Semiclassical Theory and the Koopman-van Hove Equation
Abstract: The phase space Koopman-van Hove (KvH) equation can be derived from the asymptotic semiclassical analysis of partial differential equations. Semiclassical theory yields the Hamilton-Jacobi equation for the complex phase factor and the transport equation for the amplitude. These two equations can be combined to form a nonlinear semiclassical version of the KvH equation in configuration space. There is a natural injection of configuration space solutions into phase space and a natural projection of phase space solutions onto configuration space. Hence, every solution of the configuration space KvH equation satisfies both the semiclassical phase space KvH equation and the Hamilton-Jacobi constraint. For configuration space solutions, this constraint resolves the paradox that there are two different conserved densities in phase space. For integrable systems, the KvH spectrum is the Cartesian product of a classical and a semiclassical spectrum. If the classical spectrum is eliminated, then, with the correct choice of Jeffreys-Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (JWKB) matching conditions, the semiclassical spectrum satisfies the Einstein-Brillouin-Keller quantization conditions which include the correction due to the Maslov index. However, semiclassical analysis uses different choices for boundary conditions, continuity requirements, and the domain of definition. For example, use of the complex JWKB method allows for the treatment of tunneling through the complexification of phase space. Finally, although KvH wavefunctions include the possibility of interference effects, interference is not observable when all observables are approximated as local operators on phase space. Observing interference effects requires consideration of nonlocal operations, e.g. through higher orders in the asymptotic theory.
- Bondar DÂ I, Gay-Balmaz F and Tronci C 2019 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 475 20180879 URL https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0879
- Joseph I 2020 Phys. Rev. Research 2 043102 (Preprint arXiv:2003.09980) URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043102
- Tronci C and Joseph I 2021 J. Plasmas Phys. 87 835870402 (Preprint arXiv:2105.00294) URL https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377821000805
- Landau LÂ D and Lifschitz LÂ M 1977 Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory (New York: Butterworth Heineman)
- Maslov VÂ P and Fedoriuk MÂ V 1981 Semi-classical Approximation in Quantum Mechanics (Boston: Reidel)
- Guillemin V and Sternberg S 1990 Geometric asymptotics (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs vol 14) (Boston: American Mathematical Society)
- Littlejohn RÂ G 1992 J. Stat. Phys. 68 7 URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048836
- Bates S and Weinstein A 1997 Lectures on the Geometry of Quantization (Berkeley Mathematics Lecture Notes vol 8) (American Mathematical Society)
- Hall B 2013 Quantum Theory for Mathematicians (Graduate Texts in Mathematics vol 267) (New York: Springer)
- van Hove L 1951 On certain unitary representations of an infinite group of transformations (New Jersey: World Scientific)
- Kostant B 1972 Line bundles and the prequantized Schroedinger equation (Colloquium on group theoretical methods in physics vol IV.1-IV.22) (Marseille: Centre de Physique Théorique)
- Sakurai JÂ J and Napolitano JÂ J 2014 Modern Quantum Mechanics 2nd edn (Harlow) (Pearson)
- Knoll J and Schaeffer R 1976 Ann. Phys., NY 97 307 URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(76)90040-3
- Maslov V P 1994 The complex WKB method for nonlinear equations (Progress in Physics vol 16) (Boston: Springer Basel AG)
- Balian R and Bloch C 1974 Ann. Phys., NY 85 514 URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(74)90421-7
- Voros A 1983 Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique théorique, Tome 39 (1983) 3 211 URL http://www.numdam.org/item/?id=AIHPA_1983__39_3_211_0
- Van Vleck J H 1928 Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 14 178 URL https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.14.2.178
- Reed M and Simon B 1980 Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I: Functional Analysis (New York: Academic Press, Inc.)
- Lanczos C 1970 Variational Principles of Mechanics (New York: University of Toronto Press)
- Goldstein H, Poole CÂ P and Safko JÂ L 2001 Classical Dynamics (New York: Addison-Wesley)
- Lichtenberg AÂ J and Lieberman MÂ A 1992 Regular and Chaotic Dynamics (New York: Springer-Verlag)
- Sudarshan EÂ CÂ G and Mukunda N 1974 Classical Dynamics: A Modern Perspective (New York: Addison-Wesley)
- Morrison PÂ J 1998 Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 467 URL https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.70.467
- Gelfand I M and Shilov V E 1964 Generalized functions vol 4 (New York: Academic Press)
- de la Madrid R 2005 Eur. J. Phys. 26 287 URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/26/2/008
- Egorov YÂ V 1990 Russ. Math. Surv. 45 1 URL https://doi.org/10.1070/RM1990v045n05ABEH002683
- Kramers HÂ A 1926 Z. Phys. 39 828 URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01451751
- Keller JÂ B 1958 Ann. Phys., NY 4 180 URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(58)90032-0
- Grunwald HÂ P and Milano F 1971 Am. J. Phys. 39 1394 URL https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1976668
- Zeh HÂ D 1970 Found. Phys. 1 69 URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708656
- Zurek WÂ H 2003 Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 715 (Preprint arXiv:quant-ph/0105127) URL https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715
- Weyl H 1927 Z. Phys. 46 1 URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055756
- Dirac PÂ AÂ M 1927 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 114 243 URL https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1927.0039
- Schwatrz L 1950 Theorie des distributions (Paris: Hermann)
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper.