Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 62 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 67 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 430 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Halo mass-observable proxy scaling relations and their dependencies on galaxy and group properties (2305.06803v2)

Published 11 May 2023 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: Based on the DECaLS shear catalog, we study the scaling relations between halo mass($M_{\rm h}$) and various proxies for SDSS central galaxies, including stellar mass($M_$), stellar velocity dispersion($\sigma_$), abundance matching halo mass($M_{\rm AM}$) and satellite velocity dispersion($\sigma_{\rm s}$), and their dependencies on galaxy and group properties. In general, these proxies all have strong positive correlations with $M_{\rm h}$, consistent with previous studies. We find that the $M_{\rm h}$-$M_$ and $M_{\rm h}$-$\sigma_$ relations depend strongly on group richness($N_{\rm sat}$), while the $M_{\rm h}$-$M_{\rm AM}$ and $M_{\rm h}$-$\sigma_{\rm s}$ relations are independent of it. Moreover, the dependence on star formation rate(SFR) is rather weak in the $M_{\rm h}$-$\sigma_$ and $M_{\rm h}$-$\sigma_{\rm s}$ relations, but very prominent in the other two. $\sigma_{\rm s}$ is thus the best proxy among them, and its scaling relation is in good agreement with hydro-dynamical simulations. However, estimating $\sigma_{\rm s}$ accurately for individual groups/clusters is challenging because of interlopers and the requirement for sufficient satellites. We construct new proxies by combining $M_$, $\sigma_$, and $M_{\rm AM}$, and find the proxy with 30\% contribution from $M_{\rm AM}$ and 70\% from $\sigma_$ can minimize the dependence on $N_{\rm sat}$ and SFR. We obtain the $M_{\rm h}$-supermassive black hole(SMBH) mass relation via the SMBH scaling relation and find indications for rapid and linear growth phases for SMBH. We also find that correlations among $M_{\rm h}$, $M_$ and $\sigma_$ change with $M_*$, indicating that different processes drive the growth of galaxies and SMBH at different stages.

Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.