Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 91 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 58 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 102 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 181 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A full complexity dichotomy for immanant families (2102.04340v1)

Published 8 Feb 2021 in cs.CC and math.RT

Abstract: Given an integer $n\geq 1$ and an irreducible character $\chi_{\lambda}$ of $S_{n}$ for some partition $\lambda$ of $n$, the immanant $\mathrm{imm}{\lambda}:\mathbb{C}{n\times n}\to\mathbb{C}$ maps matrices $A\in\mathbb{C}{n\times n}$ to $\mathrm{imm}{\lambda}(A)=\sum_{\pi\in S_{n}}\chi_{\lambda}(\pi)\prod_{i=1}{n}A_{i,\pi(i)}$. Important special cases include the determinant and permanent, which are the immanants associated with the sign and trivial character, respectively. It is known that immanants can be evaluated in polynomial time for characters that are close to the sign character: Given a partition $\lambda$ of $n$ with $s$ parts, let $b(\lambda):=n-s$ count the boxes to the right of the first column in the Young diagram of $\lambda$. For a family of partitions $\Lambda$, let $b(\Lambda):=\max_{\lambda\in\Lambda}b(\lambda)$ and write Imm$(\Lambda)$ for the problem of evaluating $\mathrm{imm}_{\lambda}(A)$ on input $A$ and $\lambda\in\Lambda$. If $b(\Lambda)<\infty$, then Imm$(\Lambda)$ is known to be polynomial-time computable. This subsumes the case of the determinant. On the other hand, if $b(\Lambda)=\infty$, then previously known hardness results suggest that Imm$(\Lambda)$ cannot be solved in polynomial time. However, these results only address certain restricted classes of families $\Lambda$. In this paper, we show that the parameterized complexity assumption FPT $\neq$ #W[1] rules out polynomial-time algorithms for Imm$(\Lambda)$ for any computationally reasonable family of partitions $\Lambda$ with $b(\Lambda)=\infty$. We give an analogous result in algebraic complexity under the assumption VFPT $\neq$ VW[1]. Furthermore, if $b(\lambda)$ even grows polynomially in $\Lambda$, we show that Imm$(\Lambda)$ is hard for #P and VNP. This concludes a series of partial results on the complexity of immanants obtained over the last 35 years.

Citations (4)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com