Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On Redshift Evolution & Negative Dark Energy Density in Pantheon+ Supernovae

Published 30 Jan 2023 in astro-ph.CO, gr-qc, hep-ph, and hep-th | (2301.12725v3)

Abstract: Within the Friedmann-Lema^itre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) framework, the Hubble constant H0H_0 is an integration constant. Thus, consistency of the model demands observational constancy of H0H_0. We demonstrate redshift evolution of best fit Λ\LambdaCDM parameters (H0,Ωm)(H_0, \Omega_{m}) in Pantheon+ supernove (SNe). Redshift evolution of best fit cosmological parameters is a prerequisite to finding a statistically significant evolution as well as identifying alternative models that are competitive with Λ\LambdaCDM in a Bayesian model comparison. To assess statistical significance, we employ three different methods: i) Bayesian model comparison, ii) mock simulations and iii) profile distributions. The first shows a marginal preference for the vanilla Λ\LambdaCDM model over an ad hoc model with 3 additional parameters and an unphysical jump in cosmological parameters at z=1z=1. From mock simulations, we estimate the statistical significance of redshift evolution of best fit parameters and negative dark energy density ($\Omega_m &gt; 1$) to be in the 1−2σ1-2 \sigma range, depending on the criteria employed. Importantly, in direct comparison to the same analysis with the earlier Pantheon sample we find that statistical significance of redshift evolution of best fit parameters has increased, as expected for a physical effect. Our profile distribution analysis demonstrates a shift in (H0,Ωm)(H_0, \Omega_m) in excess of 95%95\% confidence level for SNe with redshifts $z &gt; 1$ and also shows that a degeneracy in MCMC posteriors is not equivalent to a curve of constant χ<sup>2\chi<sup>2. Our findings can be interpreted as a statistical fluctuation or unexplored systematics in Pantheon+ or Λ\LambdaCDM model breakdown. The first two possibilities are disfavoured by similar trends in independent probes.

Citations (14)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 2 likes about this paper.