Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Atomic clock locking with Bayesian quantum parameter estimation: scheme and experiment

Published 11 Jun 2023 in quant-ph | (2306.06608v4)

Abstract: Atomic clocks are crucial for science and technology, but their sensitivity is often restricted by the standard quantum limit. To surpass this limit, correlations between particles or interrogation times must be leveraged. Although the sensitivity can be enhanced to the Heisenberg limit using quantum entanglement, it remains unclear whether the scaling of sensitivity with total interrogation time can achieve the Heisenberg scaling. Here, we design an adaptive Bayesian quantum frequency estimation protocol that approaches the Heisenberg scaling and experimentally demonstrate its validity with a cold-atom coherent-population-trapping (CPT) clock. In further, we achieve robust and high-precision closed-loop locking of the cold-atom CPT clock by utilizing our Bayesian quantum frequency estimation protocol. In comparison to the conventional proportional-integral-differential locking, our Bayesian locking scheme not only yields an improvement of 5.1(4) dB in fractional frequency stability, but also exhibits better robustness against technical noises. Our findings not only provide a robust and high-precision approach to lock atomic clocks, but also hold promising applications in various interferometry-based quantum sensors, such as quantum magnetometers and atomic interferometers.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (11)
  1. J. Huang, M. Zhuang, and C. Lee, Entanglement-enhanced quantum metrology: from standard quantum limit to Heisenberg limit, arXiv:2402.03572  (2024a).
  2. R. S. Said, D. W. Berry, and J. Twamley, Nanoscale magnetometry using a single-spin system in diamond, Phys. Rev. B 83, 125410 (2011).
  3. N. Wiebe and C. Granade, Efficient Bayesian phase estimation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 010503 (2016).
  4. C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017).
  5. N. M. Nusran, M. U. Momeen, and M. V. Dutt, High-dynamic-range magnetometry with a single electronic spin in diamond, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 109 (2012).
  6. L. Pezzè and A. Smerzi, Heisenberg-limited noisy atomic clock using a hybrid coherent and squeezed state protocol, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 210503 (2020).
  7. P. Cappellaro, Spin-bath narrowing with adaptive parameter estimation, Phys. Rev. A 85, 030301(R) (2012).
  8. W. Nagourney, J. Sandberg, and H. Dehmelt, Shelved optical electron amplifier: Observation of quantum jumps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2797 (1986).
  9. R. Wynands and S. Weyers, Atomic fountain clocks, Metrologia 42, S64 (2005).
  10. S. Nolan, A. Smerzi, and L. Pezzè, A machine learning approach to Bayesian parameter estimation, npj Quantum Information 7, 169 (2021).
  11. J. Borregaard and A. S. Sørensen, Near-Heisenberg-limited atomic clocks in the presence of decoherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 090801 (2013).
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 1 like about this paper.