Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Fine-Grained Music Plagiarism Detection: Revealing Plagiarists through Bipartite Graph Matching and a Comprehensive Large-Scale Dataset

Published 21 Jul 2021 in cs.SD, cs.MM, and eess.AS | (2107.09889v2)

Abstract: Music plagiarism detection is gaining more and more attention due to the popularity of music production and society's emphasis on intellectual property. We aim to find fine-grained plagiarism in music pairs since conventional methods are coarse-grained and cannot match real-life scenarios. Considering that there is no sizeable dataset designed for the music plagiarism task, we establish a large-scale simulated dataset, named Music Plagiarism Detection Dataset (MPD-Set) under the guidance and expertise of renowned researchers from national-level professional institutions in the field of music. MPD-Set considers diverse music plagiarism cases found in real life from the melodic, rhythmic, and tonal levels respectively. Further, we establish a Real-life Dataset for evaluation, where all plagiarism pairs are real cases. To detect the fine-grained plagiarism pairs effectively, we propose a graph-based method called Bipatite Melody Matching Detector (BMM-Det), which formulates the problem as a max matching problem in the bipartite graph. Experimental results on both the simulated and Real-life Datasets demonstrate that BMM-Det outperforms the existing plagiarism detection methods, and is robust to common plagiarism cases like transpositions, pitch shifts, duration variance, and melody change. Datasets and source code are open-sourced at https://github.com/xuan301/BMMDet_MPDSet.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. Searching digital music libraries. Information processing & management 41, 1 (2005), 41–56.
  2. Pitch contour tracking in music using Harmonic Locked Loops. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2017.7952144
  3. Music Plagiarism Detection using Audio Fingerprinting and Segment Matching. In 2021 Smart Technologies, Communication and Robotics (STCR). IEEE, 1–4.
  4. Content Based Singing Voice Extraction from a Musical Mixture. In ICASSP 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). 781–785. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9053024
  5. C Cronin. 2016. Columbia Law School & UCLA Law Copyright Infringement Project. update (2016).
  6. Music plagiarism at a glance: metrics of similarity and visualizations. In 2017 21st International Conference Information Visualisation (IV). IEEE, 410–415.
  7. Visualization of music plagiarism: Analysis and evaluation. In 2016 20th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV). IEEE, 177–182.
  8. A computational intelligence text-based detection system of music plagiarism. In 2017 4th International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI). IEEE, 519–524.
  9. Fuzzy vectorial-based similarity detection of music plagiarism. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE). IEEE, 1–6.
  10. Audio forensics meets music information retrieval—a toolbox for inspection of music plagiarism. In 2012 Proceedings of the 20th European signal processing conference (EUSIPCO). IEEE, 1249–1253.
  11. Shyamala Doraisamy and Stefan Rüger. 2003. Robust polyphonic music retrieval with n-grams. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 21, 1 (2003), 53–70.
  12. Audio Cover Song Identification: MIREX 2006-2007 Results and Analyses.. In ISMIR. 468–474.
  13. Singing Melody Extraction from Polyphonic Music based on Spectral Correlation Modeling. In ICASSP 2021 - 2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). 241–245. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP39728.2021.9414190
  14. Daniel Jurafsky and James H Martin. [n. d.]. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition.
  15. H. W. Kuhn. 1955. The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 2, 1-2 (1955), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800020109 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/nav.3800020109
  16. C. D. Manning and H Schütze. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing.
  17. Cognitive adequacy in the measurement of melodic similarity: Algorithmic vs. human judgments. Computing in Musicology 13, 2003 (2004), 147–176.
  18. Daniel Müllensiefen and Marc Pendzich. 2009. Court decisions on music plagiarism and the predictive value of similarity algorithms. Musicae Scientiae 13, 1_suppl (2009), 257–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/102986490901300111 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/102986490901300111
  19. The cuidado music browser: an end-to-end electronic music distribution system. Multimedia Tools and Applications 30, 3 (2006), 331–349.
  20. Music Similarity: Improvements of Edit-Based Algorithms by Considering Music Theory (MIR ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1145/1290082.1290103
  21. Adaptation of string matching algorithms for identification of near-duplicate music documents. In Workshop on Plagiarism Analysis, Authorship Identification, and Near-Duplicate Detection (PAN07). 37–43.
  22. DETECTING AND LOCATING PLAGIARISM OF MUSIC MELODIES BY PATH EXPLORATION OVER ABinary MASK. In CS & IT Conference Proceedings, Vol. 7. CS & IT Conference Proceedings.
  23. A. Tversky. 1988. Features of similarity. Readings in Cognitive Science 84, 4 (1988), 290–302.
  24. Deep neural network based instrument extraction from music. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). 2135–2139. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2015.7178348
  25. Alexandra Uitdenbogerd and Justin Zobel. 1999. Melodic matching techniques for large music databases. Proceedings of the ACM International Multimedia Conference & Exhibition, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1145/319463.319470
  26. Symbolic melodic similarity: State of the art and future challenges. Computer Music Journal 40, 2 (2016), 70–83.
  27. Pop909: A pop-song dataset for music arrangement generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.07142 (2020).
  28. Shih-Lun Wu and Yi-Hsuan Yang. 2021. MuseMorphose: Full-Song and Fine-Grained Music Style Transfer with One Transformer VAE. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.04090 (2021).
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.