Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Microgravity induces overconfidence in perceptual decision-making

Published 24 Apr 2023 in cs.RO and cs.HC | (2304.12133v3)

Abstract: Does gravity affect decision-making? This question comes into sharp focus as plans for interplanetary human space missions solidify. In the framework of Bayesian brain theories, gravity encapsulates a strong prior, anchoring agents to a reference frame via the vestibular system, informing their decisions and possibly their integration of uncertainty. What happens when such a strong prior is altered? We address this question using a self-motion estimation task in a space analog environment under conditions of altered gravity. Two participants were cast as remote drone operators orbiting Mars in a virtual reality environment on board a parabolic flight, where both hyper- and microgravity conditions were induced. From a first-person perspective, participants viewed a drone exiting a cave and had to first predict a collision and then provide a confidence estimate of their response. We evoked uncertainty in the task by manipulating the motion's trajectory angle. Post-decision subjective confidence reports were negatively predicted by stimulus uncertainty, as expected. Uncertainty alone did not impact overt behavioral responses (performance, choice) differentially across gravity conditions. However microgravity predicted higher subjective confidence, especially in interaction with stimulus uncertainty. These results suggest that variables relating to uncertainty affect decision-making distinctly in microgravity, highlighting the possible need for automatized, compensatory mechanisms when considering human factors in space research.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (89)
  1. G. Schroeder, “NASA’s Ingenuity Mars Helicopter: The first attempt at powered flight on another world.” American Scientist, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 330–331, Nov. 2020, publisher: Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society.
  2. A. Witze, “Lift off! First flight on Mars launches new way to explore worlds,” Nature, vol. 592, no. 7856, pp. 668–669, Apr. 2021, bandiera_abtest: a Cg_type: News Number: 7856 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Subject_term: Planetary science, Atmospheric science.
  3. F. A. Oluwafemi, R. Abdelbaki, J. C. Y. Lai, J. G. Mora-Almanza, and E. M. Afolayan, “A review of astronaut mental health in manned missions: Potential interventions for cognitive and mental health challenges,” Life Sciences in Space Research, vol. 28, pp. 26–31, Feb. 2021.
  4. S. T. Moore, V. Dilda, T. R. Morris, D. A. Yungher, H. G. MacDougall, and S. J. Wood, “Long-duration spaceflight adversely affects post-landing operator proficiency,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2677, Feb. 2019, number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  5. F. Pagnini, D. Manzey, E. Rosnet, D. Ferravante, O. White, and N. Smith, “Human behavior and performance in deep space exploration: next challenges and research gaps,” npj Microgravity, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 27, 2023.
  6. L. Loued-Khenissi and K. Preuschoff, “Information Theoretic Characterization of Uncertainty Distinguishes Surprise From Accuracy Signals in the Brain,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, 2020.
  7. L. Loued-Khenissi, S. Martin-Brevet, L. Schumacher, and C. Corradi-Dell’Acqua, “The effect of uncertainty on pain decisions for self and others,” European Journal of Pain, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1163–1175, 2022.
  8. D. M. Merfeld, L. Zupan, and R. J. Peterka, “Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration,” Nature, vol. 398, no. 6728, pp. 615–618, Apr. 1999, number: 6728 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  9. B. Jörges and J. López-Moliner, “Gravity as a Strong Prior: Implications for Perception and Action,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 11, 2017.
  10. L. Grabherr and F. W. Mast, “Effects of microgravity on cognition : The case of mental imagery,” vol. 20, pp. 53–60, 2010.
  11. C. Pfeiffer, A. Serino, and O. Blanke, “The vestibular system: a spatial reference for bodily self-consciousness,” Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, vol. 8, 2014.
  12. M. W. Spratling, “A review of predictive coding algorithms,” Brain and Cognition, vol. 112, pp. 92–97, Mar. 2017.
  13. L. Loued-Khenissi, A. Pfeuffer, W. Einhäuser, and K. Preuschoff, “Anterior insula reflects surprise in value-based decision-making and perception,” NeuroImage, vol. 210, p. 116549, Apr. 2020.
  14. V. A. Weilnhammer, H. Stuke, P. Sterzer, and K. Schmack, “The Neural Correlates of Hierarchical Predictions for Perceptual Decisions,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 38, no. 21, pp. 5008–5021, May 2018, publisher: Society for Neuroscience Section: Research Articles.
  15. R. P. N. Rao and D. H. Ballard, “Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 79–87, Jan. 1999, number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  16. S. M. Fleming, R. J. Dolan, and C. D. Frith, “Metacognition: computation, biology and function,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 367, no. 1594, pp. 1280–1286, May 2012, publisher: Royal Society.
  17. M. Pereira, P. Megevand, M. X. Tan, W. Chang, S. Wang, A. Rezai, M. Seeck, M. Corniola, S. Momjian, F. Bernasconi, O. Blanke, and N. Faivre, “Evidence accumulation relates to perceptual consciousness and monitoring,” Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 3261, May 2021, number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  18. N. A. A. Atiya, Q. J. M. Huys, R. J. Dolan, and S. M. Fleming, “Explaining distortions in metacognition with an attractor network model of decision uncertainty,” PLOS Computational Biology, vol. 17, no. 7, p. e1009201, Jul. 2021, publisher: Public Library of Science.
  19. M. Barnett-Cowan, M. O. Ernst, and H. H. Bülthoff, “Gravity-dependent change in the ”light-from-above” prior,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 15131, Oct. 2018, number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  20. I. Arshad and E. R. Ferrè, “Cognition in zero gravity: Effects of non-terrestrial gravity on human behaviour,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, p. 17470218221113935, Jul. 2022, publisher: SAGE Publications.
  21. E. R. Ferrè and P. Haggard, “Vestibular cognition: State-of-the-art and future directions,” Cognitive Neuropsychology, vol. 37, no. 7-8, pp. 413–420, Nov. 2020.
  22. S. Deneve and A. Pouget, “Bayesian multisensory integration and cross-modal spatial links,” Journal of Physiology-Paris, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 249–258, Jan. 2004.
  23. J.-P. Noel and D. E. Angelaki, “Cognitive, Systems, and Computational Neurosciences of the Self in Motion,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 103–129, 2022.
  24. C. M. Oman, I. P. Howard, T. Smith, A. C. Beall, A. Natapoff, J. E. Zacher, and H. L. Jenkin, “The Role of Visual Cues in Microgravity Spatial Orientation,” Jan. 2003, nTRS Author Affiliations: Massachusetts Inst. of Tech., York Univ. NTRS Document ID: 20030068201 NTRS Research Center: Johnson Space Center (JSC).
  25. B. S. K. Cheung, I. P. Howard, and K. E. Money, “Visually-induced tilt during parabolic flights,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 391–397, Jul. 1990.
  26. L. Loued-Khenissi and K. Preuschoff, “A Bird’s eye view from below: Activity in the temporo-parietal junction predicts from-above Necker Cube percepts,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 149, p. 107654, Dec. 2020.
  27. F. Lacquaniti, G. Bosco, S. Gravano, I. Indovina, B. La Scaleia, V. Maffei, and M. Zago, “Multisensory integration and internal models for sensing gravity effects in primates,” BioMed research international, vol. 2014, 2014.
  28. J. Bernard-Espina, D. Dal Canto, M. Beraneck, J. McIntyre, and M. Tagliabue, “How Tilting the Head Interferes With Eye-Hand Coordination: The Role of Gravity in Visuo-Proprioceptive, Cross-Modal Sensory Transformations,” Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, vol. 16, p. 788905, 2022.
  29. T. K. Clark, “Effects of Spaceflight on the Vestibular System,” in Handbook of Space Pharmaceuticals, Y. V. Pathak, M. Araújo dos Santos, and L. Zea, Eds.   Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 273–311.
  30. A. Van Ombergen, A. Demertzi, E. Tomilovskaya, B. Jeurissen, J. Sijbers, I. B. Kozlovskaya, P. M. Parizel, P. H. Van de Heyning, S. Sunaert, S. Laureys, and F. L. Wuyts, “The effect of spaceflight and microgravity on the human brain,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 264, no. S1, pp. 18–22, Oct. 2017.
  31. N. Mammarella, “The Effect of Microgravity-Like Conditions on High-Level Cognition: A Review,” Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, vol. 7, 2020.
  32. G. Clèment, C. Lathan, A. Lockerd, and A. Bukley, “Mental representation of spatial cues in microgravity: Writing and drawing tests,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 64, no. 7-8, pp. 678–681, Apr. 2009.
  33. G. Clèment, A. Bukley, N. Loureiro, L. Lindblad, D. Sousa, and A. Zandvilet, “Horizontal and Vertical Distance Perception in Altered Gravity,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 5471, Dec. 2020.
  34. T. Morfoisse, A. G. Herrera, A. Leonardo, G. Clèment, M. Beraneck, J. McIntyre, and M. Tagliabue, “Does gravity shape internal representations of space for human 3D perception?” Nov. 2020.
  35. L. R. Harris, M. Jenkin, H. Jenkin, J. E. Zacher, and R. T. Dyde, “The effect of long-term exposure to microgravity on the perception of upright,” npj Microgravity, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 3, Dec. 2017.
  36. D. Manzey and B. Lorenz, “Mental performance during short-term and long-term spaceflight,” pp. 215–221, 1998.
  37. A. Torok, M. Gallagher, C. Lasbareilles, and E. R. Ferrè, “Getting ready for Mars: How the brain perceives new simulated gravitational environments,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 2342–2349, Sep. 2019, publisher: SAGE Publications.
  38. M. Gallagher, A. Torok, J. Klaas, and E. R. Ferrè, “Gravity prior in human behaviour: a perceptual or semantic phenomenon?” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 238, no. 9, pp. 1957–1962, Sep. 2020.
  39. M. F. Reschke and G. Clèment, “Vestibular and Sensorimotor Dysfunction During Space Flight,” Current Pathobiology Reports, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 177–183, Sep. 2018.
  40. A. H. Saradjian, D. Paleressompoulle, D. Louber, T. Coyle, J. Blouin, and L. Mouchnino, “Do Gravity-Related Sensory Information Enable the Enhancement of Cortical Proprioceptive Inputs When Planning a Step in Microgravity?” PLOS ONE, vol. 9, no. 9, p. e108636, Sep. 2014, publisher: Public Library of Science.
  41. N. Meirhaeghe, V. Bayet, P.-V. Paubel, and C. Mèlan, “Selective facilitation of egocentric mental transformations under short-term microgravity,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 170, pp. 375–385, May 2020.
  42. C. Pfeiffer, J.-P. Noel, A. Serino, and O. Blanke, “Vestibular modulation of peripersonal space boundaries,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 47, 2018.
  43. C. Pfeiffer, P. Grivaz, B. Herbelin, A. Serino, and O. Blanke, “Visual gravity contributes to subjective first-person perspective,” Neuroscience of Consciousness, vol. 2016, 2016.
  44. C. Pfeiffer, C. Lopez, V. Schmutz, J. Duenas, R. Martuzzi, and O. Blanke, “Multisensory origin of the subjective first-person perspective: Visual, tactile, and vestibular mechanisms,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, 2013.
  45. P. Wollseiffen, T. Vogt, V. Abeln, H. K. Straeder, C. D. Askew, and S. Schneider, “Physiology & Behavior Neuro-cognitive performance is enhanced during short periods of microgravity,” Physiology & Behavior, vol. 155, pp. 9–16, 2016.
  46. K. E. Hupfeld, H. R. McGregor, P. A. Reuter-Lorenz, and R. D. Seidler, “Microgravity effects on the human brain and behavior: Dysfunction and adaptive plasticity,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 122, pp. 176–189, Mar. 2021.
  47. I. Indovina, V. Maffei, and F. Lacquaniti, “Anticipating the effects of visual gravity during simulated self-motion: estimates of time-to-passage along vertical and horizontal paths,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 229, no. 4, pp. 579–586, Sep. 2013.
  48. G. De Maio, G. Bottini, and E. R. Ferrè, “Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation influences risk-taking behaviour,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 160, p. 107965, Sep. 2021.
  49. M. Gallagher, I. Arshad, and E. R. Ferrè, “Gravity modulates behaviour control strategy,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 237, no. 4, pp. 989–994, Apr. 2019.
  50. G. Clèment and M. Demel, “Perceptual reversal of bi-stable figures in microgravity and hypergravity during parabolic flight,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 507, no. 2, pp. 143–146, Jan. 2012.
  51. G. Clèment, H. C. M. Allaway, M. Demel, A. Golemis, A. N. Kindrat, A. N. Melinyshyn, T. Merali, and R. Thirsk, “Long-Duration Spaceflight Increases Depth Ambiguity of Reversible Perspective Figures,” PLOS ONE, vol. 10, no. 7, p. e0132317, Jul. 2015, publisher: Public Library of Science.
  52. A. Loquercio, E. Kaufmann, R. Ranftl, M. Müller, V. Koltun, and D. Scaramuzza, “Learning high-speed flight in the wild,” Science Robotics, vol. 6, 2021.
  53. X. Zhou, X. Wen, Z. Wang, Y. Gao, H. Li, Q. Wang, T. Yang, H. Lu, Y. Cao, C. Xu, and F. Gao, “Swarm of micro flying robots in the wild,” Science Robotics, vol. 7, 2022.
  54. S. Udupa, V. R. Kamat, and C. C. Menassa, “Shared autonomy in assistive mobile robots: a review.” Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, pp. 1–22, 2021.
  55. A. Barin, I. Dolgov, and P. O. T. Dugas, “Understanding dangerous play: A grounded theory analysis of high-performance drone racing crashes,” Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 2017.
  56. R. Pěnička and D. Scaramuzza, “Minimum-time quadrotor waypoint flight in cluttered environments,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. PP, pp. 1–1, 2022.
  57. B. G. Kanki, “Cognitive functions and human error,” in Space Safety and Human Performance.   Elsevier, 2018, pp. 17–52.
  58. D. L. Francis and G. Tsekouras, “Apollo 13-crisis, innovation and sensemaking,” in XXXI ISPIM Innovation Conference: Innovating in times of Crisis, 2020.
  59. C. E. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication,” ACM SIGMOBILE mobile computing and communications review, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3–55, 2001.
  60. R. C. Oldfield, “The assessment and analysis of handedness: the edinburgh inventory,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 97–113, Mar. 1971.
  61. S. G. Hart, “NASA task load index (TLX),” Tech. Rep. 20000021487, Jan. 1986.
  62. ——, “Nasa-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later,” Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet., vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 904–908, Oct. 2006.
  63. Y. Okamoto, “An experimental analysis of psychometric functions in a threshold discrimination task with four response categories1,” Jpn. Psychol. Res., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 368–377, Nov. 2012.
  64. K. Friston, “Does predictive coding have a future?” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1019–1021, Aug. 2018, number: 8 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  65. S. Delle Monache, I. Indovina, M. Zago, E. Daprati, F. Lacquaniti, and G. Bosco, “Watching the Effects of Gravity. Vestibular Cortex and the Neural Representation of ”Visual” Gravity,” Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, vol. 15, 2021.
  66. B. R. K. Shevlin, S. M. Smith, J. Hausfeld, and I. Krajbich, “High-value decisions are fast and accurate, inconsistent with diminishing value sensitivity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119, no. 6, p. e2101508119, Feb. 2022, publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
  67. K. Tanaka, N. Nishimura, and Y. Kawai, “Adaptation to microgravity, deconditioning, and countermeasures,” The Journal of Physiological Sciences, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 271–281, Mar. 2017, number: 2 Publisher: BioMed Central.
  68. J. Carriot, I. Mackrous, and K. E. Cullen, “Challenges to the Vestibular System in Space: How the Brain Responds and Adapts to Microgravity,” Frontiers in Neural Circuits, vol. 15, 2021.
  69. B. Scaleia, F. Lacquaniti, and M. Zago, “Body orientation contributes to modelling the effects of gravity for target interception in humans,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 597, no. 7, pp. 2021–2043, Apr. 2019.
  70. C. Bonnet and J. F. Ars, “Reaction times as a measure of uncertainty.”
  71. C. F. Tagliabue, D. Veniero, C. S. Y. Benwell, R. Cecere, S. Savazzi, and G. Thut, “The EEG signature of sensory evidence accumulation during decision formation closely tracks subjective perceptual experience,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 4949, Mar. 2019.
  72. R. M. Reinhart and G. F. Woodman, “High Stakes Trigger the Use of Multiple Memories to Enhance the Control of Attention,” Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY), vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 2022–2035, Aug. 2014.
  73. A. Hintze, R. S. Olson, C. Adami, and R. Hertwig, “Risk sensitivity as an evolutionary adaptation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 8242, Feb. 2015, number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  74. D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk,” in Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I.   World Scientific, 2013, pp. 99–127.
  75. P. Grimaldi, H. Lau, and M. A. Basso, “There are things that we know that we know, and there are things that we do not know we do not know: Confidence in decision-making,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 55, pp. 88–97, Aug. 2015.
  76. R. Frömer, M. R. Nassar, R. Bruckner, B. Stürmer, W. Sommer, and N. Yeung, “Response-based outcome predictions and confidence regulate feedback processing and learning,” eLife, vol. 10, p. e62825, Apr. 2021, publisher: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd.
  77. S. M. Locke, P. Mamassian, and M. S. Landy, “Performance monitoring for sensorimotor confidence: A visuomotor tracking study,” Cognition, vol. 205, p. 104396, Dec. 2020.
  78. T. O. Nelson, J. Dunlosky, D. M. White, J. Steinberg, B. D. Townes, and D. Anderson, “Cognition and metacognition at extreme altitudes on Mount Everest,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 119, pp. 367–374, 1990, place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
  79. L. M. Frye and A. J. Wearing, “What Were They Thinking? A Model of Metacognition for Bushfire Fighters,” in Human Factors Challenges in Emergency Management.   CRC Press, 2014, num Pages: 22.
  80. D. C. Kayes and J. Yoon, “Cognitive Offloading Strategies and Decrements in Learning: Lessons from Aviation and Aerospace Crises,” Journal of Human Performance in Extreme Environments, vol. 17, no. 1, Jan. 2022.
  81. C. D. Wickens, J. W. Keller, and C. Shaw, “Human Factors in High-Altitude Mountaineering,” Journal of Human Performance in Extreme Environments, vol. 12, no. 1, May 2015.
  82. L. G. Militello, C. E. Sushereba, M. Branlat, R. Bean, and V. Finomore, “Designing for military pararescue: Naturalistic decision-making perspective, methods, and frameworks,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 251–272, 2015.
  83. J. Orasanu, “Crew Collaboration in Space: A Naturalistic Decision-Making Perspective,” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. B154–B163, Jun. 2005.
  84. S. J. Gerathewohl, “Personal Experiences during Short Periods of Weightlessness Reported by Sixteen Subjects,” Jun. 1956, accepted: 2017-09-19T20:32:04Z Publisher: Astronautica Acta.
  85. P. Molenberghs, F.-M. Trautwein, A. Böckler, T. Singer, and P. Kanske, “Neural correlates of metacognitive ability and of feeling confident: a large-scale fMRI study,” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1942–1951, Dec. 2016.
  86. N. Goswami, O. White, A. Blaber, J. Evans, J. J. W. A. van Loon, and G. Clement, “Human physiology adaptation to altered gravity environments,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 189, pp. 216–221, Dec. 2021.
  87. A. Tajadura-Jiménez, O. Deroy, T. Marquardt, N. Bianchi-Berthouze, T. Asai, T. Kimura, and N. Kitagawa, “Audio-tactile cues from an object’s fall change estimates of one’s body height,” Plos one, vol. 13, no. 6, p. e0199354, 2018.
  88. R. J. Ploutz-Snyder, J. Fiedler, and A. H. Feiveson, “Justifying small-n research in scientifically amazing settings: challenging the notion that only “big-n” studies are worthwhile,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 116, no. 9, pp. 1251–1252, 2014.
  89. F. Pagnini, D. Barbiani, C. Cavalera, E. Volpato, F. Grosso, G. A. Minazzi, F. Vailati Riboni, F. Graziano, S. Di Tella, G. M. Manzoni et al., “Placebo and nocebo effects as bayesian-brain phenomena: The overlooked role of likelihood and attention,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, p. 17456916221141383, 2023.
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.