SEAM: An Integrated Activation-Coupled Model of Sentence Processing and Eye Movements in Reading
Abstract: Models of eye-movement control during reading, developed largely within psychology, usually focus on visual, attentional, lexical, and motor processes but neglect post-lexical language processing; by contrast, models of sentence comprehension processes, developed largely within psycholinguistics, generally focus only on post-lexical language processes. We present a model that combines these two research threads, by integrating eye-movement control and sentence processing. Developing such an integrated model is extremely challenging and computationally demanding, but such an integration is an important step toward complete mathematical models of natural language comprehension in reading. We combine the SWIFT model of eye-movement control (Seelig et al., 2020, doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2019.102313) with key components of the Lewis and Vasishth sentence processing model (Lewis & Vasishth, 2005, doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_25). This integration becomes possible, for the first time, due in part to recent advances in successful parameter identification in dynamical models, which allows us to investigate profile log-likelihoods for individual model parameters. We present a fully implemented proof-of-concept model demonstrating how such an integrated model can be achieved; our approach includes Bayesian model inference with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling as a key computational tool. The integrated Sentence-Processing and Eye-Movement Activation-Coupled Model (SEAM) can successfully reproduce eye movement patterns that arise due to similarity-based interference in reading. To our knowledge, this is the first-ever integration of a complete process model of eye-movement control with linguistic dependency completion processes in sentence comprehension. In future work, this proof of concept model will need to be evaluated using a comprehensive set of benchmark data.
- “The atomic components of thought” Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998
- John R. Anderson “Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture” In Cognitive Science 29.3, 2005, pp. 313–341 DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_22
- “An Integrated Theory of the Mind” In Psychological Review 111.4, 2004, pp. 1036–1060 DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1036
- John Robert Anderson “Cognitive psychology and its implications” New York: Freeman, 1990
- “An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli” In Vision Research 19.9 Elsevier, 1979, pp. 967–983 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(79)90222-0
- Randall D. Beer “Dynamical approaches to cognitive science” In Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4.3 Elsevier BV, 2000, pp. 91–99 DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01440-0
- “Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the Potsdam Sentence Corpus” In Journal of Eye Movement Research 2.1, 2008, pp. 1–12 DOI: 10.16910/jemr.2.1.1
- Paul-Christian Bürkner “brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan” In Journal of Statistical Software 80.1 Foundation for Open Access Statistic, 2017 DOI: 10.18637/jss.v080.i01
- Paul-Christian Bürkner “Advanced Bayesian Multilevel Modeling with the R Package brms” In The R Journal 10.1 The R Foundation, 2018, pp. 395 DOI: 10.32614/rj-2018-017
- Paul-Christian Bürkner “Bayesian Item Response Modeling in R with brms and Stan” In Journal of Statistical Software 100.5 Foundation for Open Access Statistic, 2021 DOI: 10.18637/jss.v100.i05
- “Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language” In Journal of Statistical Software 76.1 Foundation for Open Access Statistic, 2017 DOI: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01
- “Why reread? Evidence from garden-path and local coherence structures” In Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 70.7 SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England, 2017, pp. 1380–1405
- C. Clifton, A. Staub and K. Rayner “Eye Movements in Reading Words and Sentences” In Eye movements: A window on mind and brain Elsevier, 2007
- L.Z. Daily, M.C. Lovett and L.M. Reder “Modeling individual differences in working memory performance: A source activation account” In Cognitive Science 25.3 Wiley Online Library, 2001, pp. 315–353 DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2503_1
- Jakub Dotlačil “Building an ACT-R reader for eye-tracking corpus data” In Topics in Cognitive Science 10.1 Wiley Online Library, 2018, pp. 144–160 DOI: 10.1111/tops.12315
- Jakub Dotlačil “Parsing as a Cue-Based Retrieval Model” In Cognitive Science 45.8 Wiley Online Library, 2021, pp. e13020 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13020
- Ralf Engbert “Dynamical Models in Neurocognitive Psychology” Springer Nature Publishing, 2021 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-67299-7
- “Readers use Bayesian estimation for eye movement control” In Psychological Science 21.3 Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2010, pp. 366–371 DOI: 10.1177/0956797610362060
- Ralf Engbert, André Longtin and Reinhold Kliegl “A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing” In Vision Research 42.5 Elsevier, 2002, pp. 621–636 DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00301-7
- “SWIFT: A Dynamical Model of Saccade Generation During Reading.” In Psychological Review 112.4 American Psychological Association (APA), 2005, pp. 777–813 DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.112.4.777
- “Data assimilation in dynamical cognitive science” In Trends in Cognitive Sciences 26.2 Elsevier BV, 2022, pp. 99–102 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.11.006
- Felix Engelmann “ACTR-in-R” GitHub repository, 2015 URL: https://github.com/felixengelmann/ACTR-in-R/tree/ee01519
- “A Framework for Modeling the Interaction of Syntactic Processing and Eye Movement Control” In Topics in Cognitive Science 5.3 Wiley, 2013, pp. 452–474 DOI: 10.1111/tops.12026
- Felix Engelmann, Lena A Jäger and Shravan Vasishth “The effect of prominence and cue association on retrieval processes: A computational account” In Cognitive Science 43.12 Wiley Online Library, 2019, pp. Article e12800 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12800
- Felix Engelmann, Lena A. Jäger and Shravan Vasishth “The effect of prominence and cue association in retrieval processes: A computational account” In Cognitive Science 43, 2020, pp. e12800 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12800
- John M Findlay and Robin Walker “A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition” In Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22.4, 1999, pp. 661–674 DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x99002150
- Lyn Frazier “On Comprehending Sentences: Syntactic Parsing Strategies”, 1979
- “Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences” In Cognitive Psychology 14.2 Academic Press, 1982, pp. 178–210 DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1
- Laurence S. Freedman, D. Lowe and P. Macaskill “Stopping Rules for Clinical Trials Incorporating Clinical Opinion” In Biometrics 40.3, 1984, pp. 575–586 DOI: 10.2307/2530902
- C W Gardiner “Handbook of stochastic processes” Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985
- Andrew Gelman, Jessica Hwang and Aki Vehtari “Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models” In Statistics and Computing 24.6 Springer, 2014, pp. 997–1016 DOI: 10.1007/s11222-013-9416-2
- Edward Gibson “Linguistic Complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies” In Cognition 68, 1998, pp. 1–76 DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1
- Edward Gibson “Dependency Locality Theory: A Distance-Based Theory of Linguistic Complexity” In Image, Language, Brain: Papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000
- “Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading.” In Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32.6 American Psychological Association, 2006, pp. 1304–1321 DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1304
- “Surprisal does not explain syntactic disambiguation difficulty: evidence from a large-scale benchmark” PsyArXiv, 2023 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/z38u6
- Albrecht W Inhoff and Ulrich W Weger “Memory for word location during reading: Eye movements to previously read words are spatially selective but not precise” In Memory & Cognition 33.3 Springer, 2005, pp. 447–461
- “Teasing apart retrieval and encoding interference in the processing of anaphors” In Frontiers in Psychology 6 Frontiers Media SA, 2015, pp. 506 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00506
- Lena A. Jäger, Felix Engelmann and Shravan Vasishth “Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension: Literature review and Bayesian meta-analysis” In Journal of Memory and Language 94, 2017, pp. 316–339 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.004
- “Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited: A large-sample study” In Journal of Memory and Language 111, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104063
- Marcel A Just and Patricia A Carpenter “A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension” In Psychological Review 87.4 American Psychological Association, 1980, pp. 329–354 DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329
- “Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading” In European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16.1-2 Taylor & Francis, 2004, pp. 262–284 DOI: 10.1080/09541440340000213
- John Kruschke “Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan” Academic Press, 2014
- Sol Lago, Carlos Acuña Fariña and Enrique Meseguer “The reading signatures of agreement attraction” In Open Mind 5 MIT Press One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA journals-info …, 2021, pp. 132–153 DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00047
- Eric Laloy and Jasper A. Vrugt “High-dimensional posterior exploration of hydrologic models using multiple-try DREAM(ZS)subscriptDREAMZS\mathrm{DREAM}_{\mathrm{(ZS)}}roman_DREAM start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_ZS ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and high-performance computing” In Water Resources Research 48.1, 2012 DOI: 10.1029/2011wr010608
- Yoonhyoung Lee, Hanjung Lee and Peter C Gordon “Linguistic complexity and information structure in Korean: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading” In Cognition 104.3 Elsevier, 2007, pp. 495–534 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.013
- Roger P Levy “Expectation-based syntactic comprehension” In Cognition 106, 2008, pp. 1126–1177 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006
- Daniel Lewandowski, Dorota Kurowicka and Harry Joe “Generating random correlation matrices based on vines and extended onion method” In Journal of Multivariate Analysis 100.9 Elsevier, 2009, pp. 1989–2001 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2009.04.008
- Richard L. Lewis and Shravan Vasishth “An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval” In Cognitive Science 29.3 Wiley, 2005, pp. 375–419 DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_25
- Richard L Lewis, Shravan Vasishth and Julie A Van Dyke “Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension” In Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10.10 Elsevier, 2006, pp. 447–454 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.007
- “A computational investigation of sources of variability in sentence comprehension difficulty in aphasia” In Topics in Cognitive Science 10.1 Wiley Online Library, 2018, pp. 161–174 DOI: 10.1111/tops.12323
- “Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words” In Vision Research 28.10, 1988, pp. 1107–1118 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(88)90137-X
- “Syntactic and semantic interference in sentence comprehension: Support from English and German eye-tracking data” In Glossa Psycholinguistics 2.1, 2023 DOI: 10.5070/G60111266
- Enrique Meseguer, Manuel Carreiras and Charles Clifton “Overt reanalysis strategies and eye movements during the reading of mild garden path sentences” In Memory & Cognition 30.4 Springer, 2002, pp. 551–561
- “Accounting for regressive eye-movements in models of sentence processing: A reappraisal of the Selective Reanalysis hypothesis” In Journal of Memory and Language 59.3 Elsevier, 2008, pp. 266–293 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.002
- “Data assimilation: mathematics for merging models and data” In Snapshots of modern mathematics from Oberwolfach 11, 2018 DOI: 10.14760/SNAP-2018-011-EN
- Bruno Nicenboim, Shravan Vasishth and Frank Rösler “Are words pre-activated probabilistically during sentence comprehension? Evidence from new data and a Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis using publicly available data” In Neuropsychologia 142, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107427
- Bruno Nicenboim, Daniel J. Schad and Shravan Vasishth “Introduction to Bayesian Data Analysis for Cognitive Science” Under contract with Chapman and Hall/CRC Statistics in the Social and Behavioral Sciences Series, 2023 URL: https://vasishth.github.io/bayescogsci/
- “Is reanalysis selective when regressions are consciously controlled?” In Glossa Psycholinguistics 1.1, 2022
- “A Bayesian approach to dynamical modeling of eye-movement control in reading of normal, mirrored, and scrambled texts” In Psychological Review 128.5, 2021, pp. 803–823 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000268
- Keith Rayner “Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research” In Psychological Bulletin 124.3, 1998, pp. 372–422 DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
- “Probabilistic forecasting and Bayesian data assimilation” Cambridge University Press, 2015 DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107706804
- Erik D. Reichle “Computational Models of Reading” Oxford University Press, 2021
- “Toward a model of eye movement control in reading” In Psychological Review 105.1 American Psychological Association, 1998, pp. 125–157 DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125
- Erik D Reichle, Keith Rayner and Alexander Pollatsek “The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models” In Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26.4 Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 445–476 DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X03000104
- Erik D Reichle, Tessa Warren and Kerry McConnell “Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading” In Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16.1 Springer, 2009, pp. 1–21 DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.1
- “Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading” In Cognitive Systems Research 7, 2006, pp. 34–55 DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.006
- “How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing.” In Psychological Review 107.2 American Psychological Association, 2000, pp. 358–367 DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.358
- Dario D Salvucci “An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding” In Cognitive Systems Research 1.4 Elsevier, 2001, pp. 201–220 DOI: 10.1016/S1389-0417(00)00015-2
- Daniel J. Schad, Michael Betancourt and Shravan Vasishth “Toward a principled Bayesian workflow in cognitive science” In Psychological Methods, 2020 DOI: 10.1037/met0000275
- H.E.H. Schilling, K. Rayner and J.I. Chumbley “Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences” In Memory and Cognition 26.6 Psychonomic Society, 1998, pp. 1270–1281 DOI: 10.3758/BF03201199
- Elizabeth R Schotter, Randy Tran and Keith Rayner “Don’t believe what you read (only once) comprehension is supported by regressions during reading” In Psychological Science 25.6 Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2014, pp. 1218–1226
- “Likelihood-based parameter estimation and comparison of dynamical cognitive models.” In Psychological Review 124.4 American Psychological Association, 2017, pp. 505–524 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000068
- “Modeling the effects of perisaccadic attention on gaze statistics during scene viewing” In Communications Biology 3, 2020, pp. Article 727 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-01429-8
- Lisa Schwetlick, Daniel Backhaus and Ralf Engbert “A dynamical scan-path model for task-dependence during scene viewing” In Psychological Review American Psychological Association (APA), 2022 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000379
- “Bayesian parameter estimation for the SWIFT model of eye-movement control during reading” In Journal of Mathematical Psychology 95 Elsevier BV, 2020, pp. 102313 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2019.102313
- “Readers are parallel processors” In Trends in Cognitive Sciences 23.7 Elsevier, 2019, pp. 537–546 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.04.006
- “OB1-Reader: A model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading” In Psychological Review 125.6 American Psychological Association, 2018, pp. 969–984 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000119
- Tanner Sorensen, Sven Hohenstein and Shravan Vasishth “Bayesian linear mixed models using Stan: A tutorial for psychologists, linguists, and cognitive scientists” In Quantitative Methods for Psychology 12.3, 2016, pp. 175–200 DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.12.3.p175
- David J Spiegelhalter, Laurence S. Freedman and Mahesh KB Parmar “Bayesian approaches to randomized trials” In Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 157.3, 1994, pp. 357–416 DOI: 10.2307/2983527
- “Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from self-paced reading” In Memory and Cognition 36.1 Springer, 2008, pp. 201–216 DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.1.201
- Cajo J.F. Braak and J.A. Vrugt “Differential Evolution Markov Chain with snooker updater and fewer chains” In Statistics and Computing 18.4, 2008, pp. 435–446 DOI: 10.1007/s11222-008-9104-9
- Julie A. Van Dyke “Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing.” In Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33.2 American Psychological Association (APA), 2007, pp. 407–430 DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.407
- Nicolaas Godfried Van Kampen “Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry” Elsevier, 1992
- “Sentence comprehension as a cognitive process: A computational approach”, 2022 URL: https://vasishth.github.io/RetrievalModels/
- “Towards a complete model of reading: Simulating lexical decision, word naming, and sentence reading with Über-Reader” In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2020 Cognitive Science Society URL: https://hdl.handle.net/2123/22990
- “What is the scanpath signature of syntactic reanalysis?” In Journal of Memory and Language 65, 2011, pp. 109–127 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.02.004
- “Scanpaths reveal syntactic underspecification and reanalysis strategies” In Language and Cognitive Processes 28.10 Taylor & Francis, 2013, pp. 1545–1578 DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2012.728232
- “Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation by Differential Evolution with Self-Adaptive Randomized Subspace Sampling” In International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation 10.3, 2009 DOI: 10.1515/ijnsns.2009.10.3.273
- Tessa Warren, Sarah J. White and Erik D. Reichle “Investigating the causes of wrap-up effects: Evidence from eye movements and E–Z Reader” In Cognition 111.1 Elsevier BV, 2009, pp. 132–137 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.011
- Ulrich W Weger and Albrecht W Inhoff “Long-range regressions to previously read words are guided by spatial and verbal memory” In Memory & Cognition 35 Springer, 2007, pp. 1293–1306
- “Number feature distortion modulates cue-based retrieval in reading” In Journal of Memory and Language 129, 2023, pp. 104400 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2022.104400
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.