Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Parallelism versus Latency in Simplified Successive-Cancellation Decoding of Polar Codes

Published 24 Dec 2020 in cs.IT and math.IT | (2012.13378v1)

Abstract: This paper characterizes the latency of the simplified successive-cancellation (SSC) decoding scheme for polar codes under hardware resource constraints. In particular, when the number of processing elements $P$ that can perform SSC decoding operations in parallel is limited, as is the case in practice, the latency of SSC decoding is $O\left(N{1-1/\mu}+\frac{N}{P}\log_2\log_2\frac{N}{P}\right)$, where $N$ is the block length of the code and $\mu$ is the scaling exponent of the channel. Three direct consequences of this bound are presented. First, in a fully-parallel implementation where $P=\frac{N}{2}$, the latency of SSC decoding is $O\left(N{1-1/\mu}\right)$, which is sublinear in the block length. This recovers a result from our earlier work. Second, in a fully-serial implementation where $P=1$, the latency of SSC decoding scales as $O\left(N\log_2\log_2 N\right)$. The multiplicative constant is also calculated: we show that the latency of SSC decoding when $P=1$ is given by $\left(2+o(1)\right) N\log_2\log_2 N$. Third, in a semi-parallel implementation, the smallest $P$ that gives the same latency as that of the fully-parallel implementation is $P=N{1/\mu}$. The tightness of our bound on SSC decoding latency and the applicability of the foregoing results is validated through extensive simulations.

Citations (6)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.