Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Strong tree properties, Kurepa trees, and guessing models

Published 5 Sep 2022 in math.LO | (2209.01925v2)

Abstract: We investigate the generalized tree properties and guessing model properties introduced by Wei\ss\ and Viale, as well as natural weakenings thereof, studying the relationships among these properties and between these properties and other prominent combinatorial principles. We introduce a weakening of Viale and Wei\ss's Guessing Model Property, which we call the Almost Guessing Property, and prove that it provides an alternate formulation of the slender tree property in the same way that the Guessing Model Property provides and alternate formulation of the ineffable slender tree property. We show that instances of the Almost Guessing Property have sufficient strength to imply, for example, failures of square or the nonexistence of weak Kurepa trees. We show that these instances of the Almsot Guessing Property hold in the Mitchell model starting from a strongly compact cardinal and prove a number of other consistency results showing that certain implications between the principles under consideration are in general not reversible. In the process, we provide a new answer to a question of Viale by constructing a model in which, for all regular θ≥ω2\theta \geq \omega_2, there are stationarily many ω2\omega_2-guessing models M∈Pω2H(θ)M \in \mathscr{P}_{\omega_2} H(\theta) that are not ω1\omega_1-guessing models.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. Uri Abraham. Aronszajn trees on ℵ2subscriptℵ2\aleph_{2}roman_ℵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and ℵ3subscriptℵ3\aleph_{3}roman_ℵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, 24(3):213–230, 1983.
  2. Indestructible guessing models and the continuum. Fund. Math., 239(3):221–258, 2017.
  3. James Cummings. Aronszajn and Kurepa trees. Arch. Math. Logic, 57(1-2):83–90, 2018.
  4. The eightfold way. J. Symb. Log., 83(1):349–371, 2018.
  5. Keith J. Devlin. ℵ1subscriptℵ1\aleph_{1}roman_ℵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-trees. Ann. Math. Logic, 13(3):267–330, 1978.
  6. Laura Fontanella. Strong tree properties for two successive cardinals. Arch. Math. Logic, 51(5-6):601–620, 2012.
  7. Fragments of strong compactness, families of partitions and ideal extensions. Fund. Math., 234(2):171–190, 2016.
  8. The super tree property at the successor of a singular. Israel J. Math., 236(1):473–500, 2020.
  9. Joel David Hamkins. Extensions with the approximation and cover properties have no new large cardinals. Fund. Math., 180(3):257–277, 2003.
  10. Small embedding characterizations for large cardinals. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, 170(2):251–271, 2019.
  11. The tree property and the continuum function below ℵωsubscriptℵ𝜔\aleph_{\omega}roman_ℵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 64(1-2):89–102, 2018.
  12. Thomas Jech. Some combinatorial problems concerning uncountable cardinals. Ann. Math. Logic, 5:165–198, 1972/73.
  13. Thomas Jech. Set theory. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003. The third millennium edition, revised and expanded.
  14. Stacking mice. J. Symbolic Logic, 74(1):315–335, 2009.
  15. John Krueger. Guessing models imply the singular cardinal hypothesis. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 147(12):5427–5434, 2019.
  16. Djuro Kurepa. Ensembles ordonnés et ramifiés de points. Math. Balkanica, 7:201–204, 1977.
  17. Chris Lambie-Hanson. Squares and covering matrices. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, 165(2):673–694, 2014.
  18. Chris Lambie-Hanson. Squares and narrow systems. J. Symb. Log., 82(3):834–859, 2017.
  19. Squares, ascent paths, and chain conditions. J. Symb. Log., 83(4):1512–1538, 2018.
  20. Strong tree properties and cardinal arithmetic. 2022. In preparation.
  21. Philipp Lücke. Ascending paths and forcings that specialize higher Aronszajn trees. Fund. Math., 239(1):51–84, 2017.
  22. Menachem Magidor. Combinatorial characterization of supercompact cardinals. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 42:279–285, 1974.
  23. Telis K. Menas. On strong compactness and supercompactness. Ann. Math. Logic, 7:327–359, 1974/75.
  24. William J. Mitchell. On the Hamkins approximation property. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, 144(1-3):126–129, 2006.
  25. Stevo B. Todorčević. Some consequences of MA+¬⁢wKHMAwKH{\rm MA}+\neg{\rm wKH}roman_MA + ¬ roman_wKH. Topology Appl., 12(2):187–202, 1981.
  26. Matteo Viale. Guessing models and generalized Laver diamond. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, 163(11):1660–1678, 2012.
  27. On the consistency strength of the proper forcing axiom. Adv. Math., 228(5):2672–2687, 2011.
  28. Christoph Weiß. The combinatorial essence of supercompactness. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, 163(11):1710–1717, 2012.
Citations (4)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.