Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Lee-Yang zeros and the complexity of the ferromagnetic Ising model on bounded-degree graphs (2006.14828v3)

Published 26 Jun 2020 in cs.CC, cs.DS, and math.CO

Abstract: We study the computational complexity of approximating the partition function of the ferromagnetic Ising model with the external field parameter $\lambda$ on the unit circle in the complex plane. Complex-valued parameters for the Ising model are relevant for quantum circuit computations and phase transitions in statistical physics, but have also been key in the recent deterministic approximation scheme for all $|\lambda|\neq 1$ by Liu, Sinclair, and Srivastava. Here, we focus on the unresolved complexity picture on the unit circle, and on the tantalising question of what happens around $\lambda=1$, where on one hand the classical algorithm of Jerrum and Sinclair gives a randomised approximation scheme on the real axis suggesting tractability, and on the other hand the presence of Lee-Yang zeros alludes to computational hardness. Our main result establishes a sharp computational transition at the point $\lambda=1$, and more generally on the entire unit circle. For an integer $\Delta\geq 3$ and edge interaction parameter $b\in (0,1)$ we show #P-hardness for approximating the partition function on graphs of maximum degree $\Delta$ on the arc of the unit circle where the Lee-Yang zeros are dense. This result contrasts with known approximation algorithms when $|\lambda|\neq 1$ or when $\lambda$ is in the complementary arc around $1$ of the unit circle. Our work thus gives a direct connection between the presence/absence of Lee-Yang zeros and the tractability of efficiently approximating the partition function on bounded-degree graphs.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Pjotr Buys (13 papers)
  2. Andreas Galanis (41 papers)
  3. Viresh Patel (31 papers)
  4. Guus Regts (45 papers)
Citations (10)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.