Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Where Am I Now? Dynamically Finding Optimal Sensor States to Minimize Localization Uncertainty for a Perception-Denied Rover

Published 30 Nov 2022 in cs.RO and cs.AI | (2211.16721v2)

Abstract: We present DyFOS, an active perception method that dynamically finds optimal states to minimize localization uncertainty while avoiding obstacles and occlusions. We consider the scenario where a perception-denied rover relies on position and uncertainty measurements from a viewer robot to localize itself along an obstacle-filled path. The position uncertainty from the viewer's sensor is a function of the states of the sensor itself, the rover, and the surrounding environment. To find an optimal sensor state that minimizes the rover's localization uncertainty, DyFOS uses a localization uncertainty prediction pipeline in an optimization search. Given numerous samples of the states mentioned above, the pipeline predicts the rover's localization uncertainty with the help of a trained, complex state-dependent sensor measurement model (a probabilistic neural network). Our pipeline also predicts occlusion and obstacle collision to remove undesirable viewer states and reduce unnecessary computations. We evaluate the proposed method numerically and in simulation. Our results show that DyFOS is faster than brute force yet performs on par. DyFOS also yielded lower localization uncertainties than faster random and heuristic-based searches.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. The Impact of Adverse Weather Conditions on Autonomous Vehicles: How Rain, Snow, Fog, and Hail Affect the Performance of a Self-Driving Car. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 14(2):103–111, 2019.
  2. An Overview of Autonomous Vehicles Sensors and Their Vulnerability to Weather Conditions. Sensors, 21(16), 2021.
  3. Weather Influence and Classification with Automotive Lidar Sensors. In 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pages 1527–1534, 2019.
  4. RADIATE: A Radar Dataset for Automotive Perception in Bad Weather. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 1–7, 2021.
  5. Performance Test of Autonomous Vehicle Lidar Sensors Under Different Weather Conditions. Transportation Research Record, 2674:319 – 329, 2020.
  6. Troi Williams and Yu Sun. Learning State-Dependent, Sensor Measurement Models for Localization. In 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 3090–3097, 2019.
  7. Troi Williams and Yu Sun. Learning State-Dependent Sensor Measurement Models with Limited Sensor Measurements. In 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 86–93, 2021.
  8. Using infrared sensors for distance measurement in mobile robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 40(4):255–266, 2002.
  9. Tree Search Techniques for Adversarial Target Tracking With Distance-Dependent Measurement Noise. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 30(2):712–727, 2022.
  10. TDOA-Based Source Localization With Distance-Dependent Noises. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(1):468–480, 2015.
  11. PAMPC: Perception-Aware Model Predictive Control for Quadrotors. In 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 1–8, 2018.
  12. Revisiting Active Perception. Autonomous Robots, 42(2):177–196, 2018.
  13. Yiannis Aloimonos. Active Perception. Psychology Press, 2013.
  14. R. Bajcsy. Active Perception. Proceedings of the IEEE, 76(8):966–1005, 1988.
  15. Multi-Modal Active Perception for Information Gathering in Science Missions. Auton. Robots, 43(7):1827–1853, oct 2019.
  16. Active Perception for Foreground Segmentation: An RGB-D Data-Based Background Modeling Method. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 16(4):1596–1609, 2019.
  17. Active Target Localization for Bearing Based Robotic Telemetry. In 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 488–493, 2011.
  18. Active Perception for Autonomous Vehicles. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 1620–1627, 2012.
  19. Active Target Tracking and Cooperative Localization for Teams of Aerial Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 21(5):1694–1707, 2013.
  20. Deep Neural Network-Based Cooperative Visual Tracking Through Multiple Micro Aerial Vehicles. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 3(4):3193–3200, 2018.
  21. Active Perception Based Formation Control for Multiple Aerial Vehicles. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 4(4):4491–4498, 2019.
  22. Markerless Outdoor Human Motion Capture Using Multiple Autonomous Micro Aerial Vehicles. In 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 823–832, 2019.
  23. AirCapRL: Autonomous Aerial Human Motion Capture Using Deep Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 5(4):6678–6685, 2020.
  24. An Active Perception Framework for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Navigation Under Sensor Constraints. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, pages 1–16, 2022.
  25. A Dynamic Weighted Area Assignment Based on a Particle Filter for Active Cooperative Perception. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 5(2):736–743, 2020.
  26. Autonomous UAV Navigation for Active Perception of Targets in Uncertain and Cluttered Environments. In 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pages 1–12, 2020.
  27. Active Mapping and Robot Exploration: A Survey. Sensors, 21(7), 2021.
  28. A Survey on Active Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: State of the Art and New Frontiers. 2022.
  29. Collaborative Multi-Robot Search and Rescue: Planning, Coordination, Perception, and Active Vision. IEEE Access, 8:191617–191643, 2020.
  30. Hierarchical Control of a Team of Quadrotors for Cooperative Active Target Tracking. In 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 5730–5735, 2013.
  31. Yu Sun and Troi Williams. Learning state-dependent sensor measurement models for localization, February 2020. USF Patents.
  32. FIRM: Feedback controller-based information-state roadmap - A framework for motion planning under uncertainty. In 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 4284–4291, 2011.
  33. FIRM: Sampling-based feedback motion-planning under motion uncertainty and imperfect measurements. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 33(2):268–304, 2014.
  34. OctoMap: An Efficient Probabilistic 3D Mapping Framework Based on Octrees. Autonomous Robots, 2013. Software available at https://octomap.github.io.
  35. Differential Evolution–A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces. Journal of global optimization, 11(4):341–359, 1997.
  36. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods, 17:261–272, 2020.
  37. Sean Gillies et al. Shapely: Manipulation and Analysis of Geometric Objects, 2007–.
  38. N. Koenig and A. Howard. Design and use paradigms for gazebo, an open-source multi-robot simulator. In 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566), volume 3, pages 2149–2154 vol.3, 2004.
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.