Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 173 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 77 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 187 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 440 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

IRONWAN: Increasing Reliability of Overlapping Networks in LoRaWAN (2111.10115v1)

Published 19 Nov 2021 in cs.NI, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: LoRaWAN deployments follow an ad-hoc deployment model that has organically led to overlapping communication networks, sharing the wireless spectrum, and completely unaware of each other. LoRaWAN uses ALOHA-style communication where it is almost impossible to schedule transmission between networks belonging to different owners properly. The inability to schedule overlapping networks will cause inter-network interference, which will increase node-to-gateway message losses and gateway-to-node acknowledgement failures. This problem is likely to get worse as the number of LoRaWAN networks increase. In response to this problem, we propose IRONWAN, a wireless overlay network that shares communication resources without modifications to underlying protocols. It utilises the broadcast nature of radio communication and enables gateway-to-gateway communication to facilitate the search for failed messages and transmit failed acknowledgements already received and cached in overlapping network's gateways. IRONWAN uses two novel algorithms, a Real-time Message Inter-arrival Predictor, to highlight when a server has not received an expected uplink message. The Interference Predictor ensures that extra gateway-to-gateway communication does not negatively impact communication bandwidth. We evaluate IRONWAN on a 1000-node simulator with up to ten gateways and a 10-node testbed with 2-gateways. Results show that IRONWAN can achieve up to 12\% higher packet delivery ratio (PDR) and total messages received per node while increasing the minimum PDR by up to 28\%. These improvements save up to 50\% node's energy. Finally, we demonstrate that IRONWAN has comparable performance to an optimal solution (wired, centralised) but with 2-32 times lower communication costs. IRONWAN also has up to 14\% better PDR when compared to FLIP, a wired-distributed gateway-to-gateway protocol in certain scenarios.

Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.