Bayesian Calibration of the Intelligent Driver Model (2210.03571v2)
Abstract: Accurate calibration of car-following models is essential for understanding human driving behaviors and implementing high-fidelity microscopic simulations. This work proposes a memory-augmented Bayesian calibration technique to capture both uncertainty in the model parameters and the temporally correlated behavior discrepancy between model predictions and observed data. Specifically, we characterize the parameter uncertainty using a hierarchical Bayesian framework and model the temporally correlated errors using Gaussian processes. We apply the Bayesian calibration technique to the intelligent driver model (IDM) and develop a novel stochastic car-following model named memory-augmented IDM (MA-IDM). To evaluate the effectiveness of MA-IDM, we compare the proposed MA-IDM with Bayesian IDM in which errors are assumed to be i.i.d., and our simulation results based on the HighD dataset show that MA-IDM can generate more realistic driving behaviors and provide better uncertainty quantification than Bayesian IDM. By analyzing the lengthscale parameter of the Gaussian process, we also show that taking the driving actions from the past five seconds into account can be helpful in modeling and simulating the human driver's car-following behaviors.
- W. Wang, L. Wang, C. Zhang, C. Liu, L. Sun, et al., “Social interactions for autonomous driving: A review and perspectives,” Foundations and Trends® in Robotics, vol. 10, no. 3-4, pp. 198–376, 2022.
- V. Punzo, Z. Zheng, and M. Montanino, “About calibration of car-following dynamics of automated and human-driven vehicles: Methodology, guidelines and codes,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 128, p. 103165, 2021.
- S. Hoogendoorn and R. Hoogendoorn, “Calibration of microscopic traffic-flow models using multiple data sources,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 368, no. 1928, pp. 4497–4517, 2010.
- M. Rahman, M. Chowdhury, T. Khan, and P. Bhavsar, “Improving the efficacy of car-following models with a new stochastic parameter estimation and calibration method,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 2687–2699, 2015.
- F. Abodo, A. Berthaume, S. Zitzow-Childs, and L. Bobadilla, “Strengthening the case for a bayesian approach to car-following model calibration and validation using probabilistic programming,” in 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC). IEEE, 2019, pp. 4360–4367.
- J. Morton, T. A. Wheeler, and M. J. Kochenderfer, “Analysis of recurrent neural networks for probabilistic modeling of driver behavior,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1289–1298, 2016.
- X. Wang, R. Jiang, L. Li, Y. Lin, X. Zheng, and F.-Y. Wang, “Capturing car-following behaviors by deep learning,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 910–920, 2017.
- M. Treiber and A. Kesting, “Microscopic calibration and validation of car-following models–a systematic approach,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 80, pp. 922–939, 2013.
- V. Punzo and M. Montanino, “A two-level probabilistic approach for validation of stochastic traffic simulations: impact of drivers’ heterogeneity models,” Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, vol. 121, p. 102843, 2020.
- D. Cochrane and G. H. Orcutt, “Application of least squares regression to relationships containing auto-correlated error terms,” Journal of the American statistical association, vol. 44, no. 245, pp. 32–61, 1949.
- M. Treiber and A. Kesting, “Traffic flow dynamics,” Traffic Flow Dynamics: Data, Models and Simulation, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 983–1000, 2013.
- R. Krajewski, J. Bock, L. Kloeker, and L. Eckstein, “The highd dataset: A drone dataset of naturalistic vehicle trajectories on german highways for validation of highly automated driving systems,” in 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2018, pp. 2118–2125.
- M. C. Kennedy and A. O’Hagan, “Bayesian calibration of computer models,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 425–464, 2001.
- C. Chen, L. Li, J. Hu, and C. Geng, “Calibration of mitsim and idm car-following model based on ngsim trajectory datasets,” in Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety. IEEE, 2010, pp. 48–53.
- Y. He, M. Montanino, K. Mattas, V. Punzo, and B. Ciuffo, “Physics-augmented models to simulate commercial adaptive cruise control (acc) systems,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 139, p. 103692, 2022.
- S.-T. Zheng, M. A. Makridis, A. Kouvelas, R. Jiang, and B. Jia, “A multi-objective calibration framework for capturing the behavioral patterns of autonomously-driven vehicles,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 152, p. 104151, 2023.
- S. P. Hoogendoorn and S. Ossen, “Parameter estimation and analysis of car-following models,” in Transportation and Traffic Theory. Flow, Dynamics and Human Interaction. 16th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic TheoryUniversity of Maryland, College Park, 2005.
- J. Durbin and G. S. Watson, “Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression: I,” Biometrika, vol. 37, no. 3/4, pp. 409–428, 1950.
- C. E. Rasmussen, “Gaussian processes in machine learning,” in Summer school on machine learning. Springer, 2003, pp. 63–71.
- M. Treiber and D. Helbing, “Memory effects in microscopic traffic models and wide scattering in flow-density data,” Physical Review E, vol. 68, no. 4, p. 046119, 2003.
- M. Treiber, A. Hennecke, and D. Helbing, “Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations,” Physical review E, vol. 62, no. 2, p. 1805, 2000.
- M. Treiber, A. Kesting, and D. Helbing, “Delays, inaccuracies and anticipation in microscopic traffic models,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 360, no. 1, pp. 71–88, 2006.
- R. P. Bhattacharyya, R. Senanayake, K. Brown, and M. J. Kochenderfer, “Online parameter estimation for human driver behavior prediction,” in 2020 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE, 2020, pp. 301–306.
- M. Treiber and A. Kesting, “The intelligent driver model with stochasticity-new insights into traffic flow oscillations,” Transportation research procedia, vol. 23, pp. 174–187, 2017.
- A. Gelman, “Multilevel (hierarchical) modeling: what it can and cannot do,” Technometrics, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 432–435, 2006.
- V. Punzo, M. Montanino, and B. Ciuffo, “Do we really need to calibrate all the parameters? variance-based sensitivity analysis to simplify microscopic traffic flow models,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 184–193, 2014.
- D. Lewandowski, D. Kurowicka, and H. Joe, “Generating random correlation matrices based on vines and extended onion method,” Journal of multivariate analysis, vol. 100, no. 9, pp. 1989–2001, 2009.
- J. Salvatier, T. V. Wiecki, and C. Fonnesbeck, “Probabilistic programming in python using pymc3,” PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 2, p. e55, 2016.
- I. Alvarez, J. Niemi, and M. Simpson, “Bayesian inference for a covariance matrix,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.4050, 2014.
- M. Montanino and V. Punzo, “Trajectory data reconstruction and simulation-based validation against macroscopic traffic patterns,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 80, pp. 82–106, 2015.
- V. Punzo, M. T. Borzacchiello, and B. Ciuffo, “On the assessment of vehicle trajectory data accuracy and application to the next generation simulation (ngsim) program data,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1243–1262, 2011.
- C. Zhang, J. Zhu, W. Wang, and J. Xi, “Spatiotemporal learning of multivehicle interaction patterns in lane-change scenarios,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2021.
- C. Zhang, R. Chen, J. Zhu, W. Wang, C. Liu, and L. Sun, “Interactive car-following: Matters but not always,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.16127, 2023.
- L. Liu, L. Zhu, and D. Yang, “Modeling and simulation of the car-truck heterogeneous traffic flow based on a nonlinear car-following model,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 273, pp. 706–717, 2016.
- M. D. Hoffman, A. Gelman, et al., “The no-u-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in hamiltonian monte carlo.” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1593–1623, 2014.
- D. Foreman-Mackey, “corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in python,” The Journal of Open Source Software, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 24, jun 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00024
- A. Kesting and M. Treiber, “Calibrating car-following models by using trajectory data: Methodological study,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2088, no. 1, pp. 148–156, 2008.
- Y. Wang, M. L. Delle Monache, and D. B. Work, “Identifiability of car-following dynamics,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 430, p. 133090, 2022.
- J. Kim and H. S. Mahmassani, “Correlated parameters in driving behavior models: Car-following example and implications for traffic microsimulation,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2249, no. 1, pp. 62–77, 2011.
- A. Doucet, “A note on efficient conditional simulation of gaussian distributions,” Departments of Computer Science and Statistics, University of British Columbia, vol. 1020, 2010.
- B. Ciuffo, V. Punzo, and V. Torrieri, “Comparison of simulation-based and model-based calibrations of traffic-flow microsimulation models,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2088, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 2008.
- J. E. Matheson and R. L. Winkler, “Scoring rules for continuous probability distributions,” Management science, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1087–1096, 1976.
- M. Treiber and A. Kesting, “An open-source microscopic traffic simulator,” IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 6–13, 2010.
- Y. Sugiyama, M. Fukui, M. Kikuchi, K. Hasebe, A. Nakayama, K. Nishinari, S.-i. Tadaki, and S. Yukawa, “Traffic jams without bottlenecks—experimental evidence for the physical mechanism of the formation of a jam,” New journal of physics, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 033001, 2008.
- Z. Cheng, X. Wang, X. Chen, M. Trepanier, and L. Sun, “Bayesian calibration of traffic flow fundamental diagrams using gaussian processes,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.02799, 2022.
- Y. Zhang, X. Chen, J. Wang, Z. Zheng, and K. Wu, “A generative car-following model conditioned on driving styles,” Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, vol. 145, p. 103926, 2022.
- W. Wang, J. Xi, and D. Zhao, “Learning and inferring a driver’s braking action in car-following scenarios,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 3887–3899, 2018.
- M. A. Makridis, A. Anesiadou, K. Mattas, G. Fontaras, and B. Ciuffo, “Characterising driver heterogeneity within stochastic traffic simulation,” Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–19, 2022.
- B. Ciuffo, M. Makridis, T. Toledo, and G. Fontaras, “Capability of current car-following models to reproduce vehicle free-flow acceleration dynamics,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 3594–3603, 2018.
Sponsor
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.