Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Quasiprobability fluctuation theorem behind the spread of quantum information

Published 2 Jan 2022 in quant-ph | (2201.00385v3)

Abstract: Information spreads in time. For example, correlations dissipate when the correlated system locally couples to a third party, such as the environment. This simple but important fact forms the known quantum data-processing inequality. Here we theoretically uncover the quantum fluctuation theorem behind the quantum informational inequality. The fluctuation theorem quantitatively predicts the statistics of the underlying stochastic quantum process. To fully capture the quantum nature, the fluctuation theorem established here is extended to the quasiprobability regime. We also experimentally apply an interference-based method to measure the amplitudes composing the quasiprobability and verify our established fluctuation theorem by the IBM quantum computer.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition (2010).
  2. M. M. Wilde, From Classical to Quantum Shannon Theory, arXiv:1106.1445 [quant-ph] 10.1017/9781316809976.001 (2017), arXiv:1106.1445 [quant-ph] .
  3. G. T. Landi and M. Paternostro, Irreversible entropy production: From classical to quantum, Reviews of Modern Physics 93, 035008 (2021).
  4. B. Schumacher and M. A. Nielsen, Quantum data processing and error correction, Physical Review A 54, 2629 (1996).
  5. C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium Equality for Free Energy Differences, Physical Review Letters 78, 2690 (1997).
  6. G. E. Crooks, Nonequilibrium Measurements of Free Energy Differences for Microscopically Reversible Markovian Systems, Journal of Statistical Physics 90, 1481 (1998).
  7. M. Campisi, P. Hänggi, and P. Talkner, Colloquium: Quantum fluctuation relations: Foundations and applications, Reviews of Modern Physics 83, 771 (2011).
  8. K. Maruyama, F. Nori, and V. Vedral, Colloquium: The physics of Maxwell’s demon and information, Reviews of Modern Physics 81, 1 (2009).
  9. J. S. Bell, On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox, Physics Physique Fizika 1, 195 (1964).
  10. H. Tasaki, Jarzynski relations for quantum systems and some applications, arXiv preprint cond-mat/0009244  (2000), arXiv:cond-mat/0009244 .
  11. J. J. Park, S. W. Kim, and V. Vedral, Fluctuation Theorem for Arbitrary Quantum Bipartite Systems, arXiv:1705.01750 [quant-ph]  (2017), arXiv:1705.01750 [quant-ph] .
  12. J. Åberg, Fully Quantum Fluctuation Theorems, Physical Review X 8, 011019 (2018).
  13. K. Micadei, G. T. Landi, and E. Lutz, Quantum Fluctuation Theorems beyond Two-Point Measurements, Physical Review Letters 124, 090602 (2020).
  14. A. Sone, Y.-X. Liu, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum Jarzynski Equality in Open Quantum Systems from the One-Time Measurement Scheme, Physical Review Letters 125, 060602 (2020).
  15. J. Dressel, Weak values as interference phenomena, Physical Review A 91, 032116 (2015).
  16. H. Kwon and M. S. Kim, Fluctuation Theorems for a Quantum Channel, Physical Review X 9, 031029 (2019).
  17. A. Levy and M. Lostaglio, Quasiprobability Distribution for Heat Fluctuations in the Quantum Regime, PRX Quantum 1, 010309 (2020).
  18. N. Yunger Halpern, Jarzynski-like equality for the out-of-time-ordered correlator, Physical Review A 95, 012120 (2017).
  19. E. H. Lieb and M. B. Ruskai, Proof of the strong subadditivity of quantum-mechanical entropy, Journal of Mathematical Physics 14, 1938 (1973).
  20. O. Fawzi and R. Renner, Quantum Conditional Mutual Information and Approximate Markov Chains, Communications in Mathematical Physics 340, 575 (2015).
  21. S. Watanabe, Symmetry of Physical Laws. Part III. Prediction and Retrodiction, Reviews of Modern Physics 27, 179 (1955).
  22. C. C. Aw, F. Buscemi, and V. Scarani, Fluctuation Theorems with Retrodiction rather than Reverse Processes, AVS Quantum Science 3, 045601 (2021), arXiv:2106.08589 .
  23. F. Buscemi and V. Scarani, Fluctuation theorems from Bayesian retrodiction, Physical Review E 103, 052111 (2021).
  24. C. Jarzynski and D. K. Wójcik, Classical and Quantum Fluctuation Theorems for Heat Exchange, Physical Review Letters 92, 230602 (2004).
  25. J. M. R. Parrondo, J. M. Horowitz, and T. Sagawa, Thermodynamics of information, Nature Physics 11, 131 (2015).
  26. C. Emary, N. Lambert, and F. Nori, Leggett–Garg inequalities, Reports on Progress in Physics 77, 016001 (2013).
  27. N. Yunger Halpern, B. Swingle, and J. Dressel, Quasiprobability behind the out-of-time-ordered correlator, Physical Review A 97, 042105 (2018).
  28. J. Dressel and A. N. Jordan, Significance of the imaginary part of the weak value, Physical Review A 85, 012107 (2012).
  29. Q. Zeng and J. Wang, New fluctuation theorems on Maxwell’s demon, Science Advances 7, eabf1807 (2021).
  30. A. Solfanelli, A. Santini, and M. Campisi, Experimental Verification of Fluctuation Relations with a Quantum Computer, PRX Quantum 2, 030353 (2021).
  31. IBM Quantum, https://quantum-computing.ibm.com/  (2022).
  32. M. B. Pozzobom and J. Maziero, Preparing tunable Bell-diagonal states on a quantum computer, Quantum Information Processing 18, 142 (2019).
  33. N. Merhav and Y. Kafri, Statistical properties of entropy production derived from fluctuation theorems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2010, P12022 (2010).
  34. H. Pashayan, J. J. Wallman, and S. D. Bartlett, Estimating Outcome Probabilities of Quantum Circuits Using Quasiprobabilities, Physical Review Letters 115, 070501 (2015).
  35. D. Maslov, Advantages of using relative-phase Toffoli gates with an application to multiple control Toffoli optimization, Physical Review A 93, 022311 (2016).
Citations (5)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.