Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Tight Quantum Lower Bound for Approximate Counting with Quantum States

Published 17 Feb 2020 in quant-ph | (2002.06879v2)

Abstract: We prove tight lower bounds for the following variant of the counting problem considered by Aaronson, Kothari, Kretschmer, and Thaler (2020). The task is to distinguish whether an input set x⊆[n]x\subseteq [n] has size either kk or $k&#39;=(1+\varepsilon)k$. We assume the algorithm has access to * the membership oracle, which, for each i∈[n]i\in [n], can answer whether i∈xi\in x, or not; and \item the uniform superposition ∣ψx⟩=∑i∈x∣i⟩/∣x∣|\psi_x\rangle = \sum_{i\in x} |i\rangle/\sqrt{|x|} over the elements of xx. Moreover, we consider three different ways how the algorithm can access this state: - the algorithm can have copies of the state ∣ψx⟩|\psi_x\rangle; - the algorithm can execute the reflecting oracle which reflects about the state ∣ψx⟩|\psi_x\rangle; - the algorithm can execute the state-generating oracle (or its inverse) which performs the transformation ∣0⟩↦∣ψx⟩|0\rangle\mapsto|\psi_x\rangle. Without the second type of resources (the ones related to ∣ψx⟩|\psi_x\rangle), the problem is well-understood. The study of the problem with the second type of resources was recently initiated by Aaronson et al. We completely resolve the problem for all values of 1/k≤ε≤11/k \le \varepsilon\le 1, giving tight trade-offs between all types of resources available to the algorithm. We also demonstrate that our lower bounds are tight. Thus, we close the main open problems from Aaronson et al. The lower bounds are proven using variants of the adversary bound from Belovs (2015) and employing representation theory of the symmetric group applied to the SnS_n-modules C<sup>([n]k)\mathbb{C}<sup>{\binom{[n]}k} and C<sup>([n]k)⊗</sup>C\mathbb{C}<sup>{\binom{[n]}k}\otimes</sup> \mathbb{C}.

Citations (9)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.