Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

An Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo Perspective on the Ground State of the Dense Uniform Electron Gas: An Investigation with Hartree-Fock Trial Wavefunctions

Published 10 May 2019 in physics.chem-ph and cond-mat.str-el | (1905.04361v2)

Abstract: We assess the utility of Hartree-Fock (HF) trial wavefunctions in performing phaseless auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (ph-AFQMC) on the uniform electron gas (UEG) model. The combination of ph-AFQMC with spin-restricted HF (RHF+ph-AFQMC), was found to be highly accurate and efficient for systems containing up to 114 electrons in 2109 orbitals, particularly for rsr_s ≤\le 2.0. Compared to spin-restricted coupled-cluster (RCC) methods, we found that RHF+ph-AFQMC performs better than CC with singles, doubles, and triples (RCCSDT) and similarly to or slightly worse than CC with singles, doubles, triples, and quadruples (RCCSDTQ) for rsr_s ≤\le 3.0 in the 14-electron UEG model. With the 54-electron, we found RHF+ph-AFQMC to be nearly exact for rsr_s ≤\le 2.0 and pointed out potential biases in existing benchmarks. Encouraged by these, we performed RHF+ph-AFQMC on the 114-electron UEG model for rsr_s ≤\le 2.0 and provided new benchmark data for future method development. We found that the UEG models with rsr_s = 5.0 remain to be challenging for RHF+ph-AFQMC. Employing non-orthogonal configuration expansions or unrestricted HF states as trial wavefunctions was also found to be ineffective in the case of the 14-electron UEG model with rsr_s = 5.0. We emphasize the need for a better trial wavefunction for ph-AFQMC in simulating strongly correlated systems. With the 54-electron and 114-electron UEG models, we stress the potential utility of RHF+ph-AFQMC for simulating dense solids.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.