Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Entanglement is necessary for emergent classicality in all physical theories

Published 22 May 2017 in quant-ph | (1705.08028v3)

Abstract: One of the most striking features of quantum theory is the existence of entangled states, responsible for Einstein's so called "spooky action at a distance". These states emerge from the mathematical formalism of quantum theory, but to date we do not have a clear idea of the physical principles that give rise to entanglement. Why does nature have entangled states? Would any theory superseding classical theory have entangled states, or is quantum theory special? One important feature of quantum theory is that it has a classical limit, recovering classical theory through the process of decoherence. We show that any theory with a classical limit must contain entangled states, thus establishing entanglement as an inevitable feature of any theory superseding classical theory.

Citations (34)

Summary

  • The paper argues entanglement is required for any physical theory to exhibit a classical limit, suggesting its fundamental role in the transition to classical behavior.
  • Through analysis using Generalized Probabilistic Theories, the authors show that any theory with a non-trivial decoherence process must contain entangled states.
  • This research suggests entanglement is a universal requirement across physical theories for the emergence of classical properties, inviting exploration of other necessary quantum features.

Entanglement as a Necessary Component for Classical Emergence in All Physical Theories

The paper "Entanglement is necessary for emergent classicality in all physical theories" explores an intriguing question at the intersection of quantum mechanics and classical physics. The authors, Richens et al., argue through rigorous theoretical analysis that any physical theory which exhibits a classical limit must inherently possess entangled states. This conclusion offers an explanation for why nature exhibits the peculiar phenomenon of entanglement beyond the peculiarities of quantum mechanics alone, suggesting its fundamental necessity for the transition to classical behavior.

Theoretical Context and Framework

The work operates within the field of Generalized Probabilistic Theories (GPTs), a framework designed to encompass all conceivable theories that adhere to probabilistic outcomes and operational definitions. This framework extends beyond quantum mechanics and classical probability, enabling an exploration of the theories' properties under broad conditions.

A pivotal aspect of the paper is its focus on the concept of decoherence, commonly understood in quantum mechanics as the process by which quantum systems lose their quantum characteristics and behave classically in interaction with their environment. The authors generalize this concept and propose that in any GPT that can reduce to classical mechanics, a decoherence map should exhibit characteristics akin to those observed in quantum decoherence.

Core Findings

A critical finding of the study asserts that the existence of entangled states is not merely an artifact exclusive to quantum mechanics but is a requirement for any theory that aspires to account for a classical limit. The authors develop this thesis through a series of logical and mathematical arguments, drawing particularly on relationships between state spaces, their convex structures, and the operational effects of transformations.

  1. Relationship between Entanglement and the Classical Limit: The paper posits that the classical attributes of any theory, such as determinism and non-contextuality, inherently demand a substrate capable of supporting quantum-like entanglement. Thus, any non-classical theory that allows for a classical reduction inevitably contains entangled states.
  2. Irrefutability of Entanglement-Free Theories: The authors demonstrate that if a theory features a non-trivial decoherence process—that does not simply discard parts of the system—then it must necessarily host entangled states. This makes entanglement a universal feature needed to support classical emergence from non-classical physics.
  3. Framework Restrictions and Implications: By imposing constraints defined by decoherence maps and state space properties—specifically within the GPT framework—the authors conclude that a state space permitting decoherence to classical theory cannot lack entanglement, except in trivial cases where the decoherence reduces to nothingness.

Implications and Future Speculations

The research presented has profound implications, suggesting that the entropic transition from quantum to classical is not accidental but fundamental across theoretical physics. This insight invites further speculation on additional quantum features that could be derivative of classicality requirements and the broader applicability of GPTs.

The paper implicitly encourages future work to explore whether other counter-intuitive features of quantum mechanics, such as non-locality or the violation of classical causality, might also be inevitable byproducts of a theory's capacity for classical reduction. As a theoretical stepping stone, it hints at deriving such non-classical properties from basic postulates about the coexistence of classical and non-classical regimes.

Conclusion

Richens et al.'s paper contributes a significant theoretical insight by embedding entanglement as a core requirement within the broader tapestry of physical laws that subsume both quantum and classical mechanics. By stipulating its necessity for the classical limit, the authors provide a compelling narrative for entanglement's universal primacy within all conceivable physical theories. While the work is deeply theoretical, its implications for understanding the quantum-classical transition and for probing beyond quantum mechanics are profound, suggesting new avenues for theoretical exploration and potential experimental validation.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 2 likes about this paper.