Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Pairing-induced motion of source and inert particles driven by surface tension

Published 22 Oct 2021 in cond-mat.soft and nlin.AO | (2110.11753v5)

Abstract: We experimentally and theoretically investigate systems with a pair of source and inert particles that interacts through the concentration field. The experimental system comprises a camphor disk as the source particle and a metal washer as the inert particle. Both are floated on a red aqueous solution at various concentrations, where the glycerol modifies the viscosity of the aqueous phase. The particles form a pair owing to the attractive lateral capillary force. As the camphor disk spreads surface-active molecules at the aqueous surface, the camphor disk and metal washer move together, driven by the surface tension gradient. The washer is situated in the front of the camphor disk, keeping the distance constant during their motion, which we call a pairing-induced motion. The pairing-induced motion exhibited a transition between circular and straight motions as the glycerol concentration in the aqueous phase changed. Numerical calculations using a model that considers forces caused by the surface tension gradient and lateral capillary interaction reproduced the observed transition in the pairing-induced motion. Moreover, this transition agrees with the result of the linear stability analysis on the reduced dynamical system obtained by the expansion with respect to the particle velocity. Our results reveal that the effect of the particle velocity cannot be overlooked to describe the interaction through the concentration field.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. H. Masoud and M. J. Shelley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 128304 (2014).
  2. V. Vandadi, S. J. Kang, and H. Masoud, J. Fluid Mech. 811, 612 (2017).
  3. J. L. Anderson, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21, 61 (1989).
  4. S. Yabunaka, T.Ohta, and N. Yoshinaga, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 074904 (2012).
  5. S. Ramaswamy, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 323 (2010).
  6. S. Michelin, E. Lauga, and D. Bartolo, Phys. Fluids 25, 061701 (2013).
  7. T. Vicsek and A. Zafeiris, Phys. Rep. 517, 71 (2012).
  8. H. Chaté, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 189 (2020).
  9. H. C. Berg, E. coli in Motion (Springer, 2004).
  10. J.  Agudo-Canalejo and R. Golestanian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 018101 (2019).
  11. Y. Hayashima, M. Nagayama, and S. Nakata, J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 5353 (2001).
  12. Y. Koyano, T. Sakurai, and H. Kitahata, Phys. Rev. E 94, 042215 (2016a).
  13. C. Tomlinson, Proc. R. Soc. London 11, 575 (1862).
  14. H. Morohashi, M. Imai, and T. Toyota, Chem. Phys. Lett. 721, 104 (2019).
  15. S. Soh, M. Branicki, and B. A. Grzybowski, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 770 (2011).
  16. S. Soh, K. J. M. Bishop, and B. A. Grzybowski, J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 10848 (2008).
  17. H. Nishimori, N. J. Suematsu, and S. Nakata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86, 101012 (2017).
  18. O. Schulz and M. Markus, J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 8175 (2007).
  19. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/xxx for the videos of the experimental results corresponding to Fig. 2.
  20. H. Kitahata and N. Yoshinaga, J. Chem. Phys. 148, 134906 (2018).
  21. Y. Koyano, T. Sakurai, and H. Kitahata, Phys. Rev. E 94, 042215 (2016).
  22. C. Pozrikidis, J. Fluid Mech. 575, 333 (2007).
  23. M. Tarama and T. Ohta, EPL 114, 30002 (2016).
  24. Y. Koyano, N. J. Suematsu, and H. Kitahata, Phys. Rev. E 99, 022211 (2019).
  25. N. Cira, A. Benusiglio, and M. Prakash, Nature 519, 446 (2015).
Citations (1)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.