Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Parent Hamiltonian Reconstruction via Inverse Quantum Annealing

Published 20 Mar 2023 in quant-ph | (2303.11200v3)

Abstract: Finding a local Hamiltonian $\hat{\mathcal{H}}$ having a given many-body wavefunction $|\psi\rangle$ as its ground state, i.e. a parent Hamiltonian, is a challenge of fundamental importance in quantum technologies. Here we introduce a numerical method, inspired by quantum annealing, that efficiently performs this task through an artificial inverse dynamics: a slow deformation of the states $|\psi(\lambda(t))\rangle$, starting from a simple state $|\psi_0\rangle$ with a known $\hat{\mathcal{H}}_0$, generates an adiabatic evolution of the corresponding Hamiltonian. We name this approach inverse quantum annealing. The method, implemented through a projection onto a set of local operators, only requires the knowledge of local expectation values, and, for long annealing times, leads to an approximate parent Hamiltonian whose degree of locality depends on the correlations built up by the states $|\psi(\lambda)\rangle$. We illustrate the method on two paradigmatic models: the Kitaev fermionic chain and a quantum Ising chain in longitudinal and transverse fields.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. J. Preskill, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
  2. A. Seidel, Physical Review B 80, 165131 (2009).
  3. E. Kapit and E. Mueller, Physical Review Letters 105, 215303 (2010).
  4. M. Greiter, D. F. Schroeter, and R. Thomale, Physical Review B 89, 165125 (2014).
  5. X. Turkeshi and M. Dalmonte, SciPost Physics 8, 42 (2020).
  6. E. Chertkov and B. K. Clark, Physical Review X 8, 031029 (2018).
  7. X.-L. Qi and D. Ranard, Quantum 3, 159 (2019).
  8. M. Greiter, V. Schnells, and R. Thomale, Physical Review B 98, 081113(R) (2018).
  9. E. Bairey, I. Arad, and N. H. Lindner, Physical Review Letters 122, 020504 (2019).
  10. D. Rattacaso, G. Passarelli, and P. Lucignano, Quantum 7, 905 (2023).
  11. T. Kadowaki and H. Nishimori, Physical Review E 58, 5355 (1998).
  12. T. Albash and D. A. Lidar, Reviews of Modern Physics 90, 015002 (2018).
  13. A. Y. Kitaev, Physics-Uspekhi 44, 131 (2001).
  14. J. I. Latorre and R. Orús, Physical Review A 69, 062302 (2004).
  15. Y. Zhou, K. Kanoda, and T.-K. Ng, Reviews of Modern Physics 89, 025003 (2017).
  16. N. Linden and W. K. Wootters, Physical Review Letters 89, 277906 (2002).
  17. A. A. Klyachko, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 36, 72 (2006).
  18. N. Linden, S. Popescu, and W. K. Wootters, Physical Review Letters 89, 207901 (2002).
  19. N. Wyderka, F. Huber, and O. Gühne, Physical Review A 96, 010102(R) (2017).
  20. G. B. Mbeng, A. Russomanno, and G. E. Santoro, The quantum ising chain for beginners (2020), arXiv:2009.09208 [quant-ph] .
  21. P. Pfeuty, Annals of Physics 57, 79 (1970).
  22. E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Annals of Physics 16, 407 (1961).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 2 likes about this paper.