Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On non-feasible edge sets in matching-covered graphs

Published 15 Dec 2018 in math.CO | (1812.06240v1)

Abstract: Let G=(V,E)G=(V,E) be a matching-covered graph and XX be an edge set of GG. XX is said to be feasible if there exist two perfect matchings M1M_1 and M2M_2 in GG such that $|M_1\cap X|\not \equiv|M_2\cap X|\ (\mbox{mod } 2)$. For any V0⊆VV_0\subseteq V, XX is said to be switching-equivalent to X⊕∇G(V0)X\oplus \nabla_G(V_0), where ∇G(V0)\nabla_G(V_0) is the set of edges in GG each of which has exactly one end in V0V_0 and A⊕BA \oplus B is the symmetric difference of two sets AA and BB. Lukot'ka and Rollov\'a showed that when GG is regular and bipartite, XX is non-feasible if and only if XX is switching-equivalent to ∅\emptyset. This article extends Lukot'ka and Rollov\'a's result by showing that this conclusion holds as long as GG is matching-covered and bipartite. This article also studies matching-covered graphs GG whose non-feasible edge sets are switching-equivalent to ∅\emptyset or EE and partially characterizes these matching-covered graphs in terms of their ear decompositions. Another aim of this article is to construct infinite many rr-connected and rr-regular graphs of class 1 containing non-feasible edge sets not switching-equivalent to either ∅\emptyset or EE for an arbitrary integer rr with r≥3r\ge 3, which provides negative answers to problems asked by Lukot'ka and Rollov\'a and He, et al respectively.

Authors (3)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.