Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Modal-graph 3D shape servoing of deformable objects with raw point clouds

Published 18 Apr 2023 in cs.RO | (2304.08822v3)

Abstract: Deformable object manipulation (DOM) with point clouds has great potential as non-rigid 3D shapes can be measured without detecting and tracking image features. However, robotic shape control of deformable objects with point clouds is challenging due to: the unknown point-wise correspondences and the noisy partial observability of raw point clouds; the modeling difficulties of the relationship between point clouds and robot motions. To tackle these challenges, this paper introduces a novel modal-graph framework for the model-free shape servoing of deformable objects with raw point clouds. Unlike the existing works studying the object's geometry structure, our method builds a low-frequency deformation structure for the DOM system, which is robust to the measurement irregularities. The built modal representation and graph structure enable us to directly extract low-dimensional deformation features from raw point clouds. Such extraction requires no extra point processing of registrations, refinements, and occlusion removal. Moreover, to shape the object using the extracted features, we design an adaptive robust controller which is proved to be input-to-state stable (ISS) without offline learning or identifying both the physical and geometric object models. Extensive simulations and experiments are conducted to validate the effectiveness of our method for linear, planar, tubular, and solid objects under different settings.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (64)
  1. In: International conference on machine learning. PMLR, pp. 40–49.
  2. In: MMVR 15-Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, volume 125. IOP Press, pp. 13–18.
  3. An SS, Kim T and James DL (2008) Optimizing cubature for efficient integration of subspace deformations. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 27(5): 1–10.
  4. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, pp. 7542–7549.
  5. Atluri S and Zhu T (2000) New concepts in meshless methods. International journal for numerical methods in engineering 47(1-3): 537–556.
  6. Barbič J and James DL (2005) Real-time subspace integration for st. venant-kirchhoff deformable models. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 24(3): 982–990.
  7. Barr AH (1987) Global and local deformations of solid primitives. In: Readings in Computer Vision. Elsevier, pp. 661–670.
  8. Belytschko T, Lu YY and Gu L (1994) Element-free galerkin methods. International journal for numerical methods in engineering 37(2): 229–256.
  9. Berenson D (2013) Manipulation of deformable objects without modeling and simulating deformation. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, pp. 4525–4532.
  10. Bookstein FL (1989) Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 11(6): 567–585.
  11. Botsch M and Sorkine O (2007) On linear variational surface deformation methods. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 14(1): 213–230.
  12. Choi MG and Ko HS (2005) Modal warping: Real-time simulation of large rotational deformation and manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 11(1): 91–101.
  13. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 22(3): 414–423.
  14. El Ouatouati A and Johnson D (1999) A new approach for numerical modal analysis using the element-free method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 46(1): 1–27.
  15. Fayad J, Agapito L and Del Bue A (2010) Piecewise quadratic reconstruction of non-rigid surfaces from monocular sequences. In: European conference on computer vision. Springer, pp. 297–310.
  16. In: Computer graphics forum, volume 38. Wiley Online Library, pp. 379–391.
  17. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 4(4): 4255–4261.
  18. Hu Z, Sun P and Pan J (2018) Three-dimensional deformable object manipulation using fast online gaussian process regression. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3(2): 979–986.
  19. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part VIII 14. Springer, pp. 362–379.
  20. Jin S, Wang C and Tomizuka M (2019) Robust deformation model approximation for robotic cable manipulation. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, pp. 6586–6593.
  21. Kelemen CB and Gerig G (1996) Segmentation of 2-d and 3-d objects from mri volume data using constrained elastic deformations of flexible fourier contour and surface models. Medical image analysis 1(1): 19–34.
  22. Lagneau R, Krupa A and Marchal M (2020a) Active deformation through visual servoing of soft objects. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 8978–8984.
  23. Lagneau R, Krupa A and Marchal M (2020b) Automatic shape control of deformable wires based on model-free visual servoing. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5(4): 5252–5259.
  24. Li X, Su X and Liu YH (2018) Vision-based robotic manipulation of flexible pcbs. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 23(6): 2739–2749.
  25. In: Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, pp. 256–266.
  26. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, pp. 5619–5626.
  27. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 34. pp. 11596–11603.
  28. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 32(6): 1–7.
  29. Ma W, Zhu J and Navarro-Alarcon D (2022) Shape control of elastic objects based on implicit sensorimotor models and data-driven geometric features. In: International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems. Springer, pp. 518–531.
  30. The International Journal of Robotics Research 39(8): 957–982.
  31. Navarro-Alarcon D and Liu YH (2018) Fourier-based shape servoing: a new feedback method to actively deform soft objects into desired 2-d image contours. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 34(1): 272–279.
  32. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 32(2): 429–441.
  33. In: Computer graphics forum, volume 25. Wiley Online Library, pp. 809–836.
  34. Mathematics and computers in simulation 79(3): 763–813.
  35. Paschalidou D, Ulusoy AO and Geiger A (2019) Superquadrics revisited: Learning 3d shape parsing beyond cuboids. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 10344–10353.
  36. Pentland A and Sclaroff S (1991) Closed-form solutions for physically based shape modeling and recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence (7): 715–729.
  37. Pentland A and Williams J (1989) Good vibrations: Modal dynamics for graphics and animation. In: Proceedings of the 16th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. pp. 215–222.
  38. Pentland AP (1987) Perceptual organization and the representation of natural form. In: Readings in Computer Vision. Elsevier, pp. 680–699.
  39. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03409 .
  40. Science translational medicine 8(337): 337ra64–337ra64.
  41. Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) .
  42. Shepard D (1968) A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. In: Proceedings of the 1968 23rd ACM national conference. pp. 517–524.
  43. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters .
  44. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.02909 .
  45. In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 3875–3881.
  46. Shiu Y and Ahmad S (1989) Calibration of wrist-mounted robotic sensors by solving homogeneous transform equations of the form ax= xb. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 5(1): 16–29.
  47. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 1386–1395.
  48. Solina F and Bajcsy R (1990) Recovery of parametric models from range images: The case for superquadrics with global deformations. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 12(2): 131–147.
  49. Sontag ED (2008) Input to state stability: Basic concepts and results. In: Nonlinear and optimal control theory. Springer, pp. 163–220.
  50. In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 6080–6086.
  51. Sundaresan P, Antonova R and Bohg J (2022) Diffcloud: Real-to-sim from point clouds with differentiable simulation and rendering of deformable objects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.03139 .
  52. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5(2): 2325–2332.
  53. Tang T and Tomizuka M (2018) Track deformable objects from point clouds with structure preserved registration. The International Journal of Robotics Research : 0278364919841431.
  54. Tang T and Tomizuka M (2022) Track deformable objects from point clouds with structure preserved registration. The International Journal of Robotics Research 41(6): 599–614.
  55. In: Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. pp. 205–214.
  56. In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 8274–8281.
  57. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 112: 72–83.
  58. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(2): 5544–5551.
  59. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34: 29088–29100.
  60. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 39(4): 3134–3153.
  61. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 39(1): 417–436.
  62. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 6(3): 5381–5388.
  63. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL and Zhu JZ (2005) The finite element method: its basis and fundamentals. Elsevier.
  64. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 33(4): 1–12.
Citations (2)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.