Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Quantum chip design optimization and automation in superconducting coupler architecture

Published 28 Dec 2022 in quant-ph | (2212.13751v2)

Abstract: Superconducting coupler architecture demonstrates great potential for scalable and high-performance quantum processors, yet how to design efficiently and automatically 'Qubit-Coupler-Qubit (QCQ)' of high performance from the layout perspective remains obscure. In this work, this issue is studied for the first time resulting in three key findings. Firstly, we acquire the crucial zero-coupling condition that is only dependent on the geometric design of the layout. Secondly, the upper bound of the qubit-qubit effective coupling is found as $0.0822~ \omega_l/\beta_s2$ which surprisingly depends only on the artificially pre-decided quantities $\omega_l, \beta_s$ instead of specific layouts. Thirdly, we propose an optimal layout design procedure to reach the very upper bound, leading to efficient and high-performance layout design. The effectiveness of the procedure has been demonstrated scrupulously using electromagnetic simulation experiments. As a stirring application, we report a state-of-the-art 3202 um long-range and scalable QCQ layout that is especially crucial to quantum error correction. Our work provides practical guides to optimize the performance of the existing coupler architecture, find out novel layouts, and further advance the progress of quantum chip design automation.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. Shor P 1994 Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science pp 124–134
  2. Clarke J and Wilhelm F K 2008 Nature 453 1031–1042
  3. You J Q and Nori F 2005 Physics Today 58 42–47
  4. You J Q and Nori F 2011 Nature 474 589–597
  5. Oliver W D and Welander P B 2013 MRS Bulletin 38 816–825
  6. devoret M H and Martinis J M 2004 Quantum Information Processing 3 163–203
  7. Schoelkopf R J and Girvin S M 2008 Nature 451 664–669
  8. Gambetta J M, Chow J M and Steffen M 2017 npj Quantum Information 3 2–7
  9. Wendin G 2017 Reports on Progress in Physics 80 106001
  10. Arute F et al. 2019 Nature 574 505–510
  11. Wu Y et al. 2021 Physical Review Letters 127 180501
  12. Zhu Q et al. 2022 Science Bulletin 67 240–245
  13. Ashhab S, de Groot P C and Nori F 2012 Physical Review A 85 052327
  14. Marxer F et al. 2023 PRX Quantum 4(1) 010314
  15. Zhang P et al. 2022 Nature Physics 1–6
  16. Xu Y et al. 2020 Physical Review Letters 125 240503
  17. Li X et al. 2020 Physical Review Applied 14 024070
  18. Sung Y et al. 2021 Physical Review X 11 021058
  19. Stehlik J et al. 2021 Physical Review Letters 127 080505
  20. Tinkham M 2004 Introduction to superconductivity (Courier Corporation)
  21. Dubyna D and Kuo W 2020 Quantum Science and Technology 5 035002
  22. Heinsoo J et al. 2018 Physical Review Applied 10 034040
  23. Sete E A, Martinis J M and Korotkov A N 2015 Physical Review A 92 012325
  24. Wilen C D et al. 2021 Nature 594 369–373
  25. Google Quantum AI 2023 Nature 614 676–681
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.