Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Projective measurements are sufficient for recycling nonlocality

Published 10 Feb 2022 in quant-ph | (2202.05007v3)

Abstract: Unsharp measurements are widely seen as the key resource for recycling the nonlocality of an entangled state shared between several sequential observers. Contrasting this, we here show that nonlocality can be recycled using only standard projective measurements, without using quantum ancillas. Focusing on the CHSH inequality, we determine the optimal trade-off in the Bell parameters for a maximally entangled two-qubit state in the presence of shared classical randomness. We then find that non-maximally entangled states make possible larger sequential violations, which contrasts the standard CHSH scenario. Furthermore, we show that nonlocality can be recycled even when only using projective measurements and local randomness. We discuss the implications of our results for experimental implementations of sequential nonlocality.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (11)
  1. S. Mal, A. S. Majumdar, and D. Home, Sharing of nonlocality of a single member of an entangled pair of qubits is not possible by more than two unbiased observers on the other wing, Mathematics 4, 10.3390/math4030048 (2016).
  2. A. Tavakoli and A. Cabello, Quantum predictions for an unmeasured system cannot be simulated with a finite-memory classical system, Phys. Rev. A 97, 032131 (2018).
  3. A. Kumari and A. K. Pan, Sharing nonlocality and nontrivial preparation contextuality using the same family of bell expressions, Phys. Rev. A 100, 062130 (2019).
  4. J. Bowles, F. Baccari, and A. Salavrakos, Bounding sets of sequential quantum correlations and device-independent randomness certification, Quantum 4, 344 (2020).
  5. P. J. Brown and R. Colbeck, Arbitrarily many independent observers can share the nonlocality of a single maximally entangled qubit pair, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 090401 (2020).
  6. A. Cabello, Bell nonlocality between sequential pairs of observers (2021), arXiv:2103.11844v1, 2103.11844 .
  7. T. Zhang and S.-M. Fei, Sharing quantum nonlocality and genuine nonlocality with independent observables, Phys. Rev. A 103, 032216 (2021).
  8. K. Mohan, A. Tavakoli, and N. Brunner, Sequential random access codes and self-testing of quantum measurement instruments, New Journal of Physics 21, 083034 (2019).
  9. N. Miklin, J. J. Borkała, and M. Pawłowski, Semi-device-independent self-testing of unsharp measurements, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033014 (2020).
  10. J.-P. Pellonpää, Quantum instruments: I. extreme instruments, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 46, 025302 (2012).
  11. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and M. Horodecki, Violating bell inequality by mixed spin-12 states: necessary and sufficient condition, Physics Letters A 200, 340 (1995).
Citations (30)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.