Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Scheme dependence of two-loop HTLpt-resummed SYM4,4\text{SYM}_{4,4} thermodynamics

Published 10 Jan 2022 in hep-th and hep-ph | (2201.03510v2)

Abstract: The resummed thermodynamics of N=4{\cal N}=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory in four space-time dimensions (SYM4,4\text{SYM}_{4,4}) has been calculated previously to two loop order within hard thermal loop perturbation theory (HTLpt) using the canonical dimensional regularization (DRG) scheme. Herein, we revisit this calculation using the regularization by dimensional reduction (RDR) scheme. Since the RDR scheme manifestly preserves supersymmetry it is the preferred scheme, however, it is important to assess if and by how much the resummed perturbative results depend on the regularization scheme used. Comparing predictions for the scaled entropy obtained using the DRG and RDR schemes we find that for λ6\lambda \lesssim 6 they are numerically very similar. We then compare the results obtained in both schemes with the strict perturbative result, which is accurate up to order λ<sup>2\lambda<sup>2, and a generalized Pad\'{e} approximant constructed from the known large-NcN_c weak- and strong-coupling expansions. Comparing the strict perturbative expansion of the two-loop HTLpt result with the perturbative expansion to order λ<sup>2\lambda<sup>2, we find that both the DRG and RDR HTLpt calculations result in the same scheme-independent predictions for the coefficients at order λ\lambda, λ<sup>3/2\lambda<sup>{3/2}, and λ<sup>2</sup>logλ\lambda<sup>2</sup> \log\lambda, however, at order λ<sup>2\lambda<sup>2 there is a residual regularization scheme dependence.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.