Inspection of the detection cross section dependence of the Gallium Anomaly
Abstract: We discuss in detail the dependence of the Gallium Anomaly on the detection cross section. We provide updated values of the size of the Gallium Anomaly and find that its significance is larger than about $5\sigma$ for all the detection cross section models. We discuss the dependence of the Gallium Anomaly on the assumed value of the half life of ${}{71}\text{Ge}$, which determines the cross sections of the transitions from the ground state of ${}{71}\text{Ga}$ to the ground state of ${}{71}\text{Ge}$. We show that a value of the ${}{71}\text{Ge}$ half life which is larger than the standard one can reduce or even solve the Gallium Anomaly. Considering the short-baseline neutrino oscillation interpretation of the Gallium Anomaly, we show that a value of the ${}{71}\text{Ge}$ half life which is larger than the standard one can reduce the tension with the results of other experiments. Since the standard value of the ${}{71}\text{Ge}$ half life was measured in 1985, we advocate the importance of new measurements with modern technique and apparatus for a better assessment of the Gallium Anomaly.
- J. N. Abdurashitov et al. (SAGE), Phys. Rev. C73, 045805 (2006), nucl-ex/0512041 .
- M. Laveder, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 168, 344 (2007).
- C. Giunti and M. Laveder, Mod. Phys. Lett. A22, 2499 (2007), hep-ph/0610352 .
- P. Anselmann et al. (GALLEX), Phys. Lett. B342, 440 (1995).
- W. Hampel et al. (GALLEX), Phys. Lett. B420, 114 (1998).
- J. N. Abdurashitov et al. (SAGE), Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4708 (1996).
- J. N. Abdurashitov et al. (SAGE), Phys. Rev. C59, 2246 (1999), hep-ph/9803418 .
- J. N. Abdurashitov et al. (SAGE), Phys. Rev. C80, 015807 (2009), arXiv:0901.2200 [nucl-ex] .
- J. N. Bahcall, Phys. Rev. C56, 3391 (1997), hep-ph/9710491 .
- C. Giunti and T. Lasserre, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 163 (2019), arXiv:1901.08330 [hep-ph] .
- B. Dasgupta and J. Kopp, Phys.Rept. 928, 63 (2021), arXiv:2106.05913 [hep-ph] .
- V. Barinov et al. (BEST), Phys.Rev.Lett. 128, 232501 (2022a), arXiv:2109.11482 [nucl-ex] .
- V. Barinov et al. (BEST), Phys.Rev.C 105, 065502 (2022b), arXiv:2201.07364 [nucl-ex] .
- R. L. Workman (Particle Data Group), PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022).
- A. P. Serebrov et al., Phys. Rev. D 104, 032003 (2021), arXiv:2005.05301 [hep-ex] .
- V. Barinov and D. Gorbunov, Phys. Rev. D 105, L051703 (2022), arXiv:2109.14654 [hep-ph] .
- M. V. Danilov and N. A. Skrobova, JETP Lett. 112, 452 (2020).
- W. C. Haxton, Phys. Lett. B431, 110 (1998), nucl-th/9804011 .
- D. Frekers et al., Phys. Rev. C91, 034608 (2015).
- S. V. Semenov, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 83, 1549 (2020).
- D. Krofcheck et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1051 (1985).
- D. Krofcheck,  (1987), phD Thesis, Ohio State University.
- J. N. Bahcall, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 881 (1978).
- M. Alanssari et al., Int. J. Mass Spectrometry 406, 1 (2016).
- G. Rudstam,  (1956), PhD Thesis, University of Uppsala.
- W. Hampel and L. Remsberg, Phys. Rev. C31, 666 (1985).
- G. D’Agostini, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A346, 306 (1994).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.