2000 character limit reached
Unique Steady-State Squeezing in a Driven Quantum Rabi Model
Published 23 May 2023 in quant-ph | (2305.14290v2)
Abstract: Squeezing is essential to many quantum technologies and our understanding of quantum physics. Here we develop a theory of steady-state squeezing that can be generated in the closed and open quantum Rabi as well as Dicke model. To this end, we eliminate the spin dynamics which effectively leads to an abstract harmonic oscillator whose eigenstates are squeezed with respect to the physical harmonic oscillator. The generated form of squeezing has the unique property of time-independent uncertainties and squeezed dynamics, a novel type of quantum behavior. Such squeezing might find applications in continuous back-action evading measurements and should already be observable in optomechanical systems and Coulomb crystals.
- C. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum noise: a handbook of Markovian and non-Markovian quantum stochastic methods with applications to quantum optics (Springer Science & Business Media, 2004).
- S. Zubairy, Quantum squeezing, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics 7, 156 (2005).
- D. F. Walls, Squeezed states of light, Nature 306, 141 (1983).
- M. Xiao, L.-A. Wu, and H. J. Kimble, Precision measurement beyond the shot-noise limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 278 (1987).
- E. S. Polzik, J. Carri, and H. J. Kimble, Spectroscopy with squeezed light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3020 (1992).
- LIGO Scientific Collaboration, A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit, Nature Physics 7, 962 (2011).
- R. Schnabel, Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers, Physics Reports 684, 1 (2017), squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers.
- LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Quantum-enhanced advanced ligo detectors in the era of gravitational-wave astronomy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231107 (2019).
- Virgo Collaboration, Increasing the astrophysical reach of the advanced virgo detector via the application of squeezed vacuum states of light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231108 (2019).
- LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, Gwtc-2: Compact binary coalescences observed by ligo and virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021).
- P. Wang, X. Wang, and Y. Li, Continuous-variable measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using modulated squeezed states and optical amplifiers, Phys. Rev. A 99, 042309 (2019).
- I. Derkach, V. C. Usenko, and R. Filip, Squeezing-enhanced quantum key distribution over atmospheric channels, New Journal of Physics 22, 053006 (2020).
- N. Hosseinidehaj, M. S. Winnel, and T. C. Ralph, Simple and loss-tolerant free-space quantum key distribution using a squeezed laser, Phys. Rev. A 105, 032602 (2022).
- M.-J. Hwang, R. Puebla, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum phase transition and universal dynamics in the rabi model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180404 (2015).
- B. W. Shore and P. L. Knight, The jaynes-cummings model, Journal of Modern Optics 40, 1195 (1993).
- J. Larson and T. Mavrogordatos, The Jaynes–Cummings Model and Its Descendants, 2053-2563 (IOP Publishing, 2021).
- M.-J. Hwang and M. B. Plenio, Quantum phase transition in the finite jaynes-cummings lattice systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 123602 (2016).
- S. Bravyi, D. P. DiVincenzo, and D. Loss, Schrieffer–wolff transformation for quantum many-body systems, Annals of Physics 326, 2793 (2011).
- K. Gietka, Harnessing center-of-mass excitations in quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043074 (2022a).
- https://journals.aps.org/prl/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.223604/Supplemental_Material.pdf (a).
- K. Gietka, Squeezing by critical speeding up: Applications in quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. A 105, 042620 (2022b).
- M. Brunelli, D. Malz, and A. Nunnenkamp, Conditional dynamics of optomechanical two-tone backaction-evading measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 093602 (2019).
- K. Gietka and T. Busch, Inverted harmonic oscillator dynamics of the nonequilibrium phase transition in the dicke model, Phys. Rev. E 104, 034132 (2021).
- T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. 58, 1098 (1940).
- D. Plankensteiner, C. Hotter, and H. Ritsch, QuantumCumulants.jl: A Julia framework for generalized mean-field equations in open quantum systems, Quantum 6 (2022).
- https://qojulia.github.io/QuantumCumulants.jl/stable/examples/unique_squeezing/ (b).
- F. Beaudoin, J. M. Gambetta, and A. Blais, Dissipation and ultrastrong coupling in circuit qed, Phys. Rev. A 84, 043832 (2011).
- M.-J. Hwang, P. Rabl, and M. B. Plenio, Dissipative phase transition in the open quantum rabi model, Phys. Rev. A 97, 013825 (2018).
- R. C. Thompson, Ion coulomb crystals, Contemp. Phys. 56, 63 (2015).
- V. P. Pavlov, D. Porras, and P. A. Ivanov, Quantum metrology with critical driven-dissipative collective spin system (2023), arXiv:2302.05216 [quant-ph] .
- S. S. Mirkhalaf, E. Witkowska, and L. Lepori, Supersensitive quantum sensor based on criticality in an antiferromagnetic spinor condensate, Phys. Rev. A 101, 043609 (2020).
- K. Gietka, L. Ruks, and T. Busch, Understanding and Improving Critical Metrology. Quenching Superradiant Light-Matter Systems Beyond the Critical Point, Quantum 6, 700 (2022).
- K. Gietka and H. Ritsch, Squeezing and overcoming the heisenberg scaling with spin-orbit coupled quantum gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 090802 (2023).
- A. Kronwald, F. Marquardt, and A. A. Clerk, Arbitrarily large steady-state bosonic squeezing via dissipation, Phys. Rev. A 88, 063833 (2013).
- M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper.