Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Searching the anomalous electromagnetic and weak dipole moments of the top-quark at the Bestest Little Higgs Model

Published 22 Feb 2023 in hep-ph | (2302.11143v2)

Abstract: In this paper, using a Bestest Little Higgs Model (BLHM) approach, we obtain bounds on the top-quark electromagnetic and weak dipole moments. These physical observables are sensitive to quantum corrections induced by virtual particles at the one-loop level. The contributions of the virtual particles are obtained from the vertices of scalar bosons, vector bosons, and heavy quarks: tqiSitq_iS_i, Si=h0,H0,A0,ϕ<sup>0,</sup>η<sup>0,</sup>σ,H<sup>±,</sup>ϕ<sup>±,</sup>η<sup>±S_i=h_0, H_0, A_0, \phi<sup>{0},</sup> \eta<sup>{0},</sup> \sigma, H<sup>{\pm},</sup> \phi<sup>{\pm},</sup> \eta<sup>{\pm}; tqiVitq_iV_i, $V_i= \gamma, Z, W, Z&#39;, W&#39;$; VqiqˉiV q_i\bar q_i, V=γ,ZV=\gamma,Z, qi=b,t,B,T,T5,T6,T<sup>2/3,</sup>T<sup>5/3q_i=b, t, B, T, T_5, T_6, T<sup>{2/3},</sup> T<sup>{5/3}; VW<sup>iΦ<sup>+i</sup></sup> V W<sup>{-}_{i}\Phi<sup>{+}_i</sup></sup> , $W_{i} \equiv W, W&#39;$, Φ<sup>±i=</sup>ϕ<sup>±,</sup>η<sup>±\Phi<sup>{\pm}_{i}=</sup> \phi<sup>{\pm},</sup> \eta<sup>{\pm}; ZZHiZZH_i, Hi=h0,H0H_i=h_0, H_0; $ZZ&#39; H_i$; and $VW&#39;W&#39;$. With these new contributions, we evaluated the electroweak dipole moments at a_t, a<sup>Wt</sup> a<sup>{W}_t</sup> , dt d_t and d<sup>Wt</sup> d<sup>{W}_{t}</sup> of the top-quark in the diagonalization schemes $y_2 &gt; y_3$ and $y_2 &lt; y_3$ to the Yukawa couplings. For the BLHM parameters, we choose the following values of mA0=1000m_{A_0}= 1000 GeV, mη<sup>0=</sup>100m_{\eta<sup>0}=</sup> 100 GeV, f=[1000,3000]f=[1000, 3000] GeV, F=[3000,6000]F=[3000, 6000] GeV and tanβ=3\tan\beta=3, which give the best sensitivity on the electroweak dipole moments of the top-quark in this context: at=1.39×10<sup>4</sup>+i6.55×10<sup>5a_t=1.39 \times 10<sup>{-4}</sup> + i\, 6.55 \times 10<sup>{-5}; a<sup>Wt=6.31</sup>×10<sup>5</sup>i1.39×10<sup>5a<sup>{W}_t=6.31</sup> \times 10<sup>{-5}</sup> - i\, 1.39 \times 10<sup>{-5} for the $y_2 &gt; y_3 $ scenario, while at=2.12×10<sup>4</sup>+i4.49×10<sup>5a_t= 2.12 \times 10<sup>{-4}</sup> + i\, 4.49 \times 10<sup>{-5}; a<sup>Wt=</sup>2.13×10<sup>4</sup>i1.34×10<sup>5a<sup>{W}_t=</sup> 2.13 \times 10<sup>{-4}</sup> - i\, 1.34 \times 10<sup>{-5} for the $y_2 &lt; y_3 $ scenario.

Citations (4)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.