Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Patterns in the jump-channel statistics of open quantum systems

Published 13 May 2023 in quant-ph and cond-mat.stat-mech | (2305.07957v2)

Abstract: A continuously measured quantum system with multiple jump channels gives rise to a stochastic process described by random jump times and random emitted symbols, representing each jump channel. While much is known about the waiting time distributions, very little is known about the statistics of the emitted symbols. In this letter we fill in this gap. First, we provide a full characterization of the resulting stochastic process, including efficient ways of simulating it, as well as determining the underlying memory structure. Second, we show how to unveil patterns in the stochastic evolution: Some systems support closed patterns, wherein the evolution runs over a finite set of states, or at least recurring states. But even if neither is possible, we show that one may still cluster the states approximately, based on their ability to predict future outcomes. We illustrate these ideas by studying transport through a boundary-driven one-dimensional XY spin chain.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (41)
  1. H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Quantum measurement and control (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2009).
  2. K. Jacobs, Quantum measurement theory and its applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014).
  3. G. T. Landi, M. J. Kewming, M. T. Mitchison,  and P. P. Potts, “Current fluctuations in open quantum systems: Bridging the gap between quantum continuous measurements and full counting statistics,”  (2023), arXiv:2303.04270 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph].
  4. R. J. Cook and H. J. Kimble, Physical Review Letters 54, 1023 (1985).
  5. M. B. Plenio and P. L. Knight, Reviews of Modern Physics 70, 101 (1998), arXiv: quant-ph/9702007 ISBN: 0034-6861.
  6. H. Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics, 3rd ed. (Springer, 2014).
  7. T. Brandes, Annalen der Physik (Leipzig) 17, 477 (2008), arXiv: 0802.2233.
  8. T. Brandes and C. Emary, Physical Review E 93, 042103 (2016), arXiv: 1602.02975.
  9. D. S. Kosov, “Distribution of waiting times between superoperator quantum jumps in Lindblad dynamics,”  (2016), arXiv:1605.02170 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph].
  10. K. Ptaszyński, Physical Review B 96, 035409 (2017), arXiv: 1707.00441v1.
  11. R. Vyas and S. Singh, Physical Review A 38, 2423 (1988).
  12. K. H. Thomas and C. Flindt, Physical Review B 87, 121405 (2013), arXiv: 1211.4995v1.
  13. K. H. Thomas and C. Flindt, Physical Review B 89, 245420 (2014), arXiv: 1402.5033.
  14. S. Milz and K. Modi, PRX Quantum 2, 030201 (2021), arXiv: 2012.01894.
  15. T. Prosen and I. Pižorn, Physical Review Letters 101, 105701 (2008), arXiv: 0805.2878.
  16. D. Karevski and T. Platini, Physical Review Letters 102, 207207 (2009), arXiv: 0904.3527.
  17. T. Prosen and B. Zunkovic, New Journal of Physics 12, 025016 (2010), arXiv: 0910.0195.
  18. A. A. Dzhioev and D. S. Kosov, Journal of Chemical Physics 134, 1 (2011), arXiv: 1007.4643v2.
  19. C. Guo and D. Poletti, Physical Review A 95, 052107 (2017).
  20. G. T. Landi and D. Karevski, Physical Review B 91, 174422 (2015).
  21. J. Thingna and J.-S. Wang, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 104, 37006 (2013).
  22. J. J. Mendoza-Arenas and S. R. Clark, “Giant rectification in strongly-interacting boundary-driven tilted systems,”  (2022), arXiv:2209.11718 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph].
  23. V. K. Varma and M. Žnidarič, Physical Review B 100, 085105 (2019), publisher: American Physical Society.
  24. G. Schaller, Open Quantum Systems Far from Equilibrium (2014).
  25. L. Levitov and G. Lesovik, JETP letters 58, 230 (1993).
  26. Y. V. Nazarov and M. Kindermann, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 35, 413 (2003).
  27. M. Radaelli, G. T. Landi,  and F. C. Binder, “A Gillespie algorithm for efficient simulation of quantum jump trajectories,”  (2023), arXiv:2303.15405 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph].
  28. F. Carollo and V. Alba, Physical Review B 106, L220304 (2022).
  29. J. P. Crutchfield and K. Young, Physical Review Letters 63, 105 (1989).
  30. C. R. Shalizi and J. P. Crutchfield, Journal of Statistical Physics 104, 817 (2001).
  31. C. R. Shalizi and K. L. Shalizi,   (2004), arXiv: cs/0406011.
  32. J. P. Crutchfield, Nature Physics 8, 17 (2012), number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  33. See supplemental material.
  34. R. Renner and U. Maurer, IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory , 364 (2002), iSBN: 0-7803-7501-7.
  35. T. M. Cover and T. A. J, Elements of Information Theory (Wiley, New York, 1991).
  36. A. M. Jurgens and J. P. Crutchfield, Journal of Statistical Physics 183, 32 (2021).
  37. N. F. Travers and J. P. Crutchfield, “Equivalence of History and Generator Epsilon-Machines,”  (2012), arXiv:1111.4500 [cond-mat, physics:nlin, stat].
  38. N. G. van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry (North-Holland Personal Library, 2007).
  39. H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, USA, 2007).
  40. E. B. Davies, Communications in Mathematical Physics 39, 91 (1974).
  41. W. Feller, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 67.1, 98 (1949).
Citations (3)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.