HE] .
- S. Chen et al., “Common-red-signal analysis with 24-yr high-precision timing of the European Pulsar Timing Array: inferences in the stochastic gravitational-wave background search,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 508, 4970–4993 (2021), arXiv:2110.13184 [astro-ph.HE] .
- G. Hobbs et al., “The international pulsar timing array project: using pulsars as a gravitational wave detector,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 084013 (2010), arXiv:0911.5206 [astro-ph.SR] .
- Bruce Allen et al., “The International Pulsar Timing Array checklist for the detection of nanohertz gravitational waves,” (2023), arXiv:2304.04767 [astro-ph.IM] .
- Austin Joyce, Bhuvnesh Jain, Justin Khoury, and Mark Trodden, “Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model,” Phys. Rept. 568, 1–98 (2015), arXiv:1407.0059 [astro-ph.CO] .
- Lucas Lombriser and Andy Taylor, ‘‘Breaking a Dark Degeneracy with Gravitational Waves,” JCAP 03, 031 (2016), arXiv:1509.08458 [astro-ph.CO] .
- Jeremy Sakstein and Bhuvnesh Jain, “Implications of the Neutron Star Merger GW170817 for Cosmological Scalar-Tensor Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251303 (2017), arXiv:1710.05893 [astro-ph.CO] .
- Paolo Creminelli and Filippo Vernizzi, “Dark Energy after GW170817 and GRB170817A,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251302 (2017), arXiv:1710.05877 [astro-ph.CO] .
- T. Baker, E. Bellini, P. G. Ferreira, M. Lagos, J. Noller, and I. Sawicki, “Strong constraints on cosmological gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251301 (2017), arXiv:1710.06394 [astro-ph.CO] .
- Jose María Ezquiaga and Miguel Zumalacárregui, “Dark Energy After GW170817: Dead Ends and the Road Ahead,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251304 (2017), arXiv:1710.05901 [astro-ph.CO] .
- Claudia de Rham and Scott Melville, “Gravitational Rainbows: LIGO and Dark Energy at its Cutoff,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 221101 (2018), arXiv:1806.09417 [hep-th] .
- Wenzer Qin, Kimberly K. Boddy, Marc Kamionkowski, and Liang Dai, “Pulsar-timing arrays, astrometry, and gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 063002 (2019), arXiv:1810.02369 [astro-ph.CO] .
- Wenzer Qin, Kimberly K. Boddy, and Marc Kamionkowski, “Subluminal stochastic gravitational waves in pulsar-timing arrays and astrometry,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 024045 (2021), arXiv:2007.11009 [gr-qc] .
- Kin-Wang Ng, “Redshift-space fluctuations in stochastic gravitational wave background,” Phys. Rev. D 106, 043505 (2022), arXiv:2106.12843 [astro-ph.CO] .
- Reginald Christian Bernardo and Kin-Wang Ng, “Stochastic gravitational wave background phenomenology in a pulsar timing array,” Phys. Rev. D 107, 044007 (2023a), arXiv:2208.12538 [gr-qc] .
- Qiuyue Liang, Meng-Xiang Lin, and Mark Trodden, “A Test of Gravity with Pulsar Timing Arrays,” (2023), arXiv:2304.02640 [astro-ph.CO] .
- Bruce Allen, “Variance of the Hellings-Downs correlation,” Phys. Rev. D 107, 043018 (2023), arXiv:2205.05637 [gr-qc] .
- Bruce Allen and Joseph D. Romano, “The Hellings and Downs correlation of an arbitrary set of pulsars,” (2022), arXiv:2208.07230 [gr-qc] .
- Reginald Christian Bernardo and Kin-Wang Ng, “Pulsar and cosmic variances of pulsar timing-array correlation measurements of the stochastic gravitational wave background,” JCAP 11, 046 (2022), arXiv:2209.14834 [gr-qc] .
- Ryotaro Kase and Shinji Tsujikawa, “Dark energy in Horndeski theories after GW170817: A review,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28, 1942005 (2019), arXiv:1809.08735 [gr-qc] .
- Reginald Christian Bernardo and Kin-Wang Ng, “Looking out for the Galileon in the nanohertz gravitational wave sky,” Phys. Lett. B 841, 137939 (2023b), arXiv:2206.01056 [astro-ph.CO] .
- Qiuyue Liang and Mark Trodden, “Detecting the stochastic gravitational wave background from massive gravity with pulsar timing arrays,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 084052 (2021), arXiv:2108.05344 [astro-ph.CO] .
- Reginald Christian Bernardo and Kin-Wang Ng, “Constraining gravitational wave propagation using pulsar timing array correlations,” Phys. Rev. D 107, L101502 (2023c), arXiv:2302.11796 [gr-qc] .
- Yu-Mei Wu, Zu-Cheng Chen, and Qing-Guo Huang, “Search for stochastic gravitational-wave background from massive gravity in the NANOGrav 12.5-year dataset,” Phys. Rev. D 107, 042003 (2023), arXiv:2302.00229 [gr-qc] .
- Zaven Arzoumanian et al. (NANOGrav), “The NANOGrav 12.5-year Data Set: Search for Non-Einsteinian Polarization Modes in the Gravitational-wave Background,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 923, L22 (2021), arXiv:2109.14706 [gr-qc] .
- Sydney J. Chamberlin and Xavier Siemens, “Stochastic backgrounds in alternative theories of gravity: overlap reduction functions for pulsar timing arrays,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 082001 (2012), arXiv:1111.5661 [astro-ph.HE] .
- Gemma Janssen et al., “Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA,” PoS AASKA14, 037 (2015), arXiv:1501.00127 [astro-ph.IM] .
- A. Weltman et al., “Fundamental physics with the Square Kilometre Array,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 37, e002 (2020), arXiv:1810.02680 [astro-ph.CO] .
- Kin-Wang Ng and Guo-Chin Liu, “Correlation functions of CMB anisotropy and polarization,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 8, 61–83 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9710012 .
- Jonathan Nay, Kimberly K. Boddy, Tristan L. Smith, and Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, “Harmonic Analysis for Pulsar Timing Arrays,” (2023), arXiv:2306.06168 [gr-qc] .
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.