Quantitative results of the Romanov type representation functions
Abstract: For $\alpha >0$, let $$\mathscr{A}={ a_1<a_2<a_3<\cdots\}$$ and $$\mathscr{L}=\{ \ell_1, \ell_2, \ell_3,\cdots\} \quad \text{(not~necessarily~different)}$$ be two sequences of positive integers with $\mathscr{A}(m)>(\log m)\alpha $ for infinitely many positive integers $m$ and $\ell_m<0.9\log\log m$ for sufficiently integers $m$. Suppose further that $(\ell_i,a_i)=1$ for all $i$. For any $n$, let $f_{\mathscr{A},\mathscr{L}}(n)$ be the number of the available representations listed below $$\ell_in=p+a_i \quad \left(1\le i\le \mathscr{A}(n)\right),$$ where $p$ is a prime number. It is proved that $$\limsup_{n\to \infty } \frac{f_{\mathscr{A},\mathscr{L}}(n)}{\log\log n}>0,$$ which covers an old result of Erd\H os in 1950 by taking $a_i=2i$ and $\ell_i=1$. One key ingredient in the argument is a technical lemma established here which illustrates how to pick out the admissible parts of an arbitrarily given set of distinct linear functions. The proof then reduces to the verifications of a hypothesis involving well--distributed sets introduced by Maynard, which of course would be the other key ingredient in the argument.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.