Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On product sets of arithmetic progressions

Published 1 Jan 2022 in math.NT and math.CO | (2201.00104v4)

Abstract: We prove that the size of the product set of any finite arithmetic progression $\mathcal{A}\subset \mathbb{Z}$ satisfies [|\mathcal A \cdot \mathcal A| \ge \frac{|\mathcal A|2}{(\log |\mathcal A|){2\theta +o(1)} } ,] where $2\theta=1-(1+\log\log 2)/(\log 2)$ is the constant appearing in the celebrated Erd\H{o}s multiplication table problem. This confirms a conjecture of Elekes and Ruzsa from about two decades ago. If instead $\mathcal{A}$ is relaxed to be a subset of a finite arithmetic progression in integers with positive constant density, we prove that [|\mathcal A \cdot \mathcal A | \ge \frac{|\mathcal A|{2}}{(\log |\mathcal A|){2\log 2- 1 + o(1)}}. ] This solves the typical case of another conjecture of Elekes and Ruzsa on the size of the product set of a set $\mathcal{A}$ whose sumset is of size $O(|\mathcal{A}|)$. Our bounds are sharp up to the $o(1)$ term in the exponents. We further prove asymmetric extensions of the above results.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.